Towards a pedagogy of RHD supervision in the technology disciplines

This document is written to provide • a brief summary of the intended directions of the ALTC project ‘A Pedagogy of Supervision in the Technology disciplines’, and • an overview of existing research outcomes which are likely to be of interest to the technology disciplines, including some cross disciplinary research and some focussed specifically on some part of the technology field.

[1]  L. Ulriksen,et al.  The implied student , 2009 .

[2]  Johanna Hakala,et al.  Socialization of junior researchers in new academic research environments: two case studies from Finland , 2009 .

[3]  Marie Clarke,et al.  Coursework master’s programmes: the student’s experience of research and research supervision , 2009 .

[4]  Margaret Kiley,et al.  Threshold concepts in research education and evidence of threshold crossing , 2009 .

[5]  Rylan Egan,et al.  Relationships between area of academic concentration, supervisory style, student needs and best practices , 2009 .

[6]  Barbara A. Adkins,et al.  PhD pedagogy and the changing knowledge landscapes of universities , 2009 .

[7]  Christine S. Bruce,et al.  Doctoral students’ experience of information technology research , 2009 .

[8]  Mona Chung,et al.  Cultural issues in commencing the supervision of Chinese Research students , 2009 .

[9]  D. Boud,et al.  Changing Practices of Doctoral Education , 2008 .

[10]  Ross Deuchar,et al.  Facilitator, director or critical friend?: contradiction and congruence in doctoral supervision styles , 2008 .

[11]  Anne Lee,et al.  How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision , 2008 .

[12]  B. Kamler.  Rethinking doctoral publication practices: writing from and beyond the thesis , 2008 .

[13]  Gerlese S. Åkerlind.  An academic perspective on research and being a researcher: an integration of the literature , 2008 .

[14]  Angela Brew,et al.  Supervision development and recognition in a reflexive space , 2008 .

[15]  Elaine Martin,et al.  University academics’ experience of research and its relationship to their experience of teaching , 2008 .

[16]  P. Burnard,et al.  The student-supervisor relationship in the phD/Doctoral process. , 2008, British journal of nursing.

[17]  Adrian Ratkic,et al.  Dialogue seminars as a tool in post graduate education , 2008, AI & SOCIETY.

[18]  John Willison,et al.  Commonly known, commonly not known, totally unknown: a framework for students becoming researchers , 2007 .

[19]  Gail Craswell,et al.  Deconstructing the skills training debate in doctoral education , 2007 .

[20]  James Cumming.  Representing the complexity, diversity and particularity of the doctoral enterprise in Australia , 2007 .

[21]  Ruth Neumann,et al.  Policy and practice in doctoral education , 2007 .

[22]  Anne Venables,et al.  Differing Ways that Computing Academics Understand Teaching. , 2007 .

[23]  Catherine Manathunga,et al.  Imagining an interdisciplinary doctoral pedagogy , 2006 .

[24]  Lawrence Wolf,et al.  Doctoral Degrees In Engineering Technology: What Are The Real Issues? , 2006 .

[25]  Keith Wood.  Changing as a person: the experience of learning to research in the social sciences , 2006 .

[26]  M. Hasrati,et al.  Legitimate peripheral participation and supervising Ph.D. students , 2005 .

[27]  L. Persson,et al.  A Dynamic Model for Education of Doctoral Students and Guidance of Supervisors in Research Groups , 2005 .

[28]  Binh Pham,et al.  Constituting information technology research: the experience of IT researchers , 2005 .

[29]  Margaret Kiley,et al.  Supervisors' Conceptions of Research: What are they? , 2005 .

[30]  Jan H. F. Meyer,et al.  Students' Conceptions of Research. I: A qualitative and quantitative analysis , 2005 .

[31]  Janne Malfroy,et al.  Doctoral supervision, workplace research and changing pedagogic practices , 2005 .

[32]  David Johnson,et al.  Assessment Matters: Some Issues Concerning the Supervision and Assessment of Work-Based Doctorates. , 2005 .

[33]  Joanne W. McClure.  Preparing a laboratory-based thesis: Chinese international research students’ experiences of supervision , 2005 .

[34]  M. Pearson.  Changing contexts for research education: implications for supervision development , 2005 .

