Jitter Model and Signal Processing Techniques for High-Density Optical Data Storage

The author discusses a jitter model and signal processing techniques for data recovery in pulse width modulation (PWM) optical recording. A high-speed counter clock is used to convert time marks to amplitude marks, and signal processing techniques are used to minimize jitter according to the jitter model. The jitter model considered takes into account jitter from both the write and read processes, and the signal processing techniques include: velocity and intersymbol interference equalization; differential interleaving detection (DID); additive interleaving detection (AID); differential interleaving modulation (DIM); and additive interleaving modulation (AIM). These techniques are found to be effective in reducing the mark error rate (MER). Various modulation codes can be used in addition to the signal processing techniques to achieve better modulation efficiency. >

[1]  John M. Cioffi,et al.  Channel equalization methods for magnetic storage , 1989, IEEE International Conference on Communications, World Prosperity Through Communications,.

[2]  Masud Mansuripur.  Detecting transition regions in magneto‐optical disk systems , 1989 .

[3]  H. Thapar,et al.  A class of partial response systems for increasing storage density in magnetic recording , 1987 .

[4]  R. Wood.  Magnetic and optical storage systems: opportunities for communications technology , 1989, IEEE International Conference on Communications, World Prosperity Through Communications,.

[5]  Paul H. Siegel,et al.  Even mark modulation for optical recording , 1989, IEEE International Conference on Communications, World Prosperity Through Communications,.

[6]  Kees A. Schouhamer Immink.  Coding techniques for the noisy magnetic recording channel: a state-of-the-art report , 1989, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[7]  A. Marchant.  Optical Recording: A Technical Overview , 1990 .

[8]  Jack K. Wolf,et al.  Trellis Coding for Partial-Response Channels , 1986, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[9]  P. Sutardja.  A post-compensation scheme for peak-detect channel , 1990, International Conference on Magnetics.

[10]  B. P. Lathi,et al.  Modern Digital and Analog Communication Systems , 1983 .

[11]  G. David Forney,et al.  Maximum-likelihood sequence estimation of digital sequences in the presence of intersymbol interference , 1972, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[12]  John M. Cioffi,et al.  On the combination of equalization and coding in saturation recording , 1989, IEEE International Conference on Communications, World Prosperity Through Communications,.

[13]  Dennis G. Howe.  Signal-To-Noise Ratio (SNR) For Reliable Data Recording , 1987, Optics & Photonics.

[14]  Roger W. Wood,et al.  Viterbi Detection of Class IV Partial Response on a Magnetic Recording Channel , 1986, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[15]  M. Freiser,et al.  A survey of magnetooptic effects , 1968 .

[16]  Arvind M. Patel.  Signal and error-control coding , 1989 .

[17]  Don Coppersmith,et al.  Algorithms for sliding block codes - An application of symbolic dynamics to information theory , 1983, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[18]  T. W. McDaniel.  Simulation of bit jitter in magneto‐optic recording , 1988 .

[19]  Richard Crane Schneider.  Write equalization in high-linear-density magnetic recording , 1985 .

[20]  Paul H. Siegel,et al.  Recording codes for digital magnetic storage , 1985 .

[21]  Hisashi Kobayashi,et al.  Application of partial-response channel coding to magnetic recording systems , 1970 .