Life satisfaction and satisfaction in domains of life: is it a simple relationship?

This paper studies the nature of the relationship between life satisfaction and satisfaction in domains of life. The domains-of-life literature assumes that a person’s overall satisfaction with his or her life depends on his or her satisfaction in many concrete areas of life, which are classified into a few main domains of life. This paper addresses the issue of what characteristics the relationship between life satisfaction and satisfaction in domains of life has by focusing on its specification. The domains-of-life literature has commonly assumed that an additive relationship between domains satisfaction and life satisfaction does exist. This paper argues that the use of an additive relationship has substantially restricted our comprehension of the relationship; since it makes impossible to empirically address questions such as: Is life satisfaction just a weighted average of domain satisfactions? How easy is it to substitute satisfaction in one domain by satisfaction in another? Is it reasonable to expect similar additional benefits when we continuously improve satisfaction in one domain? What happens with our life satisfaction when we manage to continuously improve satisfaction in all domains? What happens with the importance of one domain when satisfaction in another domain declines? The paper argues that there could be substantial gains in the understanding of the relationship by assuming alternative specifications. At an empirical level the investigation works with four different specifications: an additive relationship, a semi-logarithm relationship, a logarithm–logarithm relationship, and a constant elasticity of substitution (CES) relationship. Using a database from Mexico, the investigation finds out that an additive specification provides – at least for Mexico – a goodness of fit similar to those of alternative specifications. However, there are some relevant issues in the relationship between domains satisfaction and overall life satisfaction that cannot be studied with an additive specification; hence, the␣use of an alternative specification – in particular a CES specification – is preferable if the objective is to understand rather than to predict life satisfaction.

[1]  W. Saris,et al.  Causal direction in a model of life satisfaction: The top-down/bottom-up controversy , 1996 .

[2]  A. Wearing,et al.  The impact of life events and changes in domain satisfactions on well-being , 1984 .

[3]  E. Haavio-Mannila Satisfaction with Family, Work, Leisure and Life Among Men and Women , 1971 .

[4]  J. Mentzer,et al.  A life satisfaction measure based on judgment theory , 1992 .

[5]  Frank M. Andrews,et al.  Social Indicators of Well-Being: Americans' Perceptions of Life Quality , 1976 .

[6]  M. Argyle The Psychology of Happiness , 1986 .

[7]  Robert A. Cummins,et al.  The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos , 1996 .

[8]  W. Zapf German social report. Living conditions and subjective well-being, 1978-1984. , 1987 .

[9]  J. C. Flanagan A research approach to improving our quality of life. , 1978 .

[10]  N. Salvatore,et al.  Appraisal of Lifecolon; ``Area'' Versus ``Dimension'' Conceptualizations , 2001 .

[11]  P. Frijters,et al.  How Important is Methodology for the Estimates of the Determinants of Happiness? , 2004 .

[12]  Andrew J. Oswald,et al.  Preferences over Inflation and Unemployment: Evidence from Surveys of Happiness , 2001 .

[13]  Ada Ferrer-i-Carbonell,et al.  Happiness Quantified: A Satisfaction Calculus Approach , 2004 .

[14]  Paul Frijters,et al.  The Anatomy of Subjective Well-Being , 2001 .

[15]  C. Rampichini,et al.  A Hierarchical Ordinal Probit Model for the Analysis of Life Satisfaction in Italy , 1998 .

[16]  E. Diener,et al.  Subjective well-being. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  P. Converse,et al.  The Quality of American Life: Perceptions, Evaluations, and Satisfactions , 1976 .

[18]  A. Oswald,et al.  Unhappiness and Unemployment , 1994 .

[19]  F. Marcellini,et al.  The Top-Down/Bottom-Up Controversy from a Constructionist Approach. A Method for Measuring Top-Down Effects Applied to a Sample of Older People , 1999 .

[20]  Willem E. Saris,et al.  A comparative Study of Satisfaction with Life in Europe , 1996 .

[21]  Angus Campbell,et al.  The sense of well-being in America , 1981 .

[22]  E. Diener,et al.  Resources, personal strivings, and subjective well-being: a nomothetic and idiographic approach. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Correlations, Causes and Heuristics in Surveys of Life Satisfaction , 1991 .

[24]  D. L. Blenkhorn,et al.  A life satisfaction measure: Additional validational data for the Congruity Life Satisfaction measure , 1995 .

[25]  Frank M. Andrews,et al.  Social Indicators of Well-Being , 1976 .

[26]  P. Varca,et al.  A Comparison Between Bottom–Up, Top–Down, and Bidirectional Models of Relationships Between Global and Life Facet Satisfaction , 1989 .

[27]  Ruut Veenhoven,et al.  Developments in satisfaction-research , 1996 .

[28]  A. Wearing,et al.  Top-down versus bottom-up theories of subjective well-being , 1991 .

[29]  Willem E. Saris,et al.  The Relationship between Subjective Well-being and Domain Satisfactions in South Africa , 2001 .

[30]  A. Coskun Samli,et al.  Marketing and the Quality-of-Life Interface , 1987 .

[31]  A Facet Theory Approach to Examining Overall and Life Facet Satisfaction Relationships , 2000 .