Generalized functional responses for species distributions.

Researchers employing resource selection functions (RSFs) and other related methods aim to detect correlates of space-use and mitigate against detrimental environmental change. However, an empirical model fit to data from one place or time is unlikely to capture species responses under different conditions because organisms respond nonlinearly to changes in habitat availability. This phenomenon, known as a functional response in resource selection, has been debated extensively in the RSF literature but continues to be ignored by practitioners for lack of a practical treatment. We therefore extend the RSF approach to enable it to estimate generalized functional responses (GFRs) from spatial data. GFRs employ data from several sampling instances characterized by diverse profiles of habitat availability. By modeling the regression coefficients of the underlying RSF as functions of availability, GFRs can account for environmental change and thus predict population distributions in new environments. We formulate the approach as a mixed-effects model so that it is estimable by readily available statistical software. We illustrate its application using (1) simulation and (2) wolf home-range telemetry. Our results indicate that GFRs can offer considerable improvements in estimation speed and predictive ability over existing mixed-effects approaches.

[1]  Andrew E. Derocher,et al.  Functional responses in polar bear habitat selection , 2003 .

[2]  B. Manly,et al.  Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. , 1994 .

[3]  Jason Matthiopoulos,et al.  The interpretation of habitat preference metrics under use–availability designs , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  Chris J. Johnson,et al.  Resource Selection Functions Based on Use–Availability Data: Theoretical Motivation and Evaluation Methods , 2006 .

[5]  Jason Matthiopoulos,et al.  The use of space by animals as a function of accessibility and preference , 2003 .

[6]  Daniel Fortin,et al.  Mixed conditional logistic regression for habitat selection studies. , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.

[7]  Manly,et al.  Reply from M.S. Boyce, L.L. McDonald and B.F.J. Manly. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[8]  Douglas H. Johnson.  THE COMPARISON OF USAGE AND AVAILABILITY MEASUREMENTS FOR EVALUATING RESOURCE PREFERENCE , 1980 .

[9]  T. Osko,et al.  MOOSE HABITAT PREFERENCES IN RESPONSE TO CHANGING AVAILABILITY , 2004 .

[10]  David J. Mladenoff,et al.  Predicting gray wolf landscape recolonization: logistic regression models vs. new field data , 1999 .

[11]  Michael L. Morrison,et al.  The habitat concept and a plea for standard terminology , 1997 .

[12]  Bryan F. J. Manly,et al.  Assessing habitat selection when availability changes , 1996 .

[13]  Atle Mysterud,et al.  FUNCTIONAL RESPONSES IN HABITAT USE: AVAILABILITY INFLUENCES RELATIVE USE IN TRADE-OFF SITUATIONS , 1998 .

[14]  G. E. Hutchinson,et al.  Homage to Santa Rosalia or Why Are There So Many Kinds of Animals? , 1959, The American Naturalist.

[15]  A. Hirzel,et al.  Habitat suitability modelling and niche theory , 2008 .

[16]  Cameron L. Aldridge,et al.  Application of random effects to the study of resource selection by animals. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[17]  Mark Hebblewhite,et al.  Modelling wildlife–human relationships for social species with mixed‐effects resource selection models , 2007 .

[18]  W. Thuiller,et al.  Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[19]  S. Cherry,et al.  USE AND INTERPRETATION OF LOGISTIC REGRESSION IN HABITAT-SELECTION STUDIES , 2004 .

[20]  Elizabeth E Crone,et al.  Causes and consequences of variation in plant population growth rate: a synthesis of matrix population models in a phylogenetic context. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[21]  Bernie J. McConnell,et al.  Estimating space‐use and habitat preference from wildlife telemetry data , 2008 .

[22]  M. Boyce,et al.  Relating populations to habitats using resource selection functions. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[23]  M. Angilletta,et al.  Can mechanism inform species' distribution models? , 2010, Ecology letters.

[24]  A. Mysterud,et al.  Relating populations to habitats. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  Atle Mysterud,et al.  Temporal scales, trade-offs, and functional responses in red deer habitat selection. , 2009, Ecology.

[26]  J. Elith,et al.  Species Distribution Models: Ecological Explanation and Prediction Across Space and Time , 2009 .