Development of Crash Reduction Factors: Methods, Problems, and Research Needs

Crash reduction factors (CRFs) are used in highway safety studies to predict safety benefits due to reduced numbers of crashes. NCHRP Report 162 identified the need for the development of a national comprehensive set of CRFs for each state to evaluate safety improvements. However, this need has not been met. As a result, many states have developed their own CRFs or have adopted CRFs from other states. A synthesis of the CRF development methods, the associated problems, and the research needs are provided. The emphasis is placed on the before-and-after study method because it has been, and still is, the method of choice for CRF development. Three before-and-after study methods were introduced and reviewed: (a) the simple before-and-after method, (b) the before-and-after study with comparison group method, and (c) the before-and-after study with the empirical Bayes method. The problems associated with the simple before-and-after studies, including regression to the mean, crash migration, maturation, and external causal factor, are discussed. Several research needs related to crash migration and general CRF development are also identified. The information presented in the synthesis will be useful to states that plan to develop or update their CRFs.

[1]  G A Davis,et al.  Accident reduction factors and causal inference in traffic safety studies: a review. , 2000, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  D F Jarrett,et al.  Estimating the regression-to-mean effect associated with road accident black spot treatment: towards a more realistic approach. , 1988, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  Ezra Hauer,et al.  Observational Before-After Studies in Road Safety , 1997 .

[4]  Leon S. Robertson,et al.  Motor vehicle death reductions from guardrail installation , 1998 .

[5]  Linda Mountain,et al.  THE ACCURACY OF ESTIMATES OF EXPECTED ACCIDENT FREQUENCIES OBTAINED USING AN EMPIRICAL BAYES APPROACH , 1991 .

[6]  Linda Mountain,et al.  The effects of engineering measures on safety at adjacent sites , 1992 .

[7]  Ezra Hauer,et al.  Estimating Safety by the Empirical Bayes Method: A Tutorial , 2002 .

[8]  L E Haefner,et al.  METHODS FOR EVALUATING HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS , 1975 .

[9]  Linda Mountain,et al.  THE AREA-WIDE EFFECTS OF ENGINEERING MEASURES ON ROAD ACCIDENT OCCURRENCE , 1989 .

[10]  Michael S. Griffith,et al.  Safety Evaluation of Rolled-In Continuous Shoulder Rumble Strips Installed on Freeways , 2000 .

[11]  R Elvik,et al.  Evaluations of road accident blackspot treatment: a case of the Iron Law of Evaluation Studies? , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  O J Pendleton.  A SYSTEMWIDE METHODOLOGY FOR EVALUATING HIGHWAY SAFETY STUDIES. FINAL REPORT , 1992 .

[13]  James G Strathman,et al.  Analysis of design attributes and crashes on the Oregon highway system. , 2001, Applied health economics and health policy.

[14]  Linda Mountain,et al.  THE ASSESSMENT OF CHANGES IN ACCIDENT FREQUENCIES ON LINK SEGMENTS: A COMPARISON OF FOUR METHODS , 1992 .

[15]  Hashem R Al-Masaeid.  Performance of safety evaluation methods , 1997 .

[16]  Rahim F Benekohal,et al.  PROCEDURES FOR ESTIMATING ACCIDENT REDUCTIONS ON TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS , 1992 .

[17]  E Hauer,et al.  Empirical Bayes approach to the estimation of "unsafety": the multivariate regression method. , 1992, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  M. J. Maher.  Accident migration: a statistical explanation? , 1987 .

[19]  Donald W. Reinfurt,et al.  ACCIDENT RESEARCH MANUAL , 1980 .

[20]  M J Maher,et al.  A bivariate negative binomial model to explain traffic accident migration. , 1990, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  C C Wright,et al.  ACCIDENT "MIGRATION" AFTER REMEDIAL TREATMENT AT ACCIDENT BLACKSPOTS , 1984 .

[22]  S D Lawson.  Automatic surveillance and red-light running. Potential for camera use and accident reduction at high-risk light-controlled junctions , 1992 .