Cross-Calibration Between QuikSCAT and Oceansat-2

This paper presents the procedure to perform cross-calibration of radar backscatter between the QuikSCAT and Oceansat-2 ocean wind scatterometers. Both QuikSCAT and Oceansat-2 are Ku-band dual pencil beam, rotating antenna scatterometers with similar design. There has been a joint effort by the Indian Space Research Organization, NASA, KNMI, and NOAA to perform calibration and validation of Oceansat-2 in order to extend the climate data record of ocean surface vector winds obtained by QuikSCAT. This has resulted in significant improvement in the quality of the normalized radar cross section (NRCS) data and the quality of the resultant winds produced using the Oceansat-2 NRCS measurements. An important aspect of this calibration is the reduction of the calibration bias between QuikSCAT and Oceansat-2. The nonspinning QuikSCAT scatterometer was repointed to achieve the same incidence angles for its two HH and VV polarized antenna beams as those utilized by Oceansat-2. The magnitudes of the NRCS (backscatter) measurements of the two scatterometers were then compared for two years in order to determine NRCS bias in decibels as a function of time. Biases for both antenna beams were computed. A wind speed/wind-relative azimuth angle histogram-matched method was applied to ocean data from the two scatterometers to determine the time series of the bias between the two. It has been determined that there was an ~0.5 dB drop in Oceansat-2 radar backscatter on August 20, 2010. As a result, we compute cross-calibration adjustments to apply to Oceansat-2 data before and after this distinct drop in backscatter.

[1]  Bryan W. Stiles,et al.  Trends and Variation in Ku-Band Backscatter of Natural Targets on Land Observed in QuikSCAT Data , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[2]  Dudley B. Chelton,et al.  A satellite-derived climatology of global ocean winds , 2006 .

[3]  Chandra M. Kishtawal,et al.  Prediction of Tropical Cyclogenesis Using Scatterometer Data , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[4]  John S. Kimball,et al.  Evaluation of the SeaWinds scatterometer for regional monitoring of vegetation phenology , 2019 .

[5]  John S. Kimball,et al.  Interannual variability in North American grassland biomass/productivity detected by SeaWinds scatterometer backscatter , 2005 .

[6]  Dudley B. Chelton,et al.  A Global Climatology of Surface Wind and Wind Stress Fields from Eight Years of QuikSCAT Scatterometer Data , 2008 .

[7]  Son V. Nghiem,et al.  The extreme melt across the Greenland ice sheet in 2012 , 2012 .

[8]  D. Karamanis,et al.  Wind energy resources in the Ionian Sea , 2011 .

[9]  Michael H. Freilich,et al.  On the Use of QuikSCAT Scatterometer Measurements of Surface Winds for Marine Weather Prediction , 2006 .

[10]  Michael H. Freilich,et al.  Scatterometer-Based Assessment of 10-m Wind Analyses from the Operational ECMWF and NCEP Numerical Weather Prediction Models , 2005 .

[11]  Axel Andersson,et al.  Comparison of HOAPS, QuikSCAT, and Buoy Wind Speed in the Eastern North Atlantic and the North Sea , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[12]  David G. Long,et al.  High-resolution measurements with a spaceborne pencil-beam scatterometer using combined range/Doppler discrimination techniques , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[13]  H. Hanado,et al.  Diurnal change of Amazon rain forest /spl sigma//sup 0/ observed by Ku-band spaceborne radar , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[14]  Joan M. Von Ahn,et al.  Operational Impact of QuikSCAT Winds at the NOAA Ocean Prediction Center , 2006 .

[15]  S. Keevallik,et al.  Winds in the Gulf of Riga from QuikSCAT and ground-based measurements , 2013 .

[16]  Interannual variability of high-wind occurrence over the North Atlantic , 2011 .

[17]  David G. Long,et al.  An Assessment of QuikSCAT Ku-Band Scatterometer Data for Soil Moisture Sensitivity , 2009, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[18]  Annett Bartsch,et al.  Ten Years of SeaWinds on QuikSCAT for Snow Applications , 2010, Remote. Sens..

[19]  Johnny C. L. Chan,et al.  Size and Strength of Tropical Cyclones as Inferred from QuikSCAT Data , 2012 .

[20]  David A. Clausi,et al.  Fusing AMSR-E and QuikSCAT Imagery for Improved Sea Ice Recognition , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[21]  Luigi Cavaleri,et al.  Eight years of wind measurements from scatterometer for wind resource mapping in the Mediterranean Sea , 2011 .

[22]  Pablo Clemente-Colon,et al.  A systematic comparison of QuikSCAT and SAR ocean surface wind speeds , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[23]  P. K. Pal,et al.  The Impact of Variational Assimilation of SSM/I and QuikSCAT Satellite Observations on the Numerical Simulation of Indian Ocean Tropical Cyclones , 2008 .

[24]  W. Linwood Jones,et al.  Improved Hurricane Ocean Vector Winds Using SeaWinds Active/Passive Retrievals , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[25]  T. Krishnamurti,et al.  Improving Scatterometry Retrievals of Wind in Hurricanes Using Non-Simultaneous Passive Microwave Estimates of Precipitation and a Split-Step Advection/Convection Model , 2012, Pure and Applied Geophysics.

[26]  Michael W. Spencer,et al.  A Methodology for the Design of Spaceborne Pencil-Beam Scatterometer Systems , 2003 .

[27]  Robert E. Fischer,et al.  Standard Deviation of Scatterometer Measurements from Space , 1972 .

[28]  X. Fettweis,et al.  Melting trends over the Greenland ice sheet (1958–2009) from spaceborne microwave data and regional climate models , 2010 .

[29]  Charles S. Zender,et al.  Estimated global ocean wind power potential from QuikSCAT observations, accounting for turbine characteristics and siting , 2010 .

[30]  Michael J. Caruso,et al.  Evaluation of Wind Vectors Observed by QuikSCAT/SeaWinds Using Ocean Buoy Data , 2002 .

[31]  Thomas Linke,et al.  Quikscat backscatter sensitivity to landscape freeze/thaw state over ALECTRA sites in Alaska from 2000 to 2007: Application to SMAP validation planning , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.