Aircraft Conceptual Design Optimization with Uncertain Contributing Analyses

This paper outlines the development of a multi-disciplinary design optimization (MDO) architecture for aircraft conceptual design that includes the assessment of uncertainties introduced by approximate equations or computational methods in the contributing disciplinary analyses. Aircraft conceptual design traditionally harnesses prior knowledge in the form of empirical or statistical equations and low fidelity analysis. This approach is computationally inexpensive and allows for rapid design iterations. However, the use of approximate methods introduces uncertainties that can lead to an optimum conceptual design that, when subjected to more detailed analysis later in the design process, is found to fail one or more of the design goals. This may lead to costly revision. By assessing the uncertainty of the contributing analyses using Reliability Based Design Optimization (RBDO) methods, the probability of failure of a given conceptual design can be estimated and minimized.

[1]  John R. Olds,et al.  Evaluation of Multidisciplinary Optimization Techniques Applied to a Reusable Launch Vehicle , 2006 .

[2]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  Supersonic Business Jet Design Through Bi-Level Integrated System Synthesis , 1999 .

[3]  Kamran Behdinan,et al.  Multidisciplinary Optimization Framework for Control-Configuration Integration in Aircraft Conceptual Design , 2006 .

[4]  Kamran Behdinan,et al.  MULTIDISCIPLINARY DESIGN OPTIMIZATION OF AEROSPACE SYSTEMS , 2011 .

[5]  Natasha Smith,et al.  Probabilistic Methods for Aerospace System Conceptual Design , 2002 .

[6]  Kurt Maute,et al.  Reliability-based design optimization of aeroelastic structures , 2004 .

[7]  Marc A. Stelmack,et al.  Multidisciplinary design optimization of an electric-powered unmanned air vehicle , 1999 .

[8]  John E. Dennis,et al.  Problem Formulation for Multidisciplinary Optimization , 1994, SIAM J. Optim..

[9]  T Haftka Raphael,et al.  Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization: survey of recent developments , 1996 .

[10]  B. Youn,et al.  Enriched Performance Measure Approach for Reliability-Based Design Optimization. , 2005 .

[11]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Reliability-Based Multi-objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms , 2007, EMO.

[12]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  Inverse reliability measures and reliability-based design optimisation , 2006 .

[13]  Joongki Ahn,et al.  An efficient strategy for reliability-based multidisciplinary design optimization using BLISS , 2006 .

[14]  Mathias Wintzer,et al.  Multifidelity design optimization of low-boom supersonic jets , 2008 .

[15]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Aircraft design using collaborative optimization , 1996 .

[16]  P. M. Mujumdar,et al.  Configuration Design of a Generic Air-Breathing Aerospace Vehicle Considering Fidelity Uncertainity , 2004 .

[17]  Zahed Siddique,et al.  A Roadmap for Moderate Fidelity Conceptual Design with Multilevel Analysis and MDO , 2006 .

[18]  Xiaoping Du,et al.  Sequential Optimization and Reliability Assessment Method for Efficient Probabilistic Design , 2004, DAC 2002.

[19]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Framework for Aircraft Conceptual Design and Environmental Performance Studies , 2005 .