Effect of a decision aid on knowledge and treatment decision making for breast cancer surgery: a randomized trial.

CONTEXT The long-term results of randomized trials have demonstrated equivalent survival rates for mastectomy and breast-conserving therapy for the treatment of early stage breast cancer. Consequently, the choice of treatment should be based on a patient's preferences. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of a decision aid regarding the different surgical treatment options on patient decision making. DESIGN AND SETTING A cluster randomized trial for which general surgeons in the communities of central-west, and eastern Ontario, Canada, were randomly assigned to use the decision aid or not in the surgical consultation. Patients received the decision aid or not based on the surgeon seen. PARTICIPANTS Twenty surgeons participated in the study. Of the 208 eligible women with newly diagnosed clinical stage I or II breast cancer seen by study surgeons, 201 agreed to be evaluated: 94 were assigned to the decision board and 107 to usual practice. Patients were recruited from November 1999 to April 2002. INTERVENTION The decision board is a decision aid designed to help physicians inform their patients about different treatment options and to enable patients to express a preference for treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Patient knowledge about the surgical treatment of breast cancer; decisional conflict; satisfaction with decision making; and the treatment decision following the consultation. RESULTS Patients in the decision board group had higher knowledge scores about their treatment options (66.9 vs 58.7; P<.001), had less decisional conflict (1.40 vs 1.62, P =.02), and were more satisfied with decision making (4.50 vs 4.32, P =.05) following the consultation. Patients who used the decision board were more likely to choose BCT (94% vs 76%, P =.03). CONCLUSIONS The decision board was helpful in improving communication and enabling women to make a choice regarding treatment. Such instruments should be considered by surgeons when communicating the different surgical options to women with breast cancer.

[1]  D. Streiner,et al.  Patients' preferences for therapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: development, testing, and application of a bedside decision instrument. , 1996, Gynecologic oncology.

[2]  C. Spielberger,et al.  Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory , 1970 .

[3]  C Estabrooks,et al.  Decision aids: are they worth it? A systematic review , 2001, Journal of health services research & policy.

[4]  Richard B. Lewis,et al.  AV instruction--technology, media, and methods , 1973 .

[5]  R. Street,et al.  Increasing patient involvement in choosing treatment for early breast cancer , 1995, Cancer.

[6]  B Fisher,et al.  Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  J F Wilson,et al.  Breast-conserving therapy vs mastectomy in early-stage breast cancer: a meta-analysis of 10-year survival. , 1997, The cancer journal from Scientific American.

[8]  Amiram Gafni,et al.  Helping patients make informed choices: a randomized trial of a decision aid for adjuvant chemotherapy in lymph node-negative breast cancer. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[9]  J. Gurwitz,et al.  Use of breast-conserving surgery for treatment of stage I and stage II breast cancer. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  C. Charles,et al.  Lessons learned from the Decision Board: a unique and evolving decision aid , 2000, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[11]  Peter Tugwell,et al.  A qualitative study of physicians' perceptions of three decision aids. , 2003, Patient education and counseling.

[12]  Y. Hwang,et al.  Communication between physicians and older women with localized breast cancer: implications for treatment and patient satisfaction. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  C. Charles,et al.  Impact of cancer-related decision aids. , 2002, Evidence report/technology assessment.

[14]  A. O'Connor.  Validation of a Decisional Conflict Scale , 1995, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[15]  N. Laird,et al.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials. , 1986, Controlled clinical trials.

[16]  A. O'Connor,et al.  Randomized Trial of a Patient Decision Aid for Choice of Surgical Treatment for Breast Cancer , 2001, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[17]  Albert G Mulley,et al.  Standard consultations are not enough to ensure decision quality regarding preference-sensitive options. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[18]  A Gafni,et al.  Mastectomy or lumpectomy? Helping women make informed choices. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  Jong-Hyeon Jeong,et al.  Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  A. Luini,et al.  Comparing radical mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in patients with small cancers of the breast. , 1982, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  E van der Schueren,et al.  Randomized clinical trial to assess the value of breast-conserving therapy in stage I and II breast cancer, EORTC 10801 trial. , 1992, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[22]  N K Aaronson,et al.  Quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients treated with radical mastectomy or breast-conserving procedures: results of EORTC Trial 10801. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Breast Cancer Co-operative Group (BCCG). , 1998, European journal of cancer.

[23]  Umberto Veronesi,et al.  Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  D. Falvo.  Effective patient education : a guide to increased compliance , 1994 .

[25]  P. Maguire,et al.  Communicate with cancer patients: 1. Handling bad news and difficult questions. , 1988, BMJ.

[26]  David M. Murray,et al.  Design and Analysis of Group- Randomized Trials , 1998 .

[27]  S. Edge,et al.  Treatment of early-stage breast cancer. , 1999, Current problems in cancer.

[28]  M. Morrow,et al.  Results of the Lynn Sage Second‐Opinion Program for local therapy in patients with breast carcinoma , 2002, Cancer.

[29]  M Baum,et al.  Psychological outcomes of different treatment policies in women with early breast cancer outside a clinical trial. , 1990, BMJ.

[30]  B. E. F. Isher,et al.  Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. , 2002 .

[31]  A S Lichter,et al.  Mastectomy versus breast-conserving therapy in the treatment of stage I and II carcinoma of the breast: a randomized trial at the National Cancer Institute. , 1992, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  R. Arriagada,et al.  Ten-year results of a randomized trial comparing a conservative treatment to mastectomy in early breast cancer. , 1989, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[33]  A Gafni,et al.  The practice guidelines development cycle: a conceptual tool for practice guidelines development and implementation. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[34]  D. Streiner,et al.  Breast irradiation postlumpectomy: development and evaluation of a decision instrument. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[35]  P M Bossuyt,et al.  Decision support for patients with early-stage breast cancer: effects of an interactive breast cancer CDROM on treatment decision, satisfaction, and quality of life. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[36]  S G Thompson,et al.  The design and analysis of paired cluster randomized trials: an application of meta-analysis techniques. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[37]  K. Kahn,et al.  Proposed agenda for the measurement of quality-of-care outcomes in oncology practice. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[38]  C. G. Costello,et al.  Measuring depressive symptoms in illness populations: Psychometric properties of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) Scale , 1988 .

[39]  M. Jefford,et al.  Informing and involving cancer patients in their own care. , 2002, The Lancet. Oncology.

[40]  A. Moyer,et al.  Psychosocial outcomes of breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy: a meta-analytic review. , 1997, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[41]  H. Mouridsen,et al.  Danish randomized trial comparing breast conservation therapy with mastectomy: six years of life-table analysis. Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. , 1992, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[42]  A. Gafni,et al.  A Bedside Decision Instrument To Elicit a Patient's Preference Concerning Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[43]  F. Hsieh,et al.  Sample size formulae for intervention studies with the cluster as unit of randomization. , 1988, Statistics in medicine.