Market orientation, job satisfaction, product quality, and firm performance: Evidence from China

This article examines the processes by which market orientation (MO) affects performance using a cross‐level approach. The results of a survey of 2,754 employees from 180 firms in China show that organization‐level MO culture leads to unit‐level MO behavior, which improves employee‐level job satisfaction and then product quality, which in turn fosters organizational performance. In particular, MO behavior fully mediates the effects of MO culture on employee satisfaction, product quality, and organizational performance. Leadership quality strengthens the effect of MO culture on unit‐level MO behavior. Moreover, MO behavior enhances firm performance indirectly through employee job satisfaction and product quality. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  G. Hult,et al.  TOWARD GREATER UNDERSTANDING OF MARKET ORIENTATION AND THE RESOURCE-BASED VIEW , 2007 .

[2]  J. Kotter Leading change: why transformation efforts fail , 2009, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[3]  Tom Connor,et al.  Market orientation and performance , 2007 .

[4]  G. Hult,et al.  Does market orientation matter?: a test of the relationship between positional advantage and performance , 2001 .

[5]  Howard Davies,et al.  Emergent patterns of strategy, environment and performance in a transition economy , 2004 .

[6]  V. Zeithaml Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence: , 1988 .

[7]  S. Hunt,et al.  Social responsibility and personal success: Are they incompatible? , 1986 .

[8]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2000 .

[9]  G. Day The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations , 1994 .

[10]  R. Rust,et al.  Customer Satisfaction, Productivity, and Profitability: Differences Between Goods and Services , 1997 .

[11]  Michelle T. Iaffaldano,et al.  Job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. , 1985 .

[12]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[13]  James A. Robinson,et al.  World development report 2006 : equity and development , 2006 .

[14]  Kevin Lane Keller,et al.  MARKETING MANAGEMENT 12e , 2006 .

[15]  James K. Harter,et al.  Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: a meta-analysis. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[16]  B. Schneider,et al.  Which comes first: employee attitudes or organizational financial and market performance? , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[17]  John C. Narver,et al.  The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability , 1990 .

[18]  L. James Aggregation Bias in Estimates of Perceptual Agreement. , 1982 .

[19]  J. Pearce,et al.  Guanxi: Connections As Substitutes for Formal Institutional Support , 1996 .

[20]  Cheri Ostroff The relationship between satisfaction, attitudes, and performance: An organizational level analysis. , 1992 .

[21]  K. Zhou,et al.  The Effects of Strategic Orientations on Technology- and Market-Based Breakthrough Innovations , 2005 .

[22]  中華人民共和国国家統計局 China statistical yearbook , 1988 .

[23]  Richard Makadok Toward a synthesis of the resource‐based and dynamic‐capability views of rent creation , 2001 .

[24]  Detelin S. Elenkov,et al.  Strategic leadership and executive innovation influence: an international multi-cluster comparative study , 2005 .

[25]  J. Barney Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage , 1996 .

[26]  Ahmet H. Kirca,et al.  Market Orientation: A Meta-Analytic Review and Assessment of its Antecedents and Impact on Performance , 2005 .

[27]  John C. Narver,et al.  Strategic Management Journal Research Notes and Communications Customer-led and Market-oriented: Let's Not Confuse the Two , 2022 .

[28]  Christian Homburg,et al.  A Multiple-Layer Model of Market-Oriented Organizational Culture: Measurement Issues and Performance Outcomes , 2000 .

[29]  G. Hult,et al.  MARKET ORIENTATION AND PERFORMANCE: AN INTEGRATION OF DISPARATE APPROACHES , 2005 .

[30]  David J. Ketchen,et al.  AN ASSESSMENT OF THE USE OF STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH , 2004 .

[31]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. , 1990 .

[32]  J. Li The Formation of Managerial Networks of Foreign Firms in China: The Effects of Strategic Orientations , 2005 .

[33]  Justin Tan,et al.  Environment-Strategy Co-Evolution and Co-Alignment: A Staged Model of Chinese Soes Under Transition , 2005 .

[34]  R. Ping A Parsimonious Estimating Technique for Interaction and Quadratic Latent Variables , 1995 .

[35]  J. Farley,et al.  Market-Focused Organizational Transformation in China , 2000 .

[36]  J. Barney Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? Yes , 2001 .

[37]  Richard L. Priem,et al.  Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? , 2001 .

[38]  John F. Sherry,et al.  Creating a Market Orientation: A Longitudinal, Multifirm, Grounded Analysis of Cultural Transformation , 2006 .

[39]  William L. Gardner,et al.  Perceptions of leader charisma and effectiveness: The effects of vision content, delivery, and organizational performance , 1999 .

[40]  Jagdip Singh Performance Productivity and Quality of Frontline Employees in Service Organizations , 2000 .

[41]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences , 1993 .

[42]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[43]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[44]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.