Barriers to knowledge seeking within MNC teams: Which differences matter most?

Do international or non-international differences between members matter most for multinational corporation (MNC) teams? We consider two types of international differences, arising from geographic locations and national origins, and two types of non-international differences, arising from structural affiliations and demographic attributes. Examining the barriers to knowledge seeking between MNC team members, we argue that whether international or non-international differences create greater barriers depends on whether they are position-based or person-based. Using the Social Relations Model to analyze 13,616 dyadic interactions among 2090 members of 289 teams in a large MNC, we find that, for both international and non-international differences, those that are position-based (i.e., geographic and structural differences) created greater barriers than those that are person-based (i.e., nationality and demographic differences). In addition, familiarity from a prior team reduced the barriers created by international and non-international differences that are position-based more than those that are person-based. We discuss the implications of our study for understanding the micro-foundations of knowledge flows in MNCs.

[1]  Linda Argote,et al.  Individual Experience and Experience Working Together: Predicting Learning Rates from Knowing Who Knows What and Knowing How to Work Together , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[2]  Tsedal B. Neeley,et al.  Language Matters: Status Loss and Achieved Status Distinctions in Global Organizations , 2013, Organ. Sci..

[3]  R. Wageman.  Interdependence and Group Effectiveness , 1995 .

[4]  Deborah H. Gruenfeld,et al.  Group Composition and Decision Making: How Member Familiarity and Information Distribution Affect Process and Performance , 1996 .

[5]  Ram Mudambi,et al.  Conventional and Reverse Knowledge Flows in Multinational Corporations† , 2008 .

[6]  Martin Schulz,et al.  Pathways of Relevance: Exploring Inflows of Knowledge into Subunits of Multinational Corporations , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[7]  Refik Culpan.  The Differentiated Network: Organizing Multinational Corporations for Value Creation , 1997 .

[8]  J. Alberto Espinosa,et al.  Team Boundary Issues Across Multiple Global Firms , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Steven Postrel,et al.  Shared knowledge, “glitches,” and product development performance , 1999 .

[10]  Martine R. Haas,et al.  Acquiring and Applying Knowledge in Transnational Teams: The Roles of Cosmopolitans and Locals , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[11]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  Familiarity, Complexity, and Team Performance in Geographically Distributed Software Development , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[12]  D. Krackhardt,et al.  Bringing the Individual Back in: A Structural Analysis of the Internal Market for Reputation in Organizations , 1994 .

[13]  C. Earley,et al.  Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. , 2000 .

[14]  Debra L. Shapiro,et al.  Managing multinational teams : global perspectives , 2005 .

[15]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  KNOWLEDGE SHARING IN ORGANIZATIONS: MULTIPLE NETWORKS, MULTIPLE PHASES , 2005 .

[16]  José Santos,et al.  From global to metanational: how companies win in the knowledge economy , 2001, UBIQ.

[17]  Charles C. Snow,et al.  When Groups Consist of Multiple Nationalities: Towards a New Understanding of the Implications , 1998 .

[18]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Knowledge Flows Within Multinational Corporations: Explaining Subsidiary Isolation and Its Performance Implications , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[19]  C. C. Snow,et al.  Use transnational teams to globalize your company , 1996 .

[20]  D. Levin,et al.  Connections to distant knowledge: Interpersonal ties between more- and less-developed countries , 2013 .

[21]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[22]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[23]  L. Ross,et al.  Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. , 1981 .

[24]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[25]  David A. Hofmann,et al.  Centering Decisions in Hierarchical Linear Models: Implications for Research in Organizations , 1998 .

[26]  N. Foss,et al.  Governing Knowledge Sharing in Organizations: Levels of Analysis, Governance Mechanisms, and Research Directions , 2010 .

[27]  D. Teece.  Technology Transfer by Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-How , 1977 .

[28]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[29]  Gabriel Szulanski,et al.  Stickiness and the adaptation of organizational practices in cross-border knowledge transfers , 2004 .

[30]  Philippa Pattison,et al.  Manufacturing Relations: An Empirical Study of the Organization of Production Across Multiple Networks , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[31]  Rob Cross,et al.  A Relational View of Information Seeking and Learning in Social Networks , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[32]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Book Review Nisbett, R. , & Ross, L.Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1980. , 1982 .

[33]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Configurations of Strategy and Structure in Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations , 1995 .

[34]  M. Neale,et al.  What Differences Make a Difference? , 2005, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[35]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind , 1991 .

