Lessons from the ring current injection during the September 24, 25, 1998 storm

Because the conditions in the solar wind that lead to the injection of energetic particles into the ring current simultaneously affect a variety of geomagnetic phenomena, it is often difficult to determine whether these magnetospheric processes are causally related or are simply contemporaneous. The sequence of interplanetary conditions leading up to the September 24–25, 1998 geomagnetic storm are particularly suited to illustrating what conditions lead to significant activity in the auroral zone as distinct from the injection into the ring current. This interval illustrates that the magnetosphere requires a period of strong, steady, not time‐varying, convection for the buildup of the ring current, and that the AE index cannot be used to forecast the ring current buildup. Furthermore, when the ring current reached its peak strength, it contained 6 PJ and was dissipating energy at a rate of about 0.4 TW. The northern auroral regions and southern added another 1.2 TW of dissipation. This rate of dissipation could be maintained readily by the mechanical energy flux of the solar wind of about 40 TW but would require coupling to much of the incident solar‐wind Poynting flux if that were the sole energy source.

[1]  A. Lui,et al.  Tutorial on geomagnetic storms and substorms , 2000 .

[2]  V. Angelopoulos,et al.  Plasmaspheric depletion and refilling associated with the September 25, 1998 magnetic storm observed by ground magnetometers at L = 2 , 2000 .

[3]  T. Moore,et al.  Ionospheric mass ejection in response to a CME , 1999 .

[4]  T. Moore,et al.  Sudden compression of the outer magnetosphere associated with an ionospheric mass ejection , 1999 .

[5]  W. J. Burke,et al.  Geoeffective interplanetary scale sizes derived from regression analysis of polar cap potentials , 1999 .

[6]  D. Baker,et al.  A Possible Interpretation of Cold Ion Beams in the Earth's Tail Lobe , 1996 .

[7]  Margaret W. Chen,et al.  Stormtime transport of ring current and radiation belt ions , 1993 .

[8]  Y. Kamide,et al.  Cross-polar cap potential difference, auroral electrojet indices, and solar wind parameters , 1992 .

[9]  G. Gloeckler,et al.  Ring current development during the great geomagnetic storm of February 1986 , 1988 .

[10]  Arthur D. Richmond,et al.  Mapping electrodynamic features of the high-latitude ionosphere from localized observations: technique , 1988 .

[11]  C. Russell,et al.  An empirical relationship between interplanetary conditions and Dst , 1975 .

[12]  C. Russell,et al.  On the cause of geomagnetic storms , 1974 .

[13]  T. Davis,et al.  The relationship between polar magnetic activity DP and growth of the geomagnetic ring current , 1967 .

[14]  S. Chapman,et al.  A New Theory of Magnetic Storms. , 1930, Nature.