Exploration and Exploitation within Firms: The Impact of CEOs' Cognitive Style on Incremental and Radical Innovation Performance

Previous studies have provided valuable insights into how environmental and organizational factors may influence levels of explorative and exploitative innovation in firms. At the same time, scholars suggest that individual characteristics, such as cognitive and behavioural inclinations of top executives, might also have significant impact on the ability of a firm to engage in explorative and exploitative activities. The importance of the CEO is of interest, especially in medium-sized companies, where the CEO appears to be most influential. Very few studies, however, have quantitatively examined the relationship between individual characteristics of top managers and firm-level exploration and exploitation. Most of the existing research focuses on observable managerial characteristics and the composition of top management teams. Therefore, some important psychological issues may have been bypassed. This study complements prior research in two fundamental ways. First, whereas previous studies focus on extrinsic organizational factors that influence individual exploration and exploitation, we rely on insights from cognitive psychology to hypothesize a relationship between intrinsic factors (i.e., cognitive style) and individuals' tendency for exploration versus exploitation. Second, whereas existing research remains silent on the implications of individual CEO characteristics for firm performance, we hypothesize a relationship between CEOs' tendency for exploration or exploitation and firm-level innovation performance.

[1]  William M. Smith,et al.  A Study of Thinking , 1956 .

[2]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[3]  M. Hannan,et al.  The Population Ecology of Organizations , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[5]  Steven J. Armstrong,et al.  Individual Differences in Cognitive Style and their Effects on Task and Social Orientations of Self-Managed Work Teams , 2001 .

[6]  V. Vroom,et al.  Relationship between age and risk taking among managers. , 1971 .

[7]  M. Kirton,et al.  Adaptors and Innovators in Organizations , 1980 .

[8]  Bart Van Looy,et al.  Technology Alliance Portfolios and Financial Performance: Value-Enhancing and Cost-Increasing Effects of Open Innovation* , 2010 .

[9]  Christopher W. Allinson,et al.  The Cognitive Style Index: A Measure of Intuition‐Analysis For Organizational Research , 1996 .

[10]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[11]  S. Armstrong,et al.  Cognitive Style and Entrepreneurial Drive of New and Mature Business Owner-Managers , 2009 .

[12]  Raghu Garud,et al.  The innovation journey , 1999 .

[13]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[14]  Eva Cools,et al.  Role of Cognitive Styles in Business and Management: Reviewing 40 Years of Research , 2012 .

[15]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Structural Differentiation and Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Integration Mechanisms , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[16]  Christopher W. Allinson,et al.  Intuition and entrepreneurial behaviour , 2000 .

[17]  Dries Faems,et al.  The impact of continuous and discontinuous alliance strategies on startup innovation performance , 2010, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[18]  J. March.  Continuity and Change in Theories of Organizational Action , 1996 .

[19]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  The Influence of Demographic Heterogeneity on the Emergence and Consequences of Cooperative Norms in Work Teams , 2001 .

[20]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments. , 1984 .

[21]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation and Peformance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[22]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  The ambidextrous CEO. , 2011, Harvard business review.

[23]  Liisa-Maija Sainio,et al.  Constituents of radical innovation—exploring the role of strategic orientations and market uncertainty , 2012 .

[24]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability: Resolving the Innovator's Dilemma , 2007 .

[25]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[26]  Timothy N. Carroll,et al.  The Coevolution of New Organizational Forms , 1999 .

[27]  Gavin J. Wright.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1982 .

[28]  E. Sadler‐Smith.  Cognitive Style and the Management of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises , 2004 .

[29]  Louis A. Lefebvre,et al.  Firm innovativeness and CEO characteristics in small manufacturing firms , 1992 .

[30]  Alan S. Miller.  Cognitive Styles: an integrated model , 1987 .

[31]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge spillovers and the assignment of R&D responsibilities to foreign subsidiaries , 2004 .

[32]  John Hayes,et al.  Cognitive Style and its Relevance for Management Practice , 1994 .

