A framework for climate change engagement through video games

Abstract Video games have the potential to educate and engage people—especially young people—in climate change and energy issues by facilitating the development of helpful thoughts, feelings, and actions. The objective of the present article is to propose a set of game attributes that could maximise the cognitive, emotional, and behavioural engagement of players, and lay the foundations for future work. We have used semi-structured interviews with experts to identify a set of game attributes and a group discussion with teenagers to validate them. By applying grounded theory in our analysis of the experts’ responses, we have developed a framework for climate change engagement through serious games. It consists of 15 key attributes that we have classified in three dimensions: cognitive, emotional, and behavioural. Literature review drawn on sources in social psychology, communication and education has contributed to further explain and justify the inclusion of each of the attributes.

[1]  Shira Chess,et al.  Lessons down a rabbit hole: Alternate reality gaming in the classroom , 2014, New Media Soc..

[2]  Donna Pendergast Connecting with Millennials: Using Tag Clouds to Build a Folksonomy from Key Home Economics Documents , 2010 .

[3]  Steffen Schaal,et al.  Location-based smartphone games in the context of environmental education and education for sustainable development: fostering connectedness to nature with Geogames , 2018 .

[4]  D. Kahneman Thinking, Fast and Slow , 2011 .

[5]  Julie L Cidell,et al.  Content clouds as exploratory qualitative data analysis , 2010 .

[6]  Jie Chi Yang,et al.  Effects of locus of control on behavioral intention and learning performance of energy knowledge in game-based learning , 2017 .

[7]  Adriana de Souza e Silva,et al.  Hybrid Reality Games Reframed , 2006, Games Cult..

[8]  J. McGonigal Reality Is Broken: Why Games Make Us Better and How They Can Change the World , 2011 .

[9]  Michael F. Dahlstrom Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  C. Cooper Media Literacy as a Key Strategy Toward Improving Public Acceptance of Climate Change Science , 2011 .

[11]  Helena Bilandzic,et al.  Measuring Narrative Engagement , 2009 .

[12]  M. McCaffrey,et al.  Climate confusion among U.S. teachers , 2016, Science.

[13]  S. O'Neill,et al.  Public engagement with climate change: what do we know and where do we go from here? , 2013 .

[14]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience , 1990 .

[15]  S. Moser Communicating climate change: history, challenges, process and future directions , 2010 .

[16]  Andrew K. Przybylski,et al.  The Ideal Self at Play , 2012, Psychological science.

[17]  Bradley J. Morris,et al.  Gaming science: the “Gamification” of scientific thinking , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[18]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[19]  Paul Connolly ‘Dancing to the wrong tune': ethnography, generalisation and research on racism in schools , 1998 .

[20]  K. Charmaz,et al.  Constructing Grounded Theory , 2014 .

[21]  Anthony Leiserowitz,et al.  Improving Public Engagement With Climate Change , 2015, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[22]  Sophie A. Nicholson-Cole,et al.  “Fear Won't Do It” , 2009 .

[23]  Sophie A. Nicholson-Cole,et al.  Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications , 2007 .

[24]  June A. Flora,et al.  Energy behaviours of northern California Girl Scouts and their families , 2014 .

[25]  María-Dolores Olvera-Lobo,et al.  Analyzing Climate Change Communication Through Online Games , 2017 .

[26]  M. N. Peterson,et al.  How Climate Change Beliefs among U.S. Teachers Do and Do Not Translate to Students , 2016, PloS one.

[27]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[28]  A. Corner,et al.  How do young people engage with climate change? The role of knowledge, values, message framing, and trusted communicators , 2015 .

[29]  Charlotte Lærke Weitze Developing goals and objectives for gameplay and learning , 2014 .

[30]  Herre van Oostendorp,et al.  Measuring Effectiveness of Persuasive Games Using an Informative Control Condition , 2015, Int. J. Serious Games.

[31]  M. Prensky Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1 , 2001 .

[32]  James Paul Gee,et al.  What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy , 2007, CIE.

[33]  Jodi Asbell-Clarke,et al.  Challenging games help students learn: An empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game-based learning , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[34]  Joe E. Heimlich,et al.  Building face, construct, and content validity through use of a modified Delphi: adapting grounded theory to build an environmental field days observation tool , 2011 .

[35]  Jason S. Wu,et al.  Climate change games as tools for education and engagement , 2015 .

[36]  Nick Yee,et al.  Motivations for Play in Online Games , 2006, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[37]  Erik Knol,et al.  EnerCities - A Serious Game to Stimulate Sustainability and Energy Conservation: Preliminary Results , 2011 .

[38]  R. J. Repique Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants , 2013, Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association.

[39]  Sophie A. Nicholson-Cole Promoting Positive Engagement With Climate Change Through Visual and Iconic Representations , 2009 .

[40]  Nancy L. Leech,et al.  Sampling Designs in Qualitative Research: Making the Sampling Process More Public , 2007 .

[41]  G. Sinatra,et al.  Emotions about Teaching about Human-Induced Climate Change , 2013 .

[42]  Patricia Malone Switch: How to Change Things When Change Is Hard , 2011 .

[43]  N. Guéguen,et al.  Raising Students Awareness to Climate Change , 2017 .

[44]  Konstantin Mitgutsch,et al.  Purposeful by design?: a serious game design assessment framework , 2012, FDG.

[45]  Carmel McNaught,et al.  Using Wordle as a Supplementary Research Tool , 2010 .

[46]  Paul A. Cairns,et al.  A grounded investigation of game immersion , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[47]  June A. Flora,et al.  Effects of a behaviour change intervention for Girl Scouts on child and parent energy-saving behaviours , 2016, Nature Energy.

[48]  Adam Wierman,et al.  Thinking Fast and Slow , 2017, SIGMETRICS Perform. Evaluation Rev..

[49]  Henrik Schoenau-Fog,et al.  The Player Engagement Process - An Exploration of Continuation Desire in Digital Games , 2011, DiGRA Conference.

[50]  A. Leiserowitz,et al.  Evaluation of a national high school entertainment education program: The Alliance for Climate Education , 2014, Climatic Change.

[51]  Nancy A. Jennings,et al.  Communicating thin: A grounded model of Online Negative Enabling Support Groups in the pro-anorexia movement , 2011, New Media Soc..

[52]  L. Connelly Grounded theory. , 2013, Medsurg nursing : official journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses.