Linking distortion perception and visual saliency in H.264/AVC coded video containing packet loss

In this paper, distortions caused by packet loss during video transmission are evaluated with respect to their perceived annoyance. In this respect, the impact of visual saliency on the level of annoyance is of particular interest, as regions and objects in a video frame are typically not of equal importance to the viewer. For this purpose, gaze patterns from a task free eye tracking experiment were utilised to identify salient regions in a number of videos. Packet loss was then introduced into the bit stream such as that the corresponding distortions appear either in a salient region or in a non-salient region. A subjective experiment was then conducted in which human observers rated the annoyance of the distortions in the videos. The outcomes show a strong tendency that distortions in a salient region are indeed perceived as much more annoying as compared to distortions in the non-salient region. The saliency of the distorted image content was further found to have a larger impact on the perceived annoyance as compared to the distortion duration. The findings of this work are considered to be of great use to improve prediction performance of video quality metrics in the context of transmission errors.

[1]  Ingrid Heynderickx,et al.  Studying the added value of visual attention in objective image quality metrics based on eye movement data , 2009, 2009 16th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[2]  Mark Claypool,et al.  The effects of jitter on the peceptual quality of video , 1999, MULTIMEDIA '99.

[3]  E.C.L. Vu,et al.  Visual Fixation Patterns when Judging Image Quality: Effects of Distortion Type, Amount, and Subject Experience , 2008, 2008 IEEE Southwest Symposium on Image Analysis and Interpretation.

[4]  B. Wandell Foundations of vision , 1995 .

[5]  Patrick Le Callet,et al.  Does where you Gaze on an Image Affect your Perception of Quality? Applying Visual Attention to Image Quality Metric , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[6]  Miska M. Hannuksela,et al.  Perceptual quality assessment based on visual attention analysis , 2009, ACM Multimedia.

[7]  Itu-T and Iso Iec Jtc Advanced video coding for generic audiovisual services , 2010 .

[8]  Sugato Chakravarty,et al.  Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures , 1995 .

[9]  Tao Liu,et al.  A Novel Video Quality Metric for Low Bit-Rate Video Considering Both Coding and Packet-Loss Artifacts , 2009, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[10]  Hocine Cherifi,et al.  Sporadic frame dropping impact on quality perception , 2004, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[11]  Ajay Luthra,et al.  Overview of the H.264/AVC video coding standard , 2003, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[12]  Tao Liu,et al.  Saliency based objective quality assessment of decoded video affected by packet losses , 2008, 2008 15th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[13]  Wei Chen,et al.  A new H.264/AVC error resilience model based on Regions of Interest , 2009, 2009 17th International Packet Video Workshop.

[14]  ITU-T Rec. P.910 (04/2008) Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications , 2009 .

[15]  Hans-Jürgen Zepernick,et al.  Framework for optimal region of interest-based quality assessment in wireless imaging , 2010, J. Electronic Imaging.

[16]  Pamela C. Cosman,et al.  Modeling packet-loss visibility in MPEG-2 video , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[17]  Christof Koch,et al.  A Model of Saliency-Based Visual Attention for Rapid Scene Analysis , 2009 .

[18]  Khaled El-Maleh,et al.  Perceptual Temporal Quality Metric for Compressed Video , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[19]  Patrick Le Callet,et al.  A coherent computational approach to model bottom-up visual attention , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.