Scaling effects in crossmodal improvement of visual perception by motor system stimulus

Abstract This work underlines the substantial similarity between deficitary and normal brain neural network, which appear to be related by a change of scale of their cerebral excitabilities. Extending the previous works on multisensory effects and crossmodal facilitation in subjects with cortical lesions, we observe similar phenomena, but much weaker, in normal subjects. Specifically, visual acuity is observed to slightly improve in 10 normal subjects under moderate, static muscular effort, and a scaling power law is found to characterize the improvement with the intensity of the effort. This fact supports the generality of the idea of distributed functionality of motor cortex and sensory systems through the whole cortex. The mechanism of activation of unspecific (or multispecific) neural mass that explains facilitation phenomena in damaged brain appears here to be similar in normal brain. The scaling power law for the improvement of perception with intensity of facilitating stimulus would reflect basic biological scaling power laws with the activated mass of the neural network.

[1]  Isabel Gonzalo-Fonrodona,et al.  Physiological Laws of Sensory Visual System in Relation to Scaling Power Laws in Biological Neural Networks , 2007, IWINAC.

[2]  Michael Bach,et al.  The Freiburg Visual Acuity Test-Variability unchanged by post-hoc re-analysis , 2007, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[3]  Roberto Moreno-Díaz,et al.  The fuzzy paradigm for knowledge representation in cerebral dynamics , 1987 .

[4]  Amir Amedi,et al.  Disentangling unisensory and multisensory components in audiovisual integration using a novel multifrequency fMRI spectral analysis , 2010, NeuroImage.

[5]  M. Bach,et al.  The Freiburg Visual Acuity test--automatic measurement of visual acuity. , 1996, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[6]  T. Stanford,et al.  Challenges in quantifying multisensory integration: alternative criteria, models, and inverse effectiveness , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  Isabel Gonzalo-Fonrodona,et al.  Scaling Power Laws in the Restoration of Perception with Increasing Stimulus in Deficitary Natural Neural Network , 2009, IWINAC.

[8]  Isabel Gonzalo-Fonrodona,et al.  Functional gradients through the cortex, multisensory integration and scaling laws in brain dynamics , 2008, Neurocomputing.

[9]  Ana E. Delgado García.  Modelos neurocibernéticos de dinámica cerebral , 1978 .

[10]  A. Amedi,et al.  Functional imaging of human crossmodal identification and object recognition , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  G. Hartmann.  II. Changes in visual acuity through simultaneous stimulation of other sense organs. , 1933 .

[12]  G. Westheimer.  Do ocular-dominance columns set spatial limits for hyperacuity processing? , 1982, Vision Research.

[13]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  The metamodal organization of the brain. , 2001, Progress in brain research.

[14]  Richard B. Anderson.  The power law as an emergent property , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[15]  L. Shams,et al.  Crossmodal influences on visual perception. , 2010, Physics of life reviews.

[16]  I. Steiner,et al.  Reversal of vision metamorphopsia: clinical and anatomical characteristics. , 1998, Archives of neurology.

[17]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Dopaminergic effects on electrophysiological and functional MRI measures of human cortical stimulus–response power laws , 2004, NeuroImage.

[18]  Amir Amedi,et al.  Multisensory visual–tactile object related network in humans: insights gained using a novel crossmodal adaptation approach , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  James H. Brown,et al.  The origin of allometric scaling laws in biology from genomes to ecosystems: towards a quantitative unifying theory of biological structure and organization , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[21]  L. Merabet,et al.  The plastic human brain cortex. , 2005, Annual review of neuroscience.

[22]  M. Wallace,et al.  A revised view of sensory cortical parcellation , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  José R. Álvarez,et al.  Cooperative Organization of Connectivity Patterns and Receptive Fields in the Visual Pathway: Application to Adaptive Thresholding , 1995, IWANN.

[24]  W. Köhler.  Gestalt psychology , 1967 .

[25]  M. C. Lorenzi,et al.  The Influence of Voluntary Muscle Contractions upon the Onset and Modulation of Tinnitus , 2002, Audiology and Neurotology.

[26]  Micah M. Murray,et al.  The Neural Bases of Multisensory Processes , 2011 .

[27]  Edward Lobarinas,et al.  Head, Neck, and Eye Movements That Modulate Tinnitus. , 2008, Seminars in hearing.

[28]  K. Goldstein,et al.  Psychologische Analysen hirnpathologischer Fälle , 1925 .

[29]  I. D. London,et al.  Research on sensory interaction in the Soviet Union. , 1954, Psychological bulletin.