The nervous system uses internal models to achieve sensory integration

All linear accelerometers measure gravito-inertial force, which is the sum of gravitational force (tilt) and inertial force due to linear acceleration (translation). Neural strategies must exist to elicit tilt and translation responses from this ambiguous cue. To investigate these neural processes, we developed a model of human responses and simulated a number of motion paradigms used to investigate this tilt/translation ambiguity. In this model, the separation of GIF into neural estimates of gravity and linear acceleration is accomplished via an internal model made up of 3 principal components: 1) the influence of rotational cues (e.g., semicircular canals) on the neural representation of gravity, 2) the resolution of gravito-inertial force into neural representations of gravity and linear acceleration, and 3) the neural representation of the dynamics of the semicircular canals. By combining these simple hypotheses within the internal model framework, the model mimics human translation and tilt responses for preliminary data from one human subject. These modeled response characteristics are consistent with preliminary data and with the hypothesis that the nervous system uses internal models to estimate tilt and translation in the presence of ambiguous sensory cues.

[1]  D M Merfeld,et al.  Humans use internal models to estimate gravity and linear acceleration , 1999, Nature.

[2]  A GRAYBIEL,et al.  THE EFFECT OF CHANGING THE RESULTANT LINEAR ACCELERATION RELATIVE TO THE SUBJECT ON NYSTAGMUS GENERATED BY ANGULAR ACCELERATION. , 1964, Aeromedica acta.

[3]  R. Peterka,et al.  Neural processing of gravito-inertial cues in humans. I. Influence of the semicircular canals following post-rotatory tilt. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  L. Young,et al.  The vestibulo-ocular reflex of the squirrel monkey during eccentric rotation and roll tilt , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  G D Paige,et al.  Dynamics of squirrel monkey linear vestibuloocular reflex and interactions with fixation distance. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration. , 1995, Science.

[7]  D. Merfeld Modeling the vestibulo-ocular reflex of the squirrel monkey during eccentric rotation and roll tilt , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  Christian Darlot,et al.  Using sensory weighting to model the influence of canal, otolith and visual cues on spatial orientation and eye movements , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[9]  L. Zupan,et al.  Neural processing of gravito-inertial cues in humans. II. Influence of the semicircular canals during eccentric rotation. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  G D Paige,et al.  Vestibuloocular reflex and its interactions with visual following mechanisms in the squirrel monkey. I. Response characteristics in normal animals. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  E. Holst,et al.  Einfluß des Bogengangsystems auf die “subjektive Lotrechte” beim Menschen , 2004, Naturwissenschaften.

[12]  A.D. Kuo,et al.  An optimal control model for analyzing human postural balance , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  L. Young,et al.  Effects of linear acceleration on vestibular nystagmus , 1968 .

[14]  A. Graybiel,et al.  Contributing factors in the perception of the oculogravic illusion. , 1963, The American journal of psychology.

[15]  B J Hess,et al.  Computation of Inertial Motion: Neural Strategies to Resolve Ambiguous Otolith Information , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  R. Mayne,et al.  A Systems Concept of the Vestibular Organs , 1974 .

[17]  A. Graybiel,et al.  The Delay in Visual Reorientation following Exposure to a Change in Direction of Resultant Force on a Human Centrifuge , 1951 .

[18]  F E Guedry,et al.  The effect of semicircular cana stimulation during tilting on the subsequent perception of the visual vertical. , 1970, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[19]  J. Goldberg,et al.  Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. I. Response to static tilts and to long-duration centrifugal force. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  R. Held,et al.  Moving Visual Scenes Influence the Apparent Direction of Gravity , 1972, Science.

[21]  J. Goldberg,et al.  Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating semicircular canals of the squirrel monkey. II. Response to sinusoidal stimulation and dynamics of peripheral vestibular system. , 1971, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  Laurence R. Young,et al.  Spatial orientation in the squirrel monkey: An experimental and theoretical investigation , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  L. Zupan,et al.  Neural processing of gravitoinertial cues in humans. III. Modeling tilt and translation responses. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  L. Young,et al.  A multidimensional model of the effect of gravity on the spatial orientation of the monkey. , 1993, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[25]  S. H. Seidman,et al.  Tilt perception during dynamic linear acceleration , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  D M Merfeld,et al.  Neural processing of gravito-inertial cues in humans. IV. Influence of visual rotational cues during roll optokinetic stimuli. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  D E Angelaki,et al.  Vestibular Discrimination of Gravity and Translational Acceleration , 2001, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[28]  A. Graybiel,et al.  Factors contributing to the delay in the perception of the oculogravic illusion. , 1966, The American journal of psychology.

[29]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  Computational nature of human adaptive control during learning of reaching movements in force fields , 1999, Biological Cybernetics.

[30]  B. Hess,et al.  Oculomotor control of primary eye position discriminates between translation and tilt. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.