MA and Togetherness ( Ittaikan ) in the Narratives of Dancers and Spectators: Sharing an Uncertain Space

: The Japanese concept/character MA ( 間 ), commonly translated as “ gap, interval, or the in between, ” partakes in many forms of Japanese arts and daily-life practices. In this article, we report the results of a qualitative research on the meaning or experience of MA and its relation with the feeling of togetherness in the context of contemporary dance improvisation. We interviewed performers and spectators (all professional dancers) while they watched the videotaped and reduced stick- fi gure versions of short dance improvisations created in a laboratory installed with motion-capture sensors. Based on the individual narratives, and inspired by Japanese and occidental aesthetic writings, we elaborate a speci fi c understanding of MA as attending to the event ’ s preacceleration, and how this experience causally relates to the feeling of togetherness ( 一 体 感 , ittaikan ). We propose that MA , understood not extensionally (as an empty space or a silent gap), but intentionally/internally as a certain quality of attention or perceptual mode, is fertile ground for serendipity. MA as an interpersonal ethical construct suggests a transsubjective difference as a foundation for a collective coming together.

[1]  S. Shioiri,et al.  Interpersonal communication on the Japanese concept ``Ma'' , 2020, Acoustical Science and Technology.

[2]  R. Ho Embodiment of Space in Relation to the Self and Others in Psychotherapy , 2019, The Routledge International Handbook of Embodied Perspectives in Psychotherapy.

[3]  Fabian Pels,et al.  Group flow: A scoping review of definitions, theoretical approaches, measures and findings , 2018, PloS one.

[4]  Audrey St. John,et al.  Tensegrity , 2018, Handbook of Geometric Constraint Systems Principles.

[5]  A. Bachrach,et al.  Coordinated Interpersonal Behaviour in Collective Dance Improvisation: The Aesthetics of Kinaesthetic Togetherness , 2018, Behavioral sciences.

[6]  R. West,et al.  Conceptualizing group flow: A framework , 2018 .

[7]  Daniel C. Richardson,et al.  Joint action aesthetics , 2017, PloS one.

[8]  Mitsuru Kodama,et al.  Ma Theory and the Creative Management of Innovation , 2017 .

[9]  M. Morioka HOW TO CREATE MA – THE LIVING PAUSE – IN THE LANDSCAPE OF THE MIND : THE WISDOM OF NOH THEATER , 2016 .

[10]  Lior Noy,et al.  Being in the zone: physiological markers of togetherness in joint improvisation , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[11]  Paul T. Sowden,et al.  Improvisation facilitates divergent thinking and creativity: Realizing a benefit of primary school arts education , 2015 .

[12]  A. Heble,et al.  Taken By Surprise: Improvisation in Dance and Mind , 2014 .

[13]  A. Heble,et al.  The improvisation studies reader : spontaneous acts , 2014 .

[14]  C. Lewis The relationship between improvisation and cognition , 2012 .

[15]  Kay Larson Where the Heart Beats: John Cage, Zen Buddhism, and the Inner Life of Artists , 2012 .

[16]  David Kirsh,et al.  Creative Cognition in Choreography , 2011, ICCC.

[17]  S. Ruddick,et al.  The Politics of Affect , 2010 .

[18]  H. Hermans,et al.  Dialogical Self Theory: List of Illustrations , 2010 .

[19]  H. Clements Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology , 2008 .

[20]  R. Spencer Group Genius: The Creative Power of Collaboration , 2008 .

[21]  M. Morioka VOICES OF THE SELF IN THE THERAPEUTIC CHRONOTOPE: UTUSHI AND MA , 2008 .

[22]  Nakashima Tomoko The Synergy of Positive and Negative Space in Japanese Callgraphy , 2007 .

[23]  Arata Isozaki,et al.  Japan-ness in Architecture , 2006 .

[24]  Ivar Hagendoorn,et al.  Cognitive Dance Improvisation: How Study of the Motor System Can Inspire Dance (and Vice Versa) , 2003, Leonardo.

[25]  H. Hermans,et al.  The Dialogical Self: Toward a Theory of Personal and Cultural Positioning , 2001 .

[26]  H. Nishimura A Culture Theory about “Tachiai” in Professional Japanese Wrestling “Sumo” , 2001 .

[27]  Penny Bernstein,et al.  Creative transformation : the healing power of the arts , 1993 .