The Interplay of Temperament and Regulatory Focus on Consumer Problem‐Solving Modes

Regulatory Focus Theory's two fundamental processing orientations, Prevention Focus and Promotion Focus, have been shown to capture important differences in problem-solving motivation, goal pursuit, and individual-task ‘fit’, although some ambiguity remains regarding the nature of these differences; they have been construed as chronic but have also been related to specific situational factors. Separately, understandings of temperament (hereditable, physiological-based individual differences) have advanced significantly, although efforts to validate measures of temperament have been frustrating. Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory posits two fundamental temperaments, the Behavioral Inhibition System (an avoidance system sensitive to punishments and threats) and the Behavioral Activation System (an appetitive/approach system sensitive to rewards). We relate Regulatory Focus Theory to Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory, initiating the integration of Promotion Focus and Prevention Focus with the extensive extant theory and nomological networks of temperament and highlighting conspicuous empirical divergence between the two systems.

[1]  I. Pavlov,et al.  Conditioned reflexes: An investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex. , 1929, Annals of neurosciences.

[2]  Daniel C. Molden,et al.  Motivations for promotion and prevention , 2008 .

[3]  P. Costa,et al.  The five-factor theory of personality. , 2008 .

[4]  W. Gardner,et al.  Handbook of motivation science , 2008 .

[5]  Martin Reuter,et al.  Molecular genetics support Gray's personality theory: the interaction of COMT and DRD2 polymorphisms predicts the behavioural approach system. , 2007, The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology.

[6]  T. Strauman,et al.  The development of children's ideal and ought self-guides: parenting, temperament, and individual differences in guide strength. , 2006, Journal of personality.

[7]  Rick H Hoyle,et al.  Personality and self-regulation: trait and information-processing perspectives. , 2006, Journal of personality.

[8]  Gerhard Rinkenauer,et al.  Individual differences in approach and avoidance movements: how the avoidance motive influences response force. , 2006, Journal of personality.

[9]  A. Elliot The Hierarchical Model of Approach-Avoidance Motivation , 2006 .

[10]  L. Alloy,et al.  A psychometric evaluation of behavioral inhibition and approach self-report measures , 2006 .

[11]  C. Jackson,et al.  Conceptual distinctions among Carver and White’s (1994) BAS scales: A reward-reactivity versus trait impulsivity perspective , 2006 .

[12]  H. Tennen Distinguished senior psychologist forum. , 2006, Journal of personality.

[13]  C. Halverson,et al.  Temperament Factors as Longitudinal Predictors of Young Adult Personality , 2005 .

[14]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  Temperament and Brain Systems as Predictors of Assertive Communication Traits , 2005 .

[15]  William A. Cunningham,et al.  Neural correlates of evaluation associated with promotion and prevention regulatory focus , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[16]  J. Mayer A tale of two visions: can a new view of personality help integrate psychology? , 2005, The American psychologist.

[17]  M. Zuckerman Psychobiology of Personality: Subject Index , 2005 .

[18]  T. Beauchaine,et al.  A comparison of psychophysiological and self-report measures of BAS and BIS activation. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[19]  P. Corr Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality , 2004, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[20]  Traci Mann,et al.  Dispositional motivations and message framing: a test of the congruency hypothesis in college students. , 2004, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[21]  E. Higgins,et al.  CATEGORIZATION UNDER UNCERTAINTY: RESOLVING VAGUENESS AND AMBIGUITY WITH EAGER VERSUS VIGILANT STRATEGIES , 2004 .

[22]  E. Tory Higgins,et al.  How regulatory fit enhances motivational strength during goal pursuit , 2004 .

[23]  C. Ávila,et al.  The measurement of individual differences in Behavioural Inhibition and Behavioural Activation systems: a comparison of personality scales , 2003 .

[24]  R. Petty,et al.  Self-Guide Framing and Persuasion: Responsibly Increasing Message Processing to Ideal Levels , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[25]  E Tory Higgins,et al.  Moral value transfer from regulatory fit: what feels right is right and what feels wrong is wrong. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  Terri L. Bonebright,et al.  Confirmatory factor analysis of the Behavioral Inhibition and Activation Scales , 2002 .

