Early integration of form and motion in the neural response to biological motion

Although configuration is important for the perception of biological motion, it is not known whether the processing of configuration occurs early or subsequent to local motion processing. Here we report significantly greater adaptation of the N1 event-related potential elicited by a point-light walker (PLW) following an intact PLW relative to a scrambled PLW, static intact PLW, or no adaptation. These results indicate that the N1 to biological motion reflects the activity of a neural population involved in the early integration of form and motion, suggesting that configuration is processed at the same time as, or prior to, local motion.

[1]  R. Blake,et al.  Brain activity evoked by inverted and imagined biological motion , 2001, Vision Research.

[2]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[3]  Pawan Sinha,et al.  Top-down influences on stereoscopic depth-perception , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  John J. Foxe,et al.  The case for feedforward multisensory convergence during early cortical processing , 2005, Neuroreport.

[5]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Dissociable cortical processing of recognizable and non-recognizable biological movement: analysing gamma MEG activity. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  Nikolaus F. Troje,et al.  Structural encoding and recognition of biological motion: evidence from event-related potentials and source analysis , 2005, Behavioural Brain Research.

[7]  D. Perrett,et al.  Integration of form and motion in the anterior superior temporal polysensory area (STPa) of the macaque monkey. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Specific Involvement of Human Parietal Systems and the Amygdala in the Perception of Biological Motion , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  G. Mather,et al.  Low-level visual processing of biological motion , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  N. Troje,et al.  The Inversion Effect in Biological Motion Perception: Evidence for a “Life Detector”? , 2006, Current Biology.

[11]  Kazuo Hiraki,et al.  An event-related potentials study of biological motion perception in humans , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[12]  G. Boynton,et al.  Adaptation: from single cells to BOLD signals , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[13]  Galit Yovel,et al.  The asymmetry of the fusiform face area is a stable individual characteristic that underlies the left-visual-field superiority for faces , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  Georg Deutsch,et al.  Left brain, right brain : perspectives from cognitive neuroscience , 1998 .

[15]  J. Lange,et al.  A Model of Biological Motion Perception from Configural Form Cues , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  J A Beintema,et al.  Perception of biological motion without local image motion , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Maggie Shiffrar,et al.  The perception of biological motion across apertures , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  Aina Puce,et al.  Configural Processing of Biological Motion in Human Superior Temporal Sulcus , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  The human temporal lobe integrates facial form and motion: evidence from fMRI and ERP studies , 2003, NeuroImage.

[20]  Antonino Casile,et al.  Critical features for the recognition of biological motion. , 2005, Journal of vision.