[33]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators , 2008 .

[34]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Dual-process theories in social psychology , 1999 .

[35]  Sydney Finkelstein,et al.  Executive Job Demands: New Insights for Explaining Strategic Decisions and Leader Behaviors , 2005 .

[36]  Vincent L. Barker,et al.  CEO Characteristics and Firm R&D Spending , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[37]  Jesper B. Sørensen,et al.  Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation , 2000 .

[38]  M. Tushman,et al.  Executive Succession and Organization Outcomes in Turbulent Environments: An Organization Learning Approach , 1992 .

[39]  William M. Smith,et al.  A Study of Thinking , 1956 .

[40]  Lowell W. Busenitz,et al.  The Distinctive and Inclusive Domain of Entrepreneurial Cognition Research , 2004 .

[41]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Balancing Search and Stability: Interdependencies Among Elements of Organizational Design , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[42]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams , 2005 .

[43]  Anton J. Villado,et al.  Getting Specific about Demographic Diversity Variable and Team Performance Relationships: A Meta-Analysis , 2011 .

[44]  E. Sadler‐Smith,et al.  The Role of Intuition in Strategic Decision Making , 2009 .

[45]  M. Kirton.  Adaptors and Innovators: A Description and Measure. , 1976 .

[46]  M. Tushman,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation Within and Across Organizations , 2010 .

[47]  Sarah Kaplan.  Cognition, Capabilities, and Incentives: Assessing Firm Response to the Fiber-Optic Revolution , 2008 .

[48]  I. B. Myers.  The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Manual (1962). , 1962 .

[49]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[50]  D. Chambers,et al.  Strategic decision-making processes: the role of management and context , 1998 .

[51]  C. Freeman.  Economics of Industrial Innovation , 1975 .

[52]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers , 1984 .

[53]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Ambidexterity: The Impact of Environmental and Organizational Antecedents , 2005 .

[54]  J. Child.  Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice , 1972 .

[55]  Vassilis M. Papadakis,et al.  The chief executive officer as corporate champion of technological innovation: aii empirical investigation , 1998 .

[56]  Donald C. Hambrick,et al.  Managerial Discretion: A Bridge Between Polar Views of Organizations , 1987 .

[57]  Dries Faems,et al.  Unravelling the Hrm-Performance Link: Value-Creating and Cost-Increasing Effects of Small Business HRM , 2006 .

[58]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Understanding Variation in Managers' Ambidexterity: Investigating Direct and Interaction Effects of Formal Structural and Personal Coordination Mechanisms , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[59]  D. Dougherty.  Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms , 1992 .

[60]  Jitendra V. Singh.  Performance, Slack, and Risk Taking in Organizational Decision Making , 1986 .

[61]  J. Dutton,et al.  The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis , 1986 .

[62]  David Miller,et al.  Chief executive personality and corporate strategy and structure in small firms , 1986 .

[63]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Process Management and Technological Innovation: A Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint Industries , 2002 .

[64]  B. Looy,et al.  Interorganizational collaboration and innovation: Toward a portfolio approach , 2005 .

[65]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[66]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[67]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[68]  Ian D. Turner.  Rationality, Foolishness and Adaptive Intelligence , 2006 .

[69]  Bart Van Looy,et al.  Structural ambidexterity in NPD processes: A firm-level assessment of the impact of differentiated structures on innovation performance , 2010 .

[70]  David M. Schweiger,et al.  Measuring Managers' Minds: A Critical Reply to Robey and Taggart , 1983 .

[71]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  The interplay between exploration and exploitation. , 2006 .

[72]  G. Hodgkinson,et al.  Cognition in organizations. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[73]  E. Naveh,et al.  The Effect of Conformist and Attentive-To-Detail Members on Team Innovation: Reconciling the Innovation Paradox , 2011 .

[74]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Time: A New Research Lens , 2001 .

[75]  Corinne Post,et al.  Deep-Level Team Composition and Innovation , 2012 .