Estimation for Volunteer Panel Web Surveys Using Propensity Score Adjustment and Calibration Adjustment

A combination of propensity score and calibration adjustment is shown to reduce bias in volunteer panel Web surveys. In this combination, the design weights are adjusted by propensity scores to correct for selection bias due to nonrandomized sampling. These adjusted weights are then calibrated to control totals for the target population and correct for coverage bias. The final set of weights is comprised of multiple components, and the estimator of a total no longer takes a linear form. Therefore, approximate methods are needed to derive variance estimates. This study compares three variance estimation methods through simulation. The first method resembles what is used in commercial statistical software based on squared residuals. The second approach uses a variance estimator originally derived for the generalized regression estimator. The third method uses jackknife replication. Results indicate bias reduction is crucial for valid variance estimation and favor the replication method over the other approaches.

[1]  W. G. Cochran The effectiveness of adjustment by subclassification in removing bias in observational studies. , 1968, Biometrics.

[2]  N. Breslow,et al.  The analysis of case-control studies , 1980 .

[3]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[4]  D. Rubin,et al.  Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score , 1984 .

[5]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[6]  Roderick J. A. Little,et al.  Projecting From Advance Data Using Propensity Modeling: An Application to Income and Tax Statistics , 1992 .

[7]  C. Särndal,et al.  Calibration Estimators in Survey Sampling , 1992 .

[8]  Carl-Erik Särndal,et al.  Generalized Raking Procedures in Survey Sampling , 1993 .

[9]  W. Fuller REPLICATION VARIANCE ESTIMATION FOR TWO-PHASE SAMPLES , 1998 .

[10]  J. Bremer,et al.  Correcting Data from Online Surveys for the Effects of Nonrandom Selection and Nonrandom Assignment , 2000 .

[11]  John Bremer,et al.  The Record of Internet-Based Opinion Polls in Predicting the Results of 72 Races in the November 2000 US Elections , 2001 .

[12]  P. Simpson,et al.  Statistical methods in cancer research , 2001, Journal of surgical oncology.

[13]  Richard Valliant,et al.  The effect of multiple weighting steps on variance estimation , 2004 .

[14]  Sunghee Lee STATISTICAL ESTIMATION METHODS IN VOLUNTEER PANEL WEB SURVEYS , 2004 .

[15]  Matthias Schonlau,et al.  A Comparison Between Responses From a Propensity-Weighted Web Survey and an Identical RDD Survey , 2004 .

[16]  P. Kott Using Calibration Weighting to Adjust for Nonresponse and Coverage Errors , 2006 .

[17]  Sunghee Lee Propensity score adjustment as a weighting scheme for volunteer panel web surveys , 2006 .

[18]  Matthias Schonlau,et al.  Are 'Webographic' or Attitudinal Questions Useful for Adjusting Estimates from Web Surveys Using Propensity Scoring? , 2007 .

[19]  Sunghee Lee,et al.  Weighting Telephone Samples Using Propensity Scores , 2007 .

[20]  Lynne Stokes Introduction to Variance Estimation , 2008 .