Dosimetric characterization of a dedicated breast computed tomography clinical prototype.

PURPOSE To investigate the glandular dose magnitudes and characteristics resulting from image acquisition using a dedicated breast computed tomography (BCT) clinical prototype imaging system. METHODS The x-ray spectrum and output characteristics of a BCT clinical prototype (Koning Corporation, West Henrietta, NY) were determined using empirical measurements, breast phantoms, and an established spectrum model. The geometry of the BCT system was replicated in a Monte Carlo-based computer simulation using theGEANT4 toolkit and was validated by comparing the simulated results for exposure distribution in a standard 16 cm CT head phantom with those empirically determined using a 10 cm CT pencil ionization chamber and dosimeter. The computer simulation was further validated by replicating the results of a previous BCT dosimetry study. Upon validation, the computer simulation was modified to include breasts of varying sizes and homogeneous compositions spanning those encountered clinically, and the normalized mean glandular dose resulting from BCT was determined. Using the system's measured exposure output determined automatically for breasts of different size and density, the mean glandular dose for these breasts was computed and compared to the glandular dose resulting from mammography. Finally, additional Monte Carlo simulations were performed to study how the glandular dose values vary within the breast tissue during acquisition with both this BCT prototype and a typical craniocaudal (CC) mammographic acquisition. RESULTS This BCT prototype uses an x-ray spectrum with a first half-value layer of 1.39 mm Al and a mean x-ray energy of 30.3 keV. The normalized mean glandular dose for breasts of varying size and composition during BCT acquisition with this system ranges from 0.278 to 0.582 mGy/mGy air kerma with the reference air kerma measured in air at the center of rotation. Using the measured exposure outputs for the tube currents automatically selected by the system for the breasts of different sizes and densities, the mean glandular dose for a BCT acquisition with this prototype system varies from 5.6 to 17.5 mGy, with the value for a breast of mean size and composition being 17.06 mGy. The glandular dose throughout the breast tissue of this mean breast varies by up to ±50% of the mean value. During a typical CC view mammographic acquisition of an equivalent mean breast, which typically results in a mean glandular dose of 2.0-2.5 mGy, the glandular dose throughout the breast tissue varies from∼15% to ∼400% of the mean value. CONCLUSIONS Acquisition of a BCT image with the automated tube output settings for a mean breast with the Koning Corp. clinical prototype results in mean glandular dose values approximately equivalent to three to five two-view mammographic examinations for a similar breast. For all breast sizes and compositions studied, this glandular dose ratio between acquisition with this BCT prototype and two-view mammography ranges from 1.4 to 7.2. In mammography, portions of the mean-sized breast receive a considerably higher dose than the mean value for the whole breast. However, only a small portion of a breast undergoing mammography would receive a glandular dose similar to that from BCT.

[1]  J. Boone,et al.  Dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience. , 2008, Radiology.

[2]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Computation of the glandular radiation dose in digital tomosynthesis of the breast. , 2006, Medical physics.

[3]  J. Boone Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for arbitrary X-ray spectra in mammography: computer-fit values of Monte Carlo derived data. , 2002, Medical physics.

[4]  J. Boone,et al.  The effect of skin thickness determined using breast CT on mammographic dosimetry. , 2008, Medical physics.

[5]  D. Conover,et al.  Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Breast Imaging , 2009 .

[6]  J. S. Laughlin,et al.  Absorbed radiation dose in mammography. , 1979, Radiology.

[7]  X Liu,et al.  A post-reconstruction method to correct cupping artifacts in cone beam breast computed tomography. , 2007, Medical physics.

[8]  J. Boone,et al.  Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment. , 1999, Radiology.

[9]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Monte Carlo and phantom study of the radiation dose to the body from dedicated CT of the breast. , 2008, Radiology.

[10]  Stephen J Glick,et al.  Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for flat-panel CT breast imaging. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  S. Incerti,et al.  Geant4 developments and applications , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[12]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Scatter radiation in digital tomosynthesis of the breast. , 2007, Medical physics.

[13]  Samta Thacker,et al.  Evaluating the impact of X-ray spectral shape on image quality in flat-panel CT breast imaging. , 2007, Medical physics.

[14]  Aruna A. Vedula,et al.  A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging. , 2006, Medical physics.

[15]  T R Nelson,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of DgN(CT) coefficients for pendant-geometry cone-beam breast computed tomography. , 2004, Medical physics.

[16]  Masatoshi Saito,et al.  Dual-energy approach to contrast-enhanced mammography using the balanced filter method: spectral optimization and preliminary phantom measurement. , 2007, Medical physics.

[17]  J. Boone,et al.  Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation. , 2001, Radiology.

[18]  Ruola Ning,et al.  NPS characterization and evaluation of a cone beam CT breast imaging system. , 2009, Journal of X-ray science and technology.

[19]  John M. Boone,et al.  Computed Tomography for Imaging the Breast , 2006, Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia.

[20]  Carl J. D'Orsi,et al.  Glandular radiation dose in tomosynthesis of the breast using tungsten targets , 2008, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[21]  S. Evans Catalogue of Diagnostic X-Ray Spectra and Other Data , 1998 .

[22]  Yong Yu,et al.  A novel cone beam breast CT scanner: system evaluation , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[23]  A. Proto Radiology 1999: New Feature—Viewpoint , 1999 .

[24]  M J Yaffe,et al.  The myth of the 50-50 breast. , 2009, Medical physics.

[25]  Ruola Ning,et al.  Composite modulation transfer function evaluation of a cone beam computed tomography breast imaging system , 2009 .

[26]  Ruola Ning,et al.  Flat-panel-detector-based cone-beam volume CT breast imaging: phantom and specimen study , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[27]  Huiguang He,et al.  Preliminary system characterization of flat-panel-detector-based cone-beam CT for breast imaging , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[28]  John M Boone,et al.  Technique factors and their relationship to radiation dose in pendant geometry breast CT. , 2005, Medical physics.

[29]  Biao Chen,et al.  Cone-beam volume CT breast imaging: feasibility study. , 2002, Medical physics.

[30]  Constantine Gatsonis,et al.  Comparison of acquisition parameters and breast dose in digital mammography and screen-film mammography in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.