A multidimensional extension to Hirsch’s h-index

The h-index is becoming a reference tool for career assessment and it is starting to be considered by some agencies and institutions in promotion, allocation, and funding decisions. In areas where h indices tend to be low, individuals with different research accomplishments may end up with the same h. This paper proposes a multidimensional extension of the h index in which the conventional h is only the first component. Additional components of the multidimensional index are obtained by computing the h-index for the subset of papers not considered in the immediately preceding component. Computation of the multidimensional index for 204 faculty members in Departments of Methodology of the Behavioral Sciences in Spain shows that individuals with the same h can indeed be distinguished by their values in the remaining components, and that the strength of the correlation of the second and third components of the multidimensional index with alternative bibliometric indicators is similar to that of the first component (i.e., the original h).

[1]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? , 2005, Scientometrics.

[2]  Quentin L. Burrell,et al.  Hirsch index or Hirsch rate? Some thoughts arising from Liang’s data , 2007, Scientometrics.

[3]  Gad Saad,et al.  Exploring the h-index at the author and journal levels using bibliometric data of productive consumer scholars and business-related journals respectively , 2006, Scientometrics.

[4]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[5]  A. D. Jackson,et al.  Measures for measures , 2006, Nature.

[6]  András Schubert,et al.  Using the h-index for assessing single publications , 2009, Scientometrics.

[7]  J. Hirsch.  Does the h index have predictive power? , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Liming Liang,et al.  h-index sequence and h-index matrix: Constructions and applications , 2006, Scientometrics.

[9]  Mônica G. Campiteli,et al.  Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? , 2006, Scientometrics.

[10]  Michael C. Wendl,et al.  H-index: however ranked, citations need context , 2007, Nature.

[11]  Konstantin V. Krutovsky,et al.  Self-citation can inflate h-index , 2008, Scientometrics.

[12]  R. Rousseau,et al.  Reflections on recent developments of the h-index and h-type indices , 2008 .

[13]  Michael Schreiber,et al.  A case study of the Hirsch index for 26 non‐prominent physicists , 2007, 0708.0120.

[14]  Miguel A García-Pérez,et al.  The Hirsch h Index in a Non-Mainstream Area: Methodology of the Behavioral Sciences in Spain , 2009, The Spanish journal of psychology.

[15]  Michael D. Jennions,et al.  H-index: age and sex make it unreliable , 2007, Nature.

[16]  Rodrigo Costas,et al.  Is g-index better than h-index? An exploratory study at the individual level , 2008, Scientometrics.

[17]  L. Egghe,et al.  Theory and practise of the g-index , 2006, Scientometrics.

[18]  M. Jennions,et al.  The h index and career assessment by numbers. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[19]  Juan Imperial,et al.  Usefulness of Hirsch’s h-index to evaluate scientific research in Spain , 2007, Scientometrics.

[20]  Juan E. Iglesias,et al.  Scaling the h-index for different scientific ISI fields , 2006, Scientometrics.

[21]  L. Egghe.  An improvement of the h-index: the g-index , 2006 .

[22]  Yannis Manolopoulos,et al.  Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks , 2007, Scientometrics.

[23]  Peter Vinkler,et al.  Eminence of scientists in the light of the h-index and other scientometric indicators , 2007, J. Inf. Sci..

[24]  Sune Lehmann,et al.  A quantitative analysis of indicators of scientific performance , 2008, Scientometrics.

[25]  Richard S. J. Tol,et al.  Rational (successive) h-indices: An application to economics in the Republic of Ireland , 2008, Scientometrics.

[26]  M. Kosmulski.  A new Hirsch-type index saves time and works equally well as the original h-index , 2009 .

[27]  Robin K. S. Hankin,et al.  Beyond the Durfee square: Enhancing the h-index to score total publication output , 2008, Scientometrics.

[28]  D. Taber,et al.  Quantifying Publication Impact , 2005, Science.