Validity of the thermal activation model for spin-transfer torque switching in magnetic tunnel junctionsa)

We have performed spin-transfer torque switching experiments with a large number of trials (up to 107 switching events) on nanoscale MgO magnetic tunnel junctions in order to test the validity and the limits of the thermal activation model for spin-torque-assisted switching. Three different methods derived from the model (“read disturb rate,” “switching voltage versus pulse duration,” and “switching voltage distribution” measurements) are used to determine the thermal stability factor and the intrinsic switching voltage. The results obtained from the first two methods agree well with each other as well as with values obtained from quasistatic measurements, if we use only the data for which the voltage is smaller than approximately 0.8 of the intrinsic switching voltage. This agreement also shows that, in our samples, in the low voltage region, the influence from other factors contributing to the switching (such as current-induced heating and field-like torque) is negligible. The third method (switching vo...

[1]  D. Ralph,et al.  Reduction of the spin-torque critical current by partially canceling the free layer demagnetization field , 2009 .

[2]  William H. Rippard,et al.  Finite-temperature modeling of nanoscale spin-transfer oscillators , 2005 .

[3]  Y. Suzuki,et al.  Inspection of intrinsic critical currents for spin-transfer magnetization switching , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[4]  Ming-Jinn Tsai,et al.  Reduction in critical current density for spin torque transfer switching with composite free layer , 2008 .

[5]  D C Ralph,et al.  Thermally activated magnetic reversal induced by a spin-polarized current. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[6]  Z. Diao,et al.  Spin-transfer switching current distribution and reduction in magnetic tunneling junction-based structures , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[7]  Z. Diao,et al.  Critical current distribution in spin transfer switched magnetic tunneling junctions , 2005, INTERMAG Asia 2005. Digests of the IEEE International Magnetics Conference, 2005..

[8]  Thermal effect and current pulse durations on spin-transfer magnetization switching in MgO-based tunnel junctions , 2007 .

[9]  J. Katine,et al.  Time-resolved reversal of spin-transfer switching in a nanomagnet. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[10]  B. Diény,et al.  Bias-voltage dependence of perpendicular spin-transfer torque in asymmetric MgO-based magnetic tunnel junctions , 2009 .

[11]  H. Ohno,et al.  Current-Induced Magnetization Switching in MgO Barrier Magnetic Tunnel Junctions With CoFeB-Based Synthetic Ferrimagnetic Free Layers , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[12]  Z. Li,et al.  Thermally assisted magnetization reversal in the presence of a spin-transfer torque , 2003 .

[13]  Z Li,et al.  Perpendicular spin torques in magnetic tunnel junctions. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[14]  P. L. Trouilloud,et al.  Magnetoresistance measurement of unpatterned magnetic tunnel junction wafers by current-in-plane tunneling , 2003 .

[15]  Hiroshi Kano,et al.  Thermal activation effect on spin transfer switching in magnetic tunnel junctions , 2005 .

[16]  Dominique Mailly,et al.  Experimental evidence of the Neel-Brown model of magnetization reversal , 1997 .

[17]  Temperature dependence of spin-transfer-induced switching of nanomagnets. , 2004, Physical review letters.