Thinking with Bourdieu against Bourdieu: A ‘Practical’ Critique of the Habitus

There are two strands in Bourdieu's sociological writings. On the one hand, Bourdieu argues for a theoretical position one might term his “practical theory” which emphasizes virtuosic interactions between individuals. On the other hand, and most frequently, Bourdieu appeals to the concept of the habitus according to which society consists of objective structures and determined—and isolated—individuals. Although Bourdieu believes that the habitus is compatible with his practical theory and overcomes the impasse of objectivism and subjectivism in social theory, neither claim is the case; the habitus is incompatible with his practical theory, and it retreats quickly into objectivism. However, Bourdieu's practical theory does offer a way out of the impasse of objectivism and subjectivism by focussing on the intersubjective interactions between individuals.

[1]  M. Archer.  Culture and Agency: The Place of Culture in Social Theory , 1996 .

[2]  E. Shils.  The Constitution Of Society , 1982 .

[3]  Bridget Fowler.  An Introduction to Pierre Bourdieu's `Understanding' , 1996 .

[4]  David J. Will.  A realist theory of science , 1981, Medical History.

[5]  Rogers Brubaker.  Rethinking classical theory , 1985 .

[6]  Loïc Wacquant.  Symbolic Violence and the Making of the French Agriculturalist: An Enquiry into Pierre Bourdieu's Sociology , 1987 .

[7]  D. Milovanović.  Book Review: The Theory of Communicative Action Vol. Two, Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason , 1989 .

[8]  H. Gadamer,et al.  Truth and Method , 1960 .

[9]  D. Gartman.  Culture as Class Symbolization or Mass Reification? A Critique of Bourdieu's Distinction , 1991, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  T. Evens.  Bourdieu and the Logic of Practice: Is all Giving Indian-Giving or is “Generalized Materialism” not Enough? , 1999, Sociological Theory.

[11]  M. Archer.  Process without system , 1983, European Journal of Sociology.

[12]  P. Bourdieu.  The State Nobility , 1996 .

[13]  J. Habermas.  Theory of Communicative Action , 1981 .

[14]  R. Harker,et al.  On Reproduction, Habitus and Education. , 1984 .

[15]  C. Whitbeck,et al.  A Realist Theory of Science. , 1977 .

[16]  R. Jenkins.  Pierre Bourdieu and the Reproduction of Determinism , 1982 .

[17]  Jacques Bidet,et al.  Questions To Pierre Bourdieu , 1979 .

[18]  P. Bourdieu,et al.  Reproduction in education, society and culture , 1970 .

[19]  M. Archer,et al.  Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach , 1997 .

[20]  J. Habermas.  The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity , 1985 .

[21]  Roy Bhaskar,et al.  Philosophy And The Idea Of Freedom , 1991 .

[22]  Norbert Elias,et al.  What Is Sociology , 1978 .

[23]  M. Archer.  Social Integration and System Integration: Developing the Distinction , 1996 .

[24]  Pierre Bourdieu,et al.  The political ontology of Martin Heidegger , 1991 .

[25]  A. Giddens.  Central Problems In Social Theory , 1979 .

[26]  Theodore R. Schatzki,et al.  Practices and Actions A Wittgensteinian Critique of Bourdieu and Giddens , 1997 .

[27]  Anthony King,et al.  The Impossibility of Naturalism: The Antinomies of Bhaskar’s Realism , 1999 .

[28]  R. Bhaskar.  Dialectic: The Pulse of Freedom , 1993 .

[29]  P. Pettit.  The Possibility of Naturalism. , 1981 .

[30]  Pekka Sulkunen,et al.  Society Made Visible - on the Cultural Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu , 1982 .

[31]  D. Swartz.  Pierre Bourdieu: The Cultural Transmission of Social Inequality , 1977 .

[32]  H. Gadamer,et al.  Truth and Method , 1960 .

[33]  T. Schatzki.  Overdue analysis of Bourdieu's theory of practice , 1987 .

[34]  N. Garnham,et al.  Pierre Bourdieu and the sociology of culture: an introduction , 1980 .

[35]  A. King.  The Accidental Derogation of the Lay Actor , 2000 .

[36]  Charles Taylor,et al.  Interpretation and the sciences of man , 1973 .

[37]  P. Bourdieu.  Vive la crise! , 1988 .

[38]  P. Bourdieu.  Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste* , 2018, Food and Culture.

[39]  Paul DiMaggio.  On Pierre Bourdieu , 1979, American Journal of Sociology.

[40]  Karen L. Gorder.  Understanding School Knowledge: A Critical Appraisal of Basil Bernstein and Pierre Bourdieu. , 1980 .

[41]  Derek Layder,et al.  Structure, interaction and social theory , 1981 .

[42]  N. Mouzelis.  Sociological Theory: What went Wrong?: Diagnosis and Remedies , 1995 .

[43]  Anthony King,et al.  Against Structure: A Critique of Morphogenetic Social Theory , 1999 .

[44]  C. Calhoun,et al.  Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives , 1994 .

[45]  N. Garnham.  Extended Review: Bourdieu's Distinction: Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste , 1986 .

[46]  R. Bhaskar.  Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation , 1986 .

[47]  A. Giddens.  The Constitution of Society , 1985 .

[48]  P. Winch.  The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy , 1960 .

[49]  Pierre Bourdieu,et al.  Outline of a Theory of Practice , 2020, On Violence.

[50]  P. Bourdieu,et al.  实践与反思 : 反思社会学导引 = An invitation to reflexive sociology , 1994 .

[51]  M. Lamont,et al.  CULTURAL CAPITAL: ALLUSIONS, GAPS AND GLISSANDOS IN RECENT THEORETICAL DEVELOPMENTS* , 1988 .

[52]  Rogers Brubaker,et al.  Social Theory as Habitus , 1993 .