Group information management

Activities of PIM are often embedded in group or organizational contexts. To work effectively within a group, an individual must manage information not only for his or her personal use but also to share with other members of the group. Obviously, one would like to leverage the activities of others around. Being able to obtain telephone numbers, schedule group meetings, determine the availability of one’s peers, and obtain important collaborative information is invaluable. What are the issues, if any, in leveraging the work of others, in order to incorporate their calendar, contacts, and other information into one’s own PIM system? And what would be involved in sharing one’s own data for use by others?

[1]  Liam J. Bannon,et al.  Constructing Common Information Spaces , 1997, ECSCW.

[2]  A. Young.  Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. , 2001 .

[3]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  The vocabulary problem in human-system communication , 1987, CACM.

[4]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Predictors of availability in home life context-mediated communication , 2004, CSCW.

[5]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Why CSCW applications fail: problems in the adoption of interdependent work tools , 1990, CSCW '90.

[6]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Continual Permutations of Action. , 1993 .

[7]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Informing the design of calendar systems for domestic use. , 2003 .

[8]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Social, individual and technological issues for groupware calendar systems , 1999, CHI '99.

[9]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  Achieving safety: a field study of boundary objects in aircraft technical support , 2002, CSCW '02.

[10]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Learning from Notes: organizational issues in groupware implementation , 1992, CSCW '92.

[11]  STEVE WHITTAKER,et al.  The character, value, and management of personal paper archives , 2001, TCHI.

[12]  Alex S. Taylor,et al.  Designs for home life , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[13]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Information and context: lessons from the study of two shared information systems , 1993, COCS '93.

[14]  Lucy Suchman.  Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[15]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Do categories have politics? , 1993, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[16]  Robin Jeffries,et al.  Where did you put it? Issues in the design and use of a group memory , 1993, INTERCHI.

[17]  James A. Hendler,et al.  The Semantic Web" in Scientific American , 2001 .

[18]  E. Goffman.  The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[19]  Tom Rodden,et al.  At home with the technology: an ethnographic study of a set-top-box trial , 1999, TCHI.

[20]  Karen Ruhleder,et al.  Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Domestic Routines and Design for the Home , 2004, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[22]  W. Orlikowski.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000 .

[23]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Research on Computer Supported Cooperative Work , 1997 .

[24]  Christena Nippert-Eng.  Home and Work: Negotiating Boundaries through Everyday Life , 1996 .

[25]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Design at Work , 1992 .

[26]  Debby Hindus,et al.  Casablanca: designing social communication devices for the home , 2001, CHI 2001.

[27]  Alex S. Taylor,et al.  Notes on fridge surfaces , 2005, CHI EA '05.

[28]  Valerie Frissen.  ICTs in the Rush Hour of Life , 2000, Inf. Soc..

[29]  Scott E. Hudson,et al.  Techniques for addressing fundamental privacy and disruption tradeoffs in awareness support systems , 1996, CSCW '96.

[30]  Alex S. Taylor,et al.  List making in the home , 2004, CSCW.

[31]  John C. Tang,et al.  Rhythm modeling, visualizations and applications , 2003, UIST '03.

[32]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Power, politics, and MIS implementation , 1987, CACM.

[33]  Richard Bentley,et al.  The World Wide Web as Enabling Technology for CSCW: The Case of BSCW , 1997, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[34]  Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.  The social-technical design circle , 1996, CSCW '96.

[35]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[36]  Alex S. Taylor,et al.  Artful systems in the home , 2005, CHI.

[37]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Discretionary Adoption of Group Support Software: Lessons from Calendar Applications , 2003, Implementing Collaboration Technologies in Industry.

[38]  Christine Halverson,et al.  Organizational Memory as Objects, Processes, and Trajectories: An Examination of Organizational Memory in Use , 2004, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[39]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap Between Social Requirements and Technical Feasibility , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[40]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  Patterns of sharing customizable software , 1990, CSCW '90.

[41]  Wayne G. Lutters,et al.  Understanding the micronote lifecycle: improving mobile support for informal note taking , 2004, CHI.

[42]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Toward A Theory of Knowledge Reuse : Types of Knowledge Reuse Situations and Factors in Reuse Success , 2022 .