[36]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Marginality and Problem-Solving Effectiveness in Broadcast Search , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[37]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Understanding Conflict in Geographically Distributed Teams: The Moderating Effects of Shared Identity, Shared Context, and Spontaneous Communication , 2005 .

[38]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Organizational Demography: The Differential Effects of Age and Tenure Distributions on Technical Communication , 1989 .

[39]  Denice Welch,et al.  In the shadow: the impact of language on structure, power and communication in the multinational , 1999 .

[40]  Jennifer L. Gibbs,et al.  Unpacking the Concept of Virtuality: The Effects of , 2022 .

[41]  R. Katz,et al.  Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D Project Groups , 1982 .

[42]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Dyadic Data Analysis , 2006 .

[43]  Christophe Van den Bulte,et al.  The Effects of R&D Team Co-Location on Communication Patterns Among R&D, Marketing, and Manufacturing , 1998 .

[44]  Mary Yoko Brannen,et al.  When Mickey Loses Face: Recontextualization, Semantic Fit, and the Semiotics of Foreignness , 2004 .

[45]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation , 1993 .

[46]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  How to Make the Team: Social Networks vs. Demography as Criteria for Designing Effective Teams , 2004 .

[47]  Paul Almeida,et al.  Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: Patent citation analysis in the U.S. semiconductor industry , 1996 .

[48]  C. Gibson,et al.  Culture and international business: recent advances and their implications for future research , 2005 .

[49]  L. H. Pelled.  Demographic Diversity, Conflict, and Work Group Outcomes: An Intervening Process Theory , 1996 .

[50]  D. Harrison,et al.  Beyond Relational Demography: Time and the Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Work Group Cohesion , 1998 .

[51]  C. Cramton.  The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration , 2001 .

[52]  G. Northcraft,et al.  You have printed the following article : Why Differences Make a Difference : A Field Study of Diversity , Conflict , and Performance in Workgroups , 2007 .

[53]  T. Pedersen,et al.  MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and HRM , 2003 .

[54]  J. March,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 1964 .

[55]  Beth A. Bechky.  Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[56]  Thorbjørn Knudsen,et al.  Organization Design: The Epistemic Interdependence Perspective , 2010 .

[57]  James N. Baron,et al.  Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace , 1997 .

[58]  Keld Laursen.  Keep searching and you’ll find: what do we know about variety creation through firms’ search activities for innovation? , 2012 .

[59]  Cristina B. Gibson,et al.  Multinational Work Teams: A New Perspective , 2002 .

[60]  J. Cantwell.  Location and the multinational enterprise , 2009 .

[61]  J. K. Murnighan,et al.  Demographic Diversity and Faultlines: The Compositional DYnamics of Organizational Groups , 1998 .

[62]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. , 1989 .

[63]  M. Tushman,et al.  Boundary Spanning Individuals: Their Role in Information Transfer and Their Antecedents , 1981 .

[64]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  How do multinational companies leverage technological competencies? Moving from single to interdependent explanations , 2004 .

[65]  J. Singer,et al.  Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis , 2003 .

[66]  S. G. Cohen,et al.  What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite , 1997 .

[67]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance , 1992 .

[68]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge flows within multinational corporations , 2000 .

[69]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[70]  Bradley R. Staats,et al.  Team familiarity, role experience, and performance: evidence from indian software services , 2008, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[71]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999 .

[72]  G. Hedlund.  A model of knowledge management and the N‐form corporation , 2007 .

[73]  Mary E. Zellmer-Bruhn,et al.  When and how do differences matter? An exploration of perceived similarity in teams , 2008 .

[74]  Gabriel Szulanski.  Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[75]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Tie and Network Correlates of Individual Performance in Knowledge-Intensive Work , 2004 .

[76]  Andrea B. Hollingshead,et al.  Transactive Memory Systems in Organizations: Matching Tasks, Expertise, and People , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[77]  Torben Pedersen,et al.  Organizing Knowledge Processes in the Multinational Corporation: An Introduction , 2004 .

[78]  H. Triandis,et al.  Cultural Variations in the Cross-Border Transfer of Organizational Knowledge: An Integrative Framework , 2002 .

[79]  D. Dougherty.  Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms , 1992 .

[80]  L. Sproull,et al.  Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams , 2000 .

[81]  D. Byrne.  The Attraction Paradigm , 1971 .

[82]  Annette L. Ranft,et al.  Organizational Learning About New International Markets: Exploring the Internal Transfer of Local Market Knowledge , 2000 .

[83]  T. Newcomb.  The acquaintance process , 1961 .

[84]  N. Ryder.  The cohort as a concept in the study of social change. , 1965, American sociological review.