An assessment of the energy and water embodied in commercial building construction

Growing global concern regarding the rapid rate at which humans are consuming the earth’s precious natural resources is leading to greater emphasis on more effective means of providing for our current and future needs. Energy and fresh water are the most crucial of these basic human needs. The energy and water required in the operation of buildings is fairly well known. Much less is known about the energy and water embodied in construction materials and products. It has been suggested that embodied energy typically represents 20 times the annual operational energy of current Australian buildings. Studies have suggested that the water embodied in buildings may be just as significant as that of energy. As for embodied energy, these studies have been based on traditional analysis methods, such as process and input-output analysis. These methods have been shown to suffer from errors relating to the availability of data and its reliability. Hybrid methods have been developed in an attempt to provide a more reliable assessment of the embodied energy and water associated with the construction of buildings. This paper evaluates the energy and water resources embodied in a commercial office building using a hybrid analysis method based on input-output data. It was found that the use of this hybrid analysis method increases the reliability and completeness of an embodied energy and water analysis of a typical commercial building by 45% and 64% respectively, over traditional analysis methods. The embodied energy and water associated with building construction is significant and thus represents an area where considerable energy and water savings are possible over the building life-cycle. These findings suggest that current best-practice methods of embodied energy and water analysis are sufficiently accurate for most typical applications, but this is heavily dependent upon data quality and availability.

[1]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  An input–output analysis of Australian water usage , 2001 .

[2]  P.C.F. Bekker,et al.  A life-cycle approach in building , 1982 .

[3]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Errors in Conventional and Input‐Output—based Life—Cycle Inventories , 2000 .

[4]  J. T. Baines,et al.  Energy analysis: a review of theory and applications. Final report , 1986 .

[5]  Dennis Trewin,et al.  Australian national accounts : input-output tables , 1973 .

[6]  G. Treloar,et al.  Life-cycle energy analysis of buildings: a case study , 2000 .

[7]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  GREENHOUSE GAS ANALYSIS OF SOLAR-THERMAL ELECTRICITY GENERATION , 1999 .

[8]  Roger Fay,et al.  Embodied water of construction , 2004 .

[9]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  A Generalized Input-Output Multiplier Calculus for Australia , 2001 .

[10]  G. Treloar Extracting Embodied Energy Paths from Input–Output Tables: Towards an Input–Output-based Hybrid Energy Analysis Method , 1997 .

[11]  Stephen Pullen,et al.  Energy used in the Construction and Operation of Houses , 2000 .

[12]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Differential Convergence of Life‐Cycle Inventories toward Upstream Production Layers , 2002 .

[13]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Using national input/output data for embodied energy analysis of individual residential buildings , 2001 .

[14]  Wassily Leontief Input-Output Economics , 1966 .

[15]  J. Proops,et al.  Input-output analysis and energy intensities: a comparison of some methodologies , 1977 .

[16]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  System Boundary Selection in Life-Cycle Inventories , 2004 .

[17]  Clark W. Bullard,et al.  Net energy analysis : handbook for combining process and input-output analysis , 1976 .

[18]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Endogenising capital: a comparison of two methods , 2004 .

[19]  Bruce Forwood,et al.  AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND ARCHITECTURAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION , 1975 .

[20]  C. Hendrickson,et al.  Using input-output analysis to estimate economy-wide discharges , 1995 .