[35]  S. Booth,et al.  Trusting results - An exploration of physicists' conceptions of their own and others' research , 2005 .

[36]  Pam Green,et al.  Doing developmental phenomenography , 2005 .

[37]  P. Green,et al.  Collaborative knowledge management and the art of coaching: reflections on the diverse roles of the successful supervisor , 2005 .

[38]  Binh Pham,et al.  The collective consciousness of information technology research. Research students' ways of seeing information technology research: its objects and territories , 2005 .

[39]  Dianne P. Bills,et al.  Supervisors' conceptions of research and the implications for supervisor development , 2004 .

[40]  Barbara Kamler,et al.  Driven to abstraction: doctoral supervision and writing pedagogies , 2004 .

[41]  Ian Stoodley,et al.  Constituting the significance and value of research: views from information technology academics and industry professionals , 2004 .

[42]  Noela Murphy,et al.  Orientations to Research Higher Degree Supervision: The Interrelatedness of Beliefs about Supervision, Research, Teaching and Learning , 2004 .

[43]  Shirley Booth,et al.  Expounding on physics: a phenomenographic study of physicists talking of their physics , 2002, physics/0205092.

[44]  Ruth Neumann,et al.  The doctoral education experience: diversity and complexity , 2003 .

[45]  Jill Jameson.  Intuitive expertise in ICT graduate supervision , 2002 .

[46]  Mara Wasburn,et al.  Creating Community: A Pilot Program For Doctoral Students , 2002 .

[47]  C. Bruce,et al.  Constituting collective consciousness: Information literacy in university curricula , 2002 .

[48]  Margaret Zeegers,et al.  'O' for osmosis, 'P' for pedagogy: fixing the postgraduate wheel of fortune , 2002 .

[49]  Christine S. Bruce,et al.  The Collective Consciousness of Information Technology Research: Ways of seeing Information Technology Research: Its Objects and Territories , 2002 .

[50]  A. Brew.  Conceptions of Research: A phenomenographic study , 2001 .

[51]  G. Gurr,et al.  Negotiating the "Rackety Bridge" — a Dynamic Model for Aligning Supervisory Style with Research Student Development , 2001 .

[52]  Angela Brew,et al.  The nature of research : inquiry in academic contexts , 2001 .

[53]  Alison Bartlett,et al.  Postgraduate Research Supervision: Transforming (R)Elations , 2001 .

[54]  Caroline Baillie,et al.  Building knowledge about the interface , 2001 .

[55]  Alison Bartlett,et al.  Reconceptualising Discourses of Power in Postgraduate Pedagogies , 2000 .

[56]  Ekrem Manisali,et al.  Assessing supervision requirements of PhD students: The case of construction management and engineering in the UK , 2000 .

[57]  Esat Alpay,et al.  Postgraduate training in student learning and teaching , 2000 .

[58]  Alison Bartlett,et al.  Cooking Up a Feast: Finding Metaphors for Feminist Postgraduate Supervisions , 1999 .

[59]  Paul C. Burnett,et al.  The supervision of doctoral dissertations using a collaborative cohort model , 1999 .

[60]  Margaret Kiley,et al.  Discipline-related Models for a Structured Program at the Commencement of a PhD , 1999 .

[61]  F. Marton,et al.  The University of Learning. Beyond Quality and Competence in Higher Education. , 2013 .

[62]  I. Tumer,et al.  Benefits Of Team Teaching For Doctoral Students Preparing For Academic Careers , 1998 .

[63]  P. Atkinson,et al.  Creating a Delicate Balance: the doctoral supervisor's dilemmas , 1998 .

[64]  Robert G. Burgess,et al.  Supervision of Doctoral Students in the Natural Sciences: expectations and experiences , 1997 .

[65]  John Hockey,et al.  Motives and Meaning amongst PhD Supervisors in the Social Sciences , 1996 .

[66]  Gilbert Drouin,et al.  Innovative Measures To Improve Performances And Supervision In Post Graduate Studies , 1996 .

[67]  Yoni Ryan,et al.  Quality in Postgraduate Education. , 1996 .

[68]  R. Neumann.  Research and scholarship: Perceptions of senior academic administrators , 1993 .

[69]  Australian association for research in education , 1988 .