Selection of Appropriate Training Set of Chemicals for Modeling Dermal Permeability Using Uniform Coverage Design

In silico approaches to model dermal permeability require a training set of chemicals. Selection of an appropriate set of chemicals is the key factor in the precision of a model. The objective is to develop a training set of chemicals representing a wider chemical space relevant to biological activity such as dermal permeability and compare it with the currently used training set of chemicals by our laboratory, which was based on a subjective selection process. Wider chemical space refers to structurally diverse chemicals with a wide range of all the descriptor values. A parent dataset of 4098 chemicals with 5 solvatochromic descriptors obtained from ADME boxes database was used for this study. The approach for diverse chemical selection was performed using ‘uniform coverage design’ (UCD) run by SpaceFill program and compared with a cluster analysis using SAS. Five sets of 25 chemicals were obtained from the design and evaluated based on gas chromatographic assay amenability and representation of structurally diverse group. A final set of 25 chemicals to be used for modeling dermal permeability was selected, based on aforementioned criteria. Graphical plot of the principal components demonstrated that currently used training set of chemicals have narrow representation of parent dataset whereas the selected training set have appropriate representation in terms of chemical space. QSAR models were built from both training set of chemicals. The model based on the 25 selected chemicals (R2=0.83) performed equally if not slightly better then the model based on currently used training set of 32 chemicals (R2=0.82).

[1]  R. B. Robinson,et al.  Identifying outliers in correlated water quality data , 2005 .

[2]  M. Abraham,et al.  Recommendations for the determination of selectivity in micellar electrokinetic chromatography , 1998 .

[3]  M T D Cronin,et al.  Quantitative structure-permeability relationships (QSPRs) for percutaneous absorption. , 2002, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[4]  M. Abraham,et al.  Calculations on ionic solvation. Part 1.—Free energies of solvation of gaseous univalent ions using a one-layer continuum model , 1978 .

[5]  William J. Welch,et al.  Uniform Coverage Designs for Molecule Selection , 2002, Technometrics.

[6]  J. Riviere,et al.  Determination of the effective dermal penetration barrier pH of porcine skin. , 2009, Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics.

[7]  A. Hopkins,et al.  Navigating chemical space for biology and medicine , 2004, Nature.

[8]  Michael H. Abraham,et al.  Hydrogen bonding part 46: a review of the correlation and prediction of transport properties by an lfer method: physicochemical properties, brain penetration and skin permeability , 1999 .

[9]  Russell O. Potts,et al.  A Predictive Algorithm for Skin Permeability: The Effects of Molecular Size and Hydrogen Bond Activity , 1995, Pharmaceutical Research.

[10]  Russell O. Potts,et al.  Predicting Skin Permeability , 1992, Pharmaceutical Research.

[11]  John D. Walker,et al.  Quantitative structure‐activity relationships for predicting percutaneous absorption rates , 2003, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[12]  Peter W Carr,et al.  The chemical interpretation and practice of linear solvation energy relationships in chromatography. , 2006, Journal of chromatography. A.

[13]  H. Lambers,et al.  Natural skin surface pH is on average below 5, which is beneficial for its resident flora , 2006, International journal of cosmetic science.

[14]  D Fitzpatrick,et al.  Modelling skin permeability in risk assessment--the future. , 2004, Chemosphere.

[15]  M. Abraham,et al.  Solute-solvent interactions in micellar electrokinetic chromatography. III. Characterization of the selectivity of micellar electrokinetic chromatography systems. , 2002, Journal of chromatography. A.

[16]  M. Roberts,et al.  Permeability of human epidermis to phenolic compounds , 1977, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[17]  Mark T D Cronin,et al.  Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) for the prediction of skin permeation of exogenous chemicals. , 2002, Chemosphere.

[18]  H. Korting,et al.  The pH of the Skin Surface and Its Impact on the Barrier Function , 2006, Skin Pharmacology and Physiology.

[19]  Michael S. Roberts,et al.  Epidermal permeability — Penetrant structure relationships: 3. The effect of hydrogen bonding interactions and molecular size on diffusion across the stratum corneum , 1996 .

[20]  M. Khaledi,et al.  Characterization of chemical selectivity in micellar electrokinetic chromatography. 4. Effect of surfactant headgroup. , 1999, Analytical chemistry.

[21]  N. Redman-Furey,et al.  Statistical cluster analysis of pharmaceutical solvents. , 2007, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[22]  C. Dobson Chemical space and biology , 2004, Nature.