Supplement feed efficiency of growing beef cattle grazing native Campos grasslands during winter: a collated analysis

Abstract Supplementing growing cattle grazing native subtropical Campos grasslands during winter improves the low, even negative, average daily weight gain (ADG) typical of extensive animal production systems in Uruguay. Nonetheless, to render the practice profitable, it is crucial to control supplement feed efficiency (SFE), that is, the difference in ADG between supplemented and control animals (ADGchng) per unit of supplement dry matter (DM) intake. Little has been studied specifically on how SFE varies in these systems. The objective of this study was to quantify the magnitude and variation in SFE of growing beef cattle grazing stockpiled native Campos grasslands during winter and assess putative associations with herbage, animals, supplements, and climatic variables. We compiled data from supplementation trials carried out in Uruguay between 1993 and 2018, each evaluating between one and six supplementation treatments. The average ADG of unsupplemented and supplemented animals were 0.13 ± 0.174 and 0.49 ± 0.220 kg/animal/day, respectively. In both cases, ADG decreased linearly as the proportion of green herbage in the grazed grassland was lower, but the ADG of unsupplemented animals was further reduced when winter frosts were numerous. Estimated SFE were moderately high, with an average of 0.21 ± 0.076 ADGchng/kg DM, resulting from average ADGchng of 0.38 ± 0.180 kg/animal/day in response to an average supplementation rate of 1.84 ± 0.68 kg supplement DM intake/animal/day (0.86%  ± 0.27% body weight). No association was found between SFE and supplementation rate or type (protein vs. energy-based; P > 0.05), but forage allowance negatively affected it, and herbage mass positively affected it, yet in a smaller magnitude, suggesting that a balance is needed between the two to maximize SFE. Weather conditions during trials affected SFE (P < 0.05), with greater SFE in winters with lower temperatures and more frosts. Daytime grazing time was consistently lower in supplemented animals compared to their unsupplemented counterparts, whereas ruminating time during the day was similar, increasing as the proportion of green herbage decreased. Herbage intake estimated from energy balance suggested the existence of some substitution effect. This agrees with the moderately high SFE and with the total digestible nutrients-to-protein ratio of these subtropical humid grasslands being higher than in semi-arid rangelands and dry-season tropical pastures but lower than in sown pastures.

[1]  Núñez Laura,et al.  What Factors Control the Crude Protein Content Variation of a Basaltic “Campos” Native Grassland of South America? , 2022, Agronomy.

[2]  C. Nabinger,et al.  Deferment associated to contrasting grazing intensities affects root‐shoot biomass allocation in natural grasslands , 2022, Applied Vegetation Science.

[3]  P. Tittonell Beyond CO2: Multiple Ecosystem Services From Ecologically Intensive Grazing Landscapes of South America , 2021, Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems.

[4]  C. Nabinger,et al.  Spring deferment and N-P fertilization in natural grasslands vulnerable to summer water deficit , 2021, Agrociencia Uruguay.

[5]  Enrique Fernandez,et al.  Estimated beef cattle performance under intensive grazing systems in Uruguay , 2021 .

[6]  C. Nabinger,et al.  Native Grasslands at the Core: A New Paradigm of Intensification for the Campos of Southern South America to Increase Economic and Environmental Sustainability , 2021, Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems.

[7]  P. Soca,et al.  Seasonal Effect on Feed Intake and Methane Emissions of Cow–Calf Systems on Native Grassland with Variable Herbage Allowance , 2021, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[8]  M. E. Canozzi,et al.  Effect of pre-slaughter fasting duration on physiology, carcass and meat quality in beef cattle finished on pastures or feedlot. , 2021, Research in veterinary science.

[9]  M. Bowen,et al.  An economic framework to evaluate alternative management strategies for beef enterprises in northern Australia , 2020 .

[10]  Sistemas de suplementación mediante auto-suministro para la mejora de la recría invernal de terneros sobre campo natural en el norte del Uruguay. , 2019, INIA Serie técnica.

[11]  M. D. Carmo,et al.  Demonstrating control of forage allowance for beef cattle grazing Campos grassland in Uruguay to improve system productivity , 2019, Tropical Grasslands-Forrajes Tropicales.

[12]  F. Cazzuli Restricted oats grazing and its frequency of allocation affects calves ́ performance on native grasslands , 2019 .

[13]  G. Horn,et al.  Variability in supplement intake affects performance of beef steers grazing dormant tallgrass prairie , 2018, The Professional Animal Scientist.