[27]  Christian H. Jordan,et al.  Motivation by positive or negative role models: regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  A. Elliot,et al.  Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  M. Perugini,et al.  Construct validity and generalizability of the Carver–White behavioural inhibition system/behavioural activation system scales , 2001 .

[30]  Sheri L. Johnson,et al.  Responsiveness to Threat and Incentive in Bipolar Disorder: Relations of the BIS/BAS Scales with Symptoms , 2001, Journal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment.

[31]  P. Corr Testing problems in J.A. Gray's personality theory: A commentary on Matthews and Gilliland (1999) , 2001 .

[32]  N Liberman,et al.  Promotion and prevention focus on alternative hypotheses: implications for attributional functions. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  E. Higgins,et al.  Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride , 2001 .

[34]  E. Higgins Making a good decision: value from fit. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[35]  Charles S. Carver,et al.  Action, Emotion, and Personality: Emerging Conceptual Integration , 2000 .

[36]  M. Rothbart,et al.  Temperament and personality: origins and outcomes. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  R. Larsen,et al.  Clarifying Gray's theory of personality: A response to Pickering, Corr and Gray. , 1999 .

[38]  J. Gray,et al.  Interactions and reinforcement sensitivity theory: A theoretical analysis of Rusting and Larsen (1997) , 1999 .

[39]  O. John,et al.  Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 2nd ed. , 1999 .

[40]  J. Strelau Temperament: A Psychological Perspective , 1998 .

[41]  R. Wilkinson,et al.  A second look at Carver and White's (1994) BIS/BAS scales , 1998 .

[42]  H. Christensen,et al.  Using the BIS/BAS scales to measure behavioural inhibition and behavioural activation: Factor structure, validity and norms in a large community sample , 1998 .

[43]  E. Higgins Promotion and Prevention: Regulatory Focus as A Motivational Principle , 1998 .

[44]  W. Graziano,et al.  Temperament, activity, and expectations for later personality development. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[45]  D. Derryberry,et al.  Reactive and effortful processes in the organization of temperament , 1997, Development and Psychopathology.

[46]  R. Larsen,et al.  Extraversion, neuroticism, and susceptibility to positive and negative affect: A test of two theoretical models , 1997 .

[47]  H. Quay Inhibition and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder , 1997, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[48]  E. Higgins,et al.  Emotional responses to goal attainment: strength of regulatory focus as moderator. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[49]  D. McAdams What Do We Know When We Know a Person , 1995 .

[50]  C. Carver,et al.  Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales , 1994 .

[51]  E. Higgins,et al.  Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance: distinct self-regulatory systems. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[52]  S. Nichols,et al.  Reflectivity and learning from aversive events: toward a psychological mechanism for the syndromes of disinhibition. , 1993, Psychological review.

[53]  S. Guze Psychobiology of Personality , 1992 .

[54]  J. Strelau Renaissance in Research on Temperament Where To , 1991 .

[55]  J. Gray,et al.  Brain systems that mediate both emotion and cognition. , 1990 .

[56]  S. Nichols,et al.  Passive avoidance in psychopaths: The effects of reward. , 1990 .

[57]  W. Iacono,et al.  Neurobehavioral aspects of affective disorders. , 1989, Annual review of psychology.

[58]  J. Gray,et al.  The neuropsychology of emotion and personality. , 1987 .

[59]  E. Azmitia The neuropsychology of anxiety: an enquiry into the functions of the Septo-Hippocampal system, Gray J.A.. Oxford University Press, New York (1981), pp. 523.,£27.50 , 1983 .

[60]  J. Gray,et al.  Précis of The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system , 1982, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[61]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[62]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[63]  J. Hair Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[64]  S. Ochs Integrative Activity of the Brain: An Interdisciplinary Approach , 1968 .

[65]  P. E. Vernon,et al.  The scientific analysis of personality , 1966 .

[66]  Gordon W. Allport,et al.  Pattern and growth in personality , 1961 .

[67]  J. H. Curtis,et al.  Learning Theory and Behavior , 1960 .

[68]  A. T. Mathers,et al.  Conditioned Reflexes. An Investigation of the Physiological Activity of the Cerebral Cortex , 1927 .

[69]  D. Spalding The Principles of Psychology , 1873, Nature.