Innovation or imitation

Traditionally, benchmarking has been described as a practice that promotes imitation. However, according to a more recent approach, this paper suggests that benchmarking, looking outside the firm boundaries and enabling comparison with others, in terms of both practices and performances, enable the process of acquiring external explicit and tacit knowledge. Such newly acquired knowledge, once integrated with previous internal knowledge of the firm, creates new knowledge that may give rise to improvements and innovations. In order to study the innovative power of benchmarking, this paper presents a three‐year research undertaken in the maintenance‐services sector that is becoming more and more global and competitive. A model that integrates benchmarking, knowledge management and innovation is presented as the main result of the research.

[1]  Poul Houman Andersen,et al.  Organizing international technological collaboration in subcontractor relationships: an investigation of the knowledge-stickiness problem , 1999 .

[2]  K. R. Conner.  A Historical Comparison of Resource-Based Theory and Five Schools of Thought Within Industrial Organization Economics: Do We Have a New Theory of the Firm? , 1991 .

[3]  P. Bierly,et al.  Analyzing innovation adoption using a knowledge-based approach , 2001 .

[4]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[5]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  The Structure of Ill-Structured Solutions: Boundary Objects and Heterogeneous Distributed Problem Solving , 1989, Distributed Artificial Intelligence.

[6]  Raphael Kaplinsky,et al.  Developing capability through learning networks , 2003 .

[7]  Melanie Older Gray,et al.  The use and effectiveness of benchmarking in SMEs , 2001 .

[8]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[9]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Enabling Knowledge Creation: How to Unlock the Mystery of Tacit Knowledge and Release the Power of Innovation , 2000 .

[10]  H. Gemünden,et al.  The impact of a company's business strategy on its technological competence, network competence and innovation success , 2004 .

[11]  W.M.J. Geraerds.  The EUT maintenance model , 1992 .

[12]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The core competence of the corporation’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. pp. . , 1990 .

[13]  K. Pavitt.  What We Know about the Strategic Management of Technology , 1990 .

[14]  E. Penrose.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[15]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[16]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[17]  Kaj U. Koskinen,et al.  The role of tacit knowledge in innovation processes of small technology companies , 2002 .

[18]  Stephen A.W. Drew,et al.  From knowledge to action: the impact of benchmarking on organizational performance , 1997 .

[19]  J. Spender.  Organizational knowledge, learning and memory: three concepts in search of a theory , 1996 .

[20]  V. Albino,et al.  A metric for measuring Knowledge Codification in Organisation Learning , 2001 .

[21]  Yannis Caloghirou,et al.  Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: complements or substitutes for innovative performance? , 2004 .

[22]  Danny Samson,et al.  BENCHMARKING AS A MIXED METAPHOR: DISENTANGLING ASSUMPTIONS OF COMPETITION AND COLLABORATION* , 1997 .

[23]  Pierpaolo Andriani,et al.  Managing Knowledge for Innovation , 2002 .

[24]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[25]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[26]  F. Nicolò,et al.  Integration of benchmarking and benchmarking of integration , 1995 .

[27]  Robert C. Camp,et al.  Benchmarking: The Search for Industry Best Practices That Lead to Superior Performance , 1989 .

[28]  Kate Blackmon,et al.  Small firms under MICROSCOPE: international differences in production/operations management practices and performance , 2001 .

[29]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..