[14]  D. Poppi,et al.  Challenges of beef cattle production from tropical pastures , 2018, Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia.

[15]  P. Casanova,et al.  Performance and feed intake of beef heifers on rotational grazing of natural grassland receiving protein and energy supplement in cool season , 2018 .

[16]  F. Montossi,et al.  Self-feeding improved animal performance of calves grazing native grasslands during winter on extensive livestock production systems. , 2018 .

[17]  M. Bowen,et al.  Efficiency of rumen microbial protein synthesis in cattle grazing tropical pastures as estimated by a novel technique , 2017 .

[18]  C. H. Pham,et al.  Responses to various protein and energy supplements by steers fed low-quality tropical hay. 2. Effect of stage of maturity of steers , 2017 .

[19]  D. Briske Rangeland Systems: Foundation for a Conceptual Framework , 2017 .

[20]  W. Rossing,et al.  Land use change and ecosystem service provision in Pampas and Campos grasslands of southern South America , 2016 .

[21]  W. Wales,et al.  Invited review: An evaluation of the likely effects of individualized feeding of concentrate supplements to pasture-based dairy cows. , 2015, Journal of dairy science.

[22]  P. Huhtanen,et al.  An evaluation of the performance and efficiency of nitrogen utilization in cattle fed tropical grass pastures with supplementation , 2014 .

[23]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[24]  G. Erickson,et al.  Impacts of a limit-feeding procedure on variation and accuracy of cattle weights. , 2013, Journal of animal science.

[25]  J. Wilkinson Re-defining efficiency of feed use by livestock. , 2011, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[26]  L. Ribeiro,et al.  Suplementação e desempenho de bovinos de corte em pastagens: tipo de forragem - doi: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v33i2.8130 , 2011 .

[27]  L. Hunt,et al.  Sampling requirements for predicting cattle diet quality using faecal near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (F.NIRS) in heterogeneous tropical rangeland pastures. , 2010 .

[28]  E. Titgemeyer,et al.  Interaction between protein and energy supply on protein utilization in growing cattle: A review , 2008 .

[29]  B. Sowell,et al.  Nonstructural carbohydrate supplementation of yearling heifers and range beef cows. , 2004, Journal of animal science.

[30]  H. T. Purvis,et al.  Effects of supplemental energy and/or degradable intake protein on performance, grazing behavior, intake, digestibility, and fecal and blood indices by beef steers grazed on dormant native tallgrass prairie. , 2003, Journal of animal science.

[31]  G. Horn,et al.  Effects of supplementation on intake, digestion, and performance of beef cattle consuming fertilized, stockpiled bermudagrass forage. , 2002, Journal of animal science.

[32]  C. Stockdale Levels of pasture substitution when concentrates are fed to grazing dairy cows in northern Victoria , 2000 .

[33]  B. Hess,et al.  Optimum supplementation strategies for beef cattle consuming low-quality roughages in the western United States , 2000 .

[34]  L. Sollenberger,et al.  Nitrogen fertilization and supplementation effects on performance of beef heifers grazing limpograss , 1999 .

[35]  J. Moore,et al.  Effects of supplementation on voluntary forage intake, diet digestibility, and animal performance. , 1999, Journal of animal science.

[36]  K. A. Day,et al.  Climate Change in Queensland's Grazing Lands: Ii. An Assessment of the Impact on Animal Production From Native Pastures. , 1998 .

[37]  Pedro Enrique Miguel Soca,et al.  Diet quality and diet selection of steers grazing in a rotational system at four levels of forage allowance on a rangeland , 1995 .

[38]  S. McLennan,et al.  Protein and energy utilization by ruminants at pasture. , 1995, Journal of animal science.

[39]  P. V. Soest,et al.  Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. , 1991, Journal of dairy science.

[40]  D. Cozzolino,et al.  Guía para la alimentación de rumiantes , 1991 .

[41]  G. Horn,et al.  Protein Supplementation of Grazing Livestock: A Review1 , 1990 .

[42]  C. Grainger,et al.  Positive relation between substitution rate and pasture allowance for cows receiving concentrates , 1989 .

[43]  R. Christopherson,et al.  EFFECT OF THE THERMAL ENVIRONMENT ON DIGESTION IN RUMINANTS , 1983 .

[44]  W. Holmes,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF SUPPLEMENTARY FEEDING ON THE HERBAGE INTAKE AND GRAZING BEHAVIOUR OF DRY COWS , 1974 .

[45]  G. Lofgreen,et al.  A proposed method for removing sources of error in beef cattle feeding experiments. , 1960 .