Closing the Loop: An Empirical Investigation of Causality in IT Business Value

Researchers have established that information technology (IT) can improve firms’ productivity. Whether improved productivity leads to additional investment in IT, however, remains largely uninvestigated. In this paper, we consider whether the relationship between productivity and subsequent IT investment might be positive, negative, or ad hoc, and hypothesize that this relationship is positive. We analyze seven years of panel data from 1,223 healthcare firms and present empirical evidence supporting our hypothesis. When our finding is combined with extant research, it becomes reasonable to propose that unidirectional causality does not fully describe the process of IT business value creation. Instead, we argue that existing static models of IT business value with unidirectional causality can be recast as dynamic models that explicitly incorporate multiple time periods and a positive feedback relationship to more accurately capture the complexity of this process. The creation of IT business value can thus be understood as a positive feedback model where productivity in a given time period leads to IT investment in a future time period, where IT investment builds the stock of IT inputs, and where those IT inputs then impact productivity, beginning the cycle anew.

[1]  Prasanna Tambe,et al.  Measuring Information Technology Spillovers , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  D. J. Wu,et al.  IT Implementation Contract Design: Analytical and Experimental Investigation of IT Value, Learning, and Contract Structure , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  Zhiqiang Zheng,et al.  Are New IT-Enabled Investment Opportunities Diminishing for Firms? , 2012, Inf. Syst. Res..

[4]  Landon Kleis,et al.  Information Technology and Intangible Output: The Impact of IT Investment on Innovation Productivity , 2012, Inf. Syst. Res..

[5]  Prasanna Tambe,et al.  The Productivity of Information Technology Investments: New Evidence from IT Labor Data , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[6]  Albert Kagan,et al.  Evaluating Uses Of Information Technology In Health Care Administration , 2011 .

[7]  R. G. Fichman,et al.  Editorial Overview---The Role of Information Systems in Healthcare: Current Research and Future Trends , 2011 .

[8]  Zhao Yong Technical Progress, Capital Formation and Labor Employment:An Analysis of the Channels of FDI Influence on China’s Economic Growth , 2009 .

[9]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  That Makes a Competitive Difference , 2008 .

[10]  Varun Grover,et al.  Business Value of IT: An Essay on Expanding Research Directions to Keep up with the Times , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[11]  B. Kogut,et al.  Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 2007 .

[12]  N. Menachemi,et al.  Hospital Information Technology and Positive Financial Performance: A Different Approach to Finding an ROI , 2006, Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives.

[13]  Gautam Ray,et al.  Information Technology and the Performance of the Customer Service Process: A Resource-Based Analysis , 2005, MIS Q..

[14]  Varun Grover,et al.  Types of Information Technology Capabilities and Their Role in Competitive Advantage: An Empirical Study , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  E. Burton Swanson,et al.  Innovating Mindfully with Information Technology , 2004, MIS Q..

[16]  Matt E. Thatcher,et al.  Understanding the Business Value of Information Technology Investments: Theoretical Evidence from Alternative Market and Cost Structures , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Ram L. Kumar,et al.  A Framework for Assessing the Business Value of Information Technology Infrastructures , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[19]  Terry Anthony Byrd,et al.  The Impact of IT Personnel Skills on IS Infrastructure and Competitive IS , 2004, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[20]  Marshall Van Alstyne,et al.  Why Information Should Influence Productivity , 2004 .

[21]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Special Section: Measuring Business Value of Information Technology in E-Business Environments , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[22]  R. Sohi,et al.  IT competency and firm performance: is organizational learning a missing link? , 2003 .

[23]  Heeseok Lee,et al.  Knowledge Management Enablers, Processes, and Organizational Performance: An Integrative View and Empirical Examination , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Radhika Santhanam,et al.  Issues in Linking Information Technology Capability to Firm Performance , 2003, MIS Q..

[25]  D. J. Wu,et al.  Investment in Enterprise Resource Planning: Business Impact and Productivity Measures , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Matt E. Thatcher,et al.  The Impact of Technology Investments on a Firm’s Production Efficiency, Product Quality, and Productivity , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[27]  J. Stiglitz The Contributions of the Economics of Information to Twentieth Century Economics , 2000 .

[28]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Beyond Computation: Information Technology, Organizational Transformation and Business Performance , 2000 .

[29]  Nirup M. Menon,et al.  Productivity of Information Systems in the Healthcare Industry , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[30]  Mo Adam Mahmood,et al.  Special Issue: Impacts of Information Technology Investment on Organizational Performance , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Beyond the productivity paradox , 1998, CACM.

[32]  Chung-ki Min,et al.  The substitution of information technology for other factors of production: a Firm Level Analysis , 1997 .

[33]  Kannan Srinivasan,et al.  Information Technology Impact on Process Output and Quality , 1997 .

[34]  T. Luehrman What's it worth? A general manager's guide to valuation. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[35]  Thomas B. Marvell,et al.  SPECIFICATION PROBLEMS, POLICE LEVELS, AND CRIME RATES* , 1996 .

[36]  William L. Fuerst,et al.  Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based analysis , 1995 .

[37]  Christina Soh,et al.  How IT Creates Business Value: A Process Theory Synthesis , 1995, ICIS.

[38]  L. Iezzoni,et al.  Measuring hospital efficiency with frontier cost functions. , 1994, Journal of health economics.

[39]  Peter Weill,et al.  The Relationship Between Investment in Information Technology and Firm Performance: A Study of the Valve Manufacturing Sector , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[40]  A. Pakes,et al.  The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment Industry , 1992 .

[41]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  The Economics of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy, and Organization , 1990 .

[42]  Joseph A. Raelin,et al.  The clash of cultures: Managers and professionals , 1986 .

[43]  Marion G. Sobol,et al.  The relationship between computerization and performance: A strategy for maximizing the economic benefits of computerization , 1983, Inf. Manag..

[44]  J. Kimberly,et al.  Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. , 1981, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[45]  Charles H. Kriebei,et al.  An Economics Approach to Modeling the Productivity of Computer Systems , 1980 .

[46]  W H Newman,et al.  Managing not-for-profit enterprises. , 1980, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[47]  Jr. Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Performance and the Use of an Information System , 1975 .

[48]  Dale W. Jorgenson,et al.  The Embodiment Hypothesis , 1966, Journal of Political Economy.