A Strategic Approach to Internationalization: A Traditional versus a “Born-Global” Approach

This article is based on a study of 16 in-depth case histories of New Zealand firms. It uses both the traditional and the “born-global” approaches as a framework to study the internationalization processes of the firms. The authors use the histories to conduct a systematic analysis of the extent to which firms that might be categorized as following a traditional or born-global internationalization path differ in the strategies they have used and in their prior motivations and capabilities. The main findings are that many attributes of the born-global model also characterize firms that began their internationalization along traditional lines but were radically transformed in the process of achieving global reach. This study identifies the consequences of rapid international growth, referred to as “the gusher,” among these firms and the destabilizing effects of the experience as the firm is taken in unexpected directions. The authors conclude that the born-global model has much in common with the internationalization of small entrepreneurial firms and that its most distinctive elements lie in the model's relevance to an increasingly globalized world economy and in the more aggressive learning strategies that are required to follow this path.

[1]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[2]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[3]  O. Andersen.  On the Internationalization Process of Firms: A Critical Analysis , 1993 .

[4]  F. Bradley,et al.  Does the Firm's Technology and Marketing Profile Affect Foreign Market Entry? , 2000 .

[5]  Tony Edwards,et al.  Multinationals, Reverse Diffusion and National Business Systems , 2004 .

[6]  Kent Eriksson,et al.  Experiential Knowledge and Costs in the Internationalization Process , 1997 .

[7]  J. Johanson,et al.  The Internationalization Process of the Firm—A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments , 1977 .

[8]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[9]  G. Knight.  Entrepreneurship and Marketing Strategy: The SME under Globalization , 2000 .

[10]  R. Goodman,et al.  Data Dredging or Legitimate Research Method? Historiography and Its Potential for Management Research , 1988 .

[11]  L. Welch,et al.  Pre-Export Activity: The First step in Internationalization , 1978 .

[12]  P. P. McDougall,et al.  Toward a theory of international new ventures , 1994 .

[13]  A. Rugman,et al.  A Test of Internalization Theory and Internationalization Theory: The Upjohn Company , 1996 .

[14]  Colin Campbell-Hunt,et al.  Explosive International Growth and Problems of Success amongst Small to Medium-Sized Firms , 2003 .

[15]  Andrew Pettigrew,et al.  Longitudinal Field Research on Change , 1995 .

[16]  G. Huber,et al.  Retrospective reports of strategic‐level managers: Guidelines for increasing their accuracy , 1985 .

[17]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[18]  A. Pettigrew.  Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice , 1990 .

[19]  Benjamin M. Oviatt,et al.  Challenges for Internationalization Process Theory: The Case of International New Ventures , 1997 .

[20]  P. P. McDougall,et al.  International Entrepreneurship: The Intersection of Two Research Paths , 2000 .

[21]  E. Autio,et al.  Effects of Age at Entry, Knowledge Intensity, and Imitability on International Growth , 2000 .

[22]  Sylvie Chetty.  Dimensions of internationalisation of manufacturing firms in the apparel industry , 1999 .

[23]  P. P. McDougall,et al.  Toward a Theory of International New ventures , 1994 .

[24]  Joan E. Ricart,et al.  in the Internationalization Process of the Firm , 2004 .

[25]  J. Johanson,et al.  THE INTERNATIONALIZATION OF THE FIRM — FOUR SWEDISH CASES , 1975 .

[26]  H. Håkansson.  International Marketing and Purchasing of Industrial Goods: An Interaction Approach , 1982 .

[27]  J. Jeannet,et al.  Challenging the incumbents: How high technology start‐ups compete globally , 1992 .

[28]  K. Eisenhardt.  Better Stories and Better Constructs: The Case for Rigor and Comparative Logic , 1991 .

[29]  T. Madsen,et al.  The internationalization of Born Globals: An evolutionary process? , 1997 .

[30]  J. Cope,et al.  Learning by doing – An exploration of experience, critical incidents and reflection in entrepreneurial learning , 2000 .

[31]  M. Hitt,et al.  International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. , 2000 .

[32]  Chris Brewster,et al.  Flexible Working in Europe: A Review of the Evidence , 1997 .

[33]  Gordon C. Murray,et al.  The International Market Entry Choices of Start-Up Companies in High-Technology Industries , 2000 .

[34]  Mats Forsgren,et al.  Managing the international multi-centre firm: Case studies from Sweden , 1990 .

[35]  Allen S. Lee.  Case Studies as Natural Experiments , 1989 .

[36]  Margaret A. Peteraf,et al.  Do strategic groups exist? an economic framework for analysis , 1998 .

[37]  S. Shane,et al.  Explaining the Formation of International New Ventures: The Limits of Theories from International Business Research , 1994 .

[38]  H. Thomas,et al.  Strategic Groups: Theory, Research and Taxonomy , 1986 .

[39]  L. Welch,et al.  Internationalization: Evolution of a Concept , 1988 .

[40]  Benjamin M. Oviatt,et al.  Global start-ups: Entrepreneurs on a worldwide stage , 1995 .

[41]  Ø. Moen,et al.  Born Global or Gradual Global? Examining the Export Behavior of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises , 2002 .

[42]  J. Johanson,et al.  EXPERIENTIAL KNOWLEDGE AND COST IN THE INTERNATIONALIZATION PROCESS , 1997 .