THE COMPLEXITIES OF COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IN ICT FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS: THE CASE OF "OUR VOICES"

Community participation is often suggested as a means to a relevant, contextual rural information system (such as a telecentre). Yet, the ICT for development field has much to learn from development literature on the complexities of community participation. We first review the critical literature on participation in development and then analyze our case against this. Findings from our ethnographic study on a village community radio and IT project in south India show that even though the project is contextual (for example, it disseminates local information in an audio rather than written format) and participatory (for example, it conducted a Participatory Rural Appraisal and has a management committee drawn from the community), it faces a number of challenges ‐ participation is a top-down concept and the “insiders” learn what the “outsiders” want to hear, rather than vice versa as Chambers hoped for in his work on participation. Finally, even though the villagers are interested, they find a lack of time to participate. The research concludes that community participation in rural information systems projects is far more complex and contradictory than “ICT for development” implementers have described so far.

[1]  Subversion and Social Change in Colombia , 1969 .

[2]  Paulo Freire,et al.  Pedagogy of the Oppressed , 2019, Toward a Just World Order.

[3]  PARTICIPATORY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS SOME CONCLUSIONS FROM RESEARCH , 1981 .

[4]  R. Chambers,et al.  Rural Development: Putting the last first , 1983 .

[5]  T. Byres.  Rural development: putting the last first , 1984 .

[6]  M. Agar.  Speaking of ethnography , 1985 .

[7]  I. Lewis.  Social Anthropology in Perspective: The Relevance of Social Anthropology , 1986 .

[8]  M. Hammersley.  What's Wrong With Ethnography? , 1991 .

[9]  Richard Bentley,et al.  Ethnographically-informed systems design for air traffic control , 1992, CSCW '92.

[10]  M. Hammersley.  What's Wrong With Ethnography?: Methodological Explorations , 1992 .

[11]  S. Bhatnagar,et al.  Social implications of computers in developing countries , 1992 .

[12]  Bhuvan Bhatnagar,et al.  Participatory Development and the World Bank , 1992 .

[13]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development , 1993, MIS Q..

[14]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[15]  R. Chambers.  Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): Challenges, potentials and paradigm , 1994 .

[16]  Gary Craig,et al.  Community empowerment : a reader in participation and development , 1995 .

[17]  Francis Phil Carspecken.  Critical Ethnography in Educational Research: A Theoretical and Practical Guide , 1995 .

[18]  S. Wright,et al.  Power and Participatory Development: Theory and Practice , 1995 .

[19]  S. White.  Depoliticising development: The uses and abuses of participation , 1996 .

[20]  Susan Jungck,et al.  Critical Ethnography in Educational Research: A Theoretical and Practical Guide. Phil Francis Carspecken , 1996 .

[21]  D. Lewis,et al.  Anthropology, Development, And The Post-Modern Challenge , 1996 .

[22]  R. Chambers.  Whose Reality Counts?: Putting the First Last , 1997 .

[23]  Victoria J. Michener.  The participatory approach: Contradiction and co-option in Burkina Faso , 1998 .

[24]  Scott Grills.  Doing ethnographic research : fieldwork settings , 1998 .

[25]  Jean J. Schensul,et al.  Designing & conducting ethnographic research , 1999 .

[26]  Richard Heeks,et al.  The Tyranny of Participation in Information Systems: Learning from Development Projects , 1999 .

[27]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  Investigating Information Systems with Ethnographic Research , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Eileen Moore Trauth,et al.  The Culture of an Information Economy: Influences and Impacts in the Republic of Ireland , 2000 .

[29]  A. Whyte,et al.  Assessing community telecentres : guidelines for researchers , 2000 .

[30]  Bill Cooke,et al.  Institutions, agency and the limitations of participatory approaches to development. , 2001 .

[31]  D. Mosse,et al.  'People's knowledge', participation and patronage: operations and representations in rural development. , 2001 .

[32]  Bill Cooke,et al.  Pluralism, participation and power: joint forest management in India. , 2001 .

[33]  Mikael Berndtsson,et al.  References and Citations , 2002 .

[34]  Ian Pringle,et al.  Rural Community ICT Applications: The Kothmale Model , 2002 .

[35]  D. O’Connor,et al.  Providing Low-cost Information Technology Access to Rural Communities in Developing Countries: What Works? What Pays? , 2003 .

[36]  Michael Edwards,et al.  Toolkits : a practical guide to planning, monitoring, evaluation and impact assessment , 2003 .

[37]  E. A. Brett,et al.  Participation and accountability in development management , 2003 .

[38]  Shivraj Kanungo,et al.  On the emancipatory role of rural information systems , 2004, Inf. Technol. People.

[39]  D. Slater,et al.  Research: ICT Innovations for Poverty Reduction , 2004 .

[40]  Nimmi Rangaswamy.  Social Entrepreneurship as Critical Agency: A study of Rural Internet kiosks , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development.

[41]  Kentaro Toyama,et al.  Integrating Social Development and Financial Sustainability: The Challenges of Rural Computer Kiosks in Kerala , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development.