Contributions of feature shapes and surface cues to the recognition and neural representation of facial identity

[1]  H. Ellis,et al.  Face recognition accuracy as a function of mode of representation. , 1978 .

[2]  A. Young,et al.  Face-name interference. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  V. Bruce.  Stability from Variation: The Case of Face Recognition the M.D. Vernon Memorial Lecture , 1994, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[4]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  A. Young,et al.  In the Eye of the Beholder: The Science of Face Perception , 1998 .

[6]  J. A. Pruszynski,et al.  Neural correlates , 2023 .

[7]  Peter J. B. Hancock,et al.  From Pixels to People: A Model of Familiar Face Recognition , 1999 .

[8]  A.J O'Toole,et al.  3D shape and 2D surface textures of human faces: the role of "averages" in attractiveness and age , 1999, Image Vis. Comput..

[9]  H. Leder,et al.  Matching person identity from facial line drawings. , 1999, Perception.

[10]  S. Edelman,et al.  Differential Processing of Objects under Various Viewing Conditions in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 1999, Neuron.

[11]  V. Bruce,et al.  Recognition of unfamiliar faces , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  Bernard Tiddeman,et al.  Prototyping and Transforming Facial Textures for Perception Research , 2001, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[14]  G. Hole,et al.  Effects of Geometric Distortions on Face-Recognition Performance , 2002, Perception.

[15]  D. Maurer,et al.  The many faces of configural processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  M. Seghier,et al.  A network of occipito-temporal face-sensitive areas besides the right middle fusiform gyrus is necessary for normal face processing. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  N. Lavie,et al.  The Role of Perceptual Load in Processing Distractor Faces , 2003, Psychological science.

[18]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  Distinct representations for facial identity and changeable aspects of faces in the human temporal lobe , 2004, NeuroImage.

[20]  A. Treves,et al.  Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face representations in the brain , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  Raymond J. Dolan,et al.  Familiarity enhances invariance of face representations in human ventral visual cortex: fMRI evidence , 2005, NeuroImage.

[22]  Gilles Pourtois,et al.  Portraits or People? Distinct Representations of Face Identity in the Human Visual Cortex , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  P. Hancock,et al.  Robust representations for face recognition: The power of averages , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[24]  H. Wilson,et al.  fMRI evidence for the neural representation of faces , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  I. Biederman,et al.  What makes faces special? , 2006, Vision Research.

[26]  David White,et al.  Face Recognition from Unconstrained Images: Progress with Prototypes , 2006, 7th International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FGR06).

[27]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Probing the Visual Representation of Faces With Adaptation , 2006, Psychological science.

[28]  J. Haxby,et al.  Neural systems for recognition of familiar faces , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  P. Sinha,et al.  Real-World Face Recognition: The Importance of Surface Reflectance Properties , 2007, Perception.

[30]  I. Biederman,et al.  The utility of surface reflectance for the recognition of upright and inverted faces , 2007, Vision Research.

[31]  J. Barton.  Structure and function in acquired prosopagnosia: lessons from a series of 10 patients with brain damage. , 2008, Journal of neuropsychology.

[32]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  Differential sensitivity for viewpoint between familiar and unfamiliar faces in human visual cortex , 2008, NeuroImage.

[33]  G. Yovel,et al.  Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? Toward a new theory of holistic processing , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[34]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  An image-dependent representation of familiar and unfamiliar faces in the human ventral stream , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  Jiye G. Kim,et al.  Adaptation in the fusiform face area (FFA): Image or person? , 2009, Vision Research.

[36]  R. Goebel,et al.  Neural correlates of shape and surface reflectance information in individual faces , 2009, Neuroscience.

[37]  Michael L. Mack,et al.  Holistic processing of faces happens at a glance , 2009, Vision Research.

[38]  R. Tootell,et al.  An anterior temporal face patch in human cortex, predicted by macaque maps , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Recognizing an individual face: 3D shape contributes earlier than 2D surface reflectance information , 2009, NeuroImage.

[40]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  Neural responses to rigidly moving faces displaying shifts in social attention investigated with fMRI and MEG , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  Internal and External Features of the Face Are Represented Holistically in Face-Selective Regions of Visual Cortex , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  James W. Tanaka,et al.  Features, Configuration, and Holistic Face Processing , 2011 .

[43]  Daniel D. Dilks,et al.  Differential selectivity for dynamic versus static information in face-selective cortical regions , 2011, NeuroImage.

[44]  Raymond J. Dolan,et al.  Fusiform Gyrus Face Selectivity Relates to Individual Differences in Facial Recognition Ability , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[45]  A. Burton,et al.  Variability in photos of the same face , 2011, Cognition.

[46]  S. Schweinberger,et al.  Effects of anticaricaturing vs. caricaturing and their neural correlates elucidate a role of shape for face learning , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[47]  Rachel A Robbins,et al.  A Review and Clarification of the Terms “holistic,” “configural,” and “relational” in the Face Perception Literature , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[48]  L. Koessler,et al.  Focal electrical intracerebral stimulation of a face-sensitive area causes transient prosopagnosia , 2012, Neuroscience.

[49]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  Electrical Stimulation of Human Fusiform Face-Selective Regions Distorts Face Perception , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[50]  Richard J. Harris,et al.  Morphing between expressions dissociates continuous from categorical representations of facial expression in the human brain , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  Image-Invariant Responses in Face-Selective Regions Do Not Explain the Perceptual Advantage for Familiar Face Recognition , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[52]  A. Mike Burton,et al.  Why has research in face recognition progressed so slowly? The importance of variability , 2013, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[53]  Tom Hartley,et al.  Low-Level Image Properties of Visual Objects Predict Patterns of Neural Response across Category-Selective Regions of the Ventral Visual Pathway , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[54]  A. Mike Burton,et al.  Tolerance for distorted faces: Challenges to a configural processing account of familiar face recognition , 2014, Cognition.

[55]  Ingrid R. Olson,et al.  Beyond the FFA: The role of the ventral anterior temporal lobes in face processing , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[56]  Claudia Schulz,et al.  Neural correlates of facilitations in face learning by selective caricaturing of facial shape or reflectance , 2014, NeuroImage.

[57]  Galia Avidan,et al.  Impairment of the face processing network in congenital prosopagnosia. , 2014, Frontiers in bioscience.

[58]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  Brain regions involved in processing facial identity and expression are differentially selective for surface and edge information , 2014, NeuroImage.

[59]  B. Rossion,et al.  Supra-additive contribution of shape and surface information to individual face discrimination as revealed by fast periodic visual stimulation. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[60]  Richard J. Harris,et al.  Neural Responses to Expression and Gaze in the Posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus Interact with Facial Identity , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[61]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  Activity in the right fusiform face area predicts the behavioural advantage for the perception of familiar faces , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[62]  Rob Jenkins,et al.  Arguments Against a Configural Processing Account of Familiar Face Recognition , 2015, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[63]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  Spatial properties of objects predict patterns of neural response in the ventral visual pathway , 2016, NeuroImage.

[64]  Rob Jenkins,et al.  Identity From Variation: Representations of Faces Derived From Multiple Instances , 2016, Cogn. Sci..

[65]  Jürgen M. Kaufmann,et al.  Effects of Caricaturing in Shape or Color on Familiarity Decisions for Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces , 2016, PloS one.

[66]  Stefan R Schweinberger,et al.  Dominance of texture over shape in facial identity processing is modulated by individual abilities , 2017, British journal of psychology.