The influence of visual processing on phonetically driven saccades in the “visual world” paradigm

Publisher Summary This chapter presents analyses of a large set of eye–movement data that examine how factors associated with the processing of visual information affect eye movements to displayed pictures during the processing of the referent's name. Eye movements have increasingly become a measure of choice in the study of spoken language comprehension, providing fine-grained information about how the acoustic signal is mapped onto linguistic representations as speech unfolds. Research has established that eye movements are a powerful tool for investigating the processes by which speech is perceived and interpreted, especially the time course of these processes. It is found that phonetically driven fixations are affected by display preview, by the ongoing uptake of visual information, and by the position of pictures in the visual display. Importantly, lexical frequency associated with a picture's name affects the likelihood of refixating this picture and the timing of initiating a saccade away from this picture, thus supporting the use of eye movements as a measure of lexical processing. The chapter also describes how the display might influence lexical processing and help mitigate concerns about potential task-specific strategies. The results are encouraging for researchers who want to exploit the properties of the eye-tracking paradigm to explore issues of representation and process in spoken-word recognition.

[1]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[2]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Looking at the rope when looking for the snake: Conceptually mediated eye movements during spoken-word recognition , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[3]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access , 2002, Cognition.

[4]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis , 1979 .

[5]  D. Dahan,et al.  The temporal dynamics of ambiguity resolution: Evidence from spoken-word recognition. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.

[6]  Anne Pier Salverda,et al.  The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension , 2003, Cognition.

[7]  James S. Magnuson,et al.  The Dynamics of Lexical Competition During Spoken Word Recognition , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[8]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Subject Terms: Linguistics Language Eyes & eyesight Cognition & reasoning , 1995 .

[9]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Time Course of Frequency Effects in Spoken-Word Recognition: Evidence from Eye Movements , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  James S. Magnuson,et al.  The Microstructure of Spoken Word Recognition , 2001 .

[11]  C. Clifton,et al.  The On-line Study of Sentence Comprehension: Eyetracking, ERPs and Beyond , 2004 .

[12]  Roger M. Cooper,et al.  The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. , 1974 .

[13]  R. Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. , 1960 .

[14]  Fernanda Ferreira,et al.  Scene Perception for Psycholinguists. , 2004 .

[15]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  The time course of spoken word learning and recognition: studies with artificial lexicons. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[16]  Paul D. Allopenna,et al.  Tracking the Time Course of Spoken Word Recognition Using Eye Movements: Evidence for Continuous Mapping Models , 1998 .

[17]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  Why Look? Reasons for Eye Movements Related to Language Production. , 2004 .

[19]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Subcategorical mismatches and the time course of lexical access: Evidence for lexical competition , 2001 .