Modeling Quality of Urban Life Using a Geospatial Approach

The rapid global urbanization of the past century poses several challenges for planners and policy makers. In particular, the conflation of social and urban issues must be understood to create sustainable and livable urban places. In this regard, it was our aim to model and understand the relationship between urban characteristics and peoples’ perceived quality of urban life (QoUL) using statistical analysis and geospatial modeling. We selected objective variables representing urban characteristics based on literature and used principal components analysis to develop uncorrelated components. These components served as the independent variables in a multiple linear regression analysis. The subjective, dependent variables were extracted from a QoUL survey. Results indicated that only the Education/Income component is related to QoUL (R2 of 0.46). Using only single independent variables in a linear model explained 46% of the total variance—over 10% higher than any previously determined relationship between objective variables and subjective QoUL. Furthermore, we found that subjective high QoUL and subjective low QoUL were not strongly correlated, indicating that they are affected by different objective variables, respectively. This suggests that future efforts of increasing QoUL need to define their goals more precisely, as measures for increasing perceptions of high QoUL are likely different from measures for decreasing perceptions of low QoUL.

[1]  David Manley,et al.  Scale, Aggregation, and the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem , 2013, Handbook of Regional Science.

[2]  Thomas Blaschke,et al.  Comparing Subjective and Objective Quality of Life Criteria: A Case Study of Green Space and Public Transport in Vienna, Austria , 2014, Social Indicators Research.

[3]  Adrienne Grêt-Regamey,et al.  Mediating Effects Between Objective and Subjective Indicators of Urban Quality of Life: Testing Specific Models for Safety and Access , 2015 .

[4]  Thomas Prinz,et al.  The Salzburg Quality of Urban Life Study with GIS Support , 2011 .

[5]  R. Stimson,et al.  An Overview of Quality of Urban Life , 2011 .

[6]  William A. V. Clark,et al.  The Effects of Data Aggregation in Statistical Analysis , 2010 .

[7]  M. G. Pittau,et al.  Economic Disparities and Life Satisfaction in European Regions , 2010 .

[8]  Stephen Wu,et al.  Objective Confirmation of Subjective Measures of Human Well-Being: Evidence from the U.S.A. , 2010, Science.

[9]  A. Oswald,et al.  Objective Confirmation of Subjective Measures of Human Well-Being: Evidence from the USA , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[10]  Pei-Shan Liao,et al.  Parallels Between Objective Indicators and Subjective Perceptions of Quality of Life: A Study of Metropolitan and County Areas in Taiwan , 2009 .

[11]  R. Widgery,et al.  Congruence among Objective and Subjective Quality-of-Life ( QOL ) Indicators , 2009 .

[12]  P. Rogerson,et al.  The Sage handbook of spatial analysis , 2009 .

[13]  Tenley M. Conway,et al.  Urban pattern and land cover variation in the greater Toronto area , 2007 .

[14]  R. McCrea,et al.  Urban Quality of Life: Linking Objective Dimensions and Subjective Evaluations of the Urban Environment , 2007 .

[15]  Tung-Kai Shyy,et al.  What is the Strength of the Link Between Objective and Subjective Indicators of Urban Quality of Life? , 2006 .

[16]  R. Stimson,et al.  Testing a Moderated Model of Satisfaction with Urban Living using Data for Brisbane-South East Queensland, Australia , 2005 .

[17]  Paige S. Warren,et al.  Neighborhood socioeconomic status is a useful predictor of perennial landscape vegetation in residential neighborhoods and embedded small parks of Phoenix, AZ , 2004 .

[18]  Robert W. Marans,et al.  Understanding environmental quality through quality of life studies: the 2001 DAS and its use of subjective and objective indicators☆ , 2003 .

[19]  C. Gries,et al.  Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  R. Stimson,et al.  Testing a general model of satisfaction with urban living using data for South East Queensland, Australia , 2003 .

[21]  C. Joppke RUSSELL SAGE FOUNDATION , 2003 .

[22]  Gündüz Atalik,et al.  Possibilities and Limitations for the Measurement of the Quality of Life in Urban Areas , 2001 .

[23]  Robert A. Cummins,et al.  Objective and Subjective Auality of Life: an Interactive Model , 2000 .

[24]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Well-being : the foundations of hedonic psychology , 1999 .

[25]  R. Marans,et al.  Objective and subjective indicators: Effects of scale discordance on interrelationships , 1980 .

[26]  S. Openshaw A million or so correlation coefficients : three experiments on the modifiable areal unit problem , 1979 .

[27]  P. Converse,et al.  The Quality of American Life: Perceptions, Evaluations, and Satisfactions , 1976 .

[28]  B. Mandelbrot How Long Is the Coast of Britain? Statistical Self-Similarity and Fractional Dimension , 1967, Science.

[29]  C. E. Gehlke,et al.  Certain Effects of Grouping upon the Size of the Correlation Coefficient in Census Tract Material , 1934 .