Taking Algorithms to Courts: A Relational Approach to Algorithmic Accountability
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Jacob Metcalf,et al. Obligations to assess: Recent trends in AI accountability regulations , 2022, Patterns.
[2] M. Cannarsa. Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI , 2021, The Cambridge Handbook of Lawyering in the Digital Age.
[3] Madeleine Clare Elish,et al. Governing Algorithmic Systems with Impact Assessments: Six Observations , 2021, AIES.
[4] Karin van Es,et al. Gendered language and employment Web sites: How search algorithms can cause allocative harm , 2021, First Monday.
[5] Malte Ziewitz,et al. Critical companionship: Some sensibilities for studying the lived experience of data subjects , 2021, Big Data Soc..
[6] Shira Mitchell,et al. Algorithmic Fairness: Choices, Assumptions, and Definitions , 2021, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application.
[7] Abeba Birhane,et al. Algorithmic injustice: a relational ethics approach , 2021, Patterns.
[8] Severin Kacianka,et al. Designing Accountable Systems , 2021, FAccT.
[9] M. C. Elish,et al. Algorithmic Impact Assessments and Accountability: The Co-construction of Impacts , 2020, FAccT.
[10] Mohamed Abdalla,et al. The Grey Hoodie Project: Big Tobacco, Big Tech, and the Threat on Academic Integrity , 2020, AIES.
[11] Timnit Gebru,et al. Datasheets for datasets , 2018, Commun. ACM.
[12] M. C. Elish,et al. Assembling Accountability: Algorithmic Impact Assessment for the Public Interest , 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal.
[13] Joshua A. Kroll. Accountability in Computer Systems , 2020 .
[14] Solon Barocas,et al. Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of “Bias” in NLP , 2020, ACL.
[15] Peter Henderson,et al. Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claims , 2020, ArXiv.
[16] Maranke Wieringa,et al. What to account for when accounting for algorithms: a systematic literature review on algorithmic accountability , 2020, FAT*.
[17] Erez Shmueli,et al. Algorithmic Fairness , 2020, ArXiv.
[18] Inioluwa Deborah Raji,et al. Closing the AI accountability gap: defining an end-to-end framework for internal algorithmic auditing , 2020, FAT*.
[19] Bullard,et al. Anatomy of Environmental Racism and the Environmental Justice Movement , 2020 .
[20] Francesca Palmiotto,et al. The Black Box on Trial: The Impact of Algorithmic Opacity on Fair Trial Rights in Criminal Proceedings , 2020 .
[21] Serena Quattrocolo,et al. Artificial Intelligence, Computational Modelling and Criminal Proceedings , 2020 .
[22] Jon Romberg. Trust the Process: Understanding Procedural Standing Under Spokeo , 2020 .
[23] Frank A. Pasquale,et al. Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Bias In Finance: Toward Responsible Innovation , 2019 .
[24] Luciano Floridi,et al. Establishing the rules for building trustworthy AI , 2019, Nature Machine Intelligence.
[25] Inioluwa Deborah Raji,et al. Actionable Auditing: Investigating the Impact of Publicly Naming Biased Performance Results of Commercial AI Products , 2019, AIES.
[26] Inioluwa Deborah Raji,et al. Model Cards for Model Reporting , 2018, FAT.
[27] W. B. Gallie. Essentially Contested Concepts , 1994, The Importance of Language.
[28] William E. Thro,et al. Administrative Procedure Act , 2018 .
[29] Matthias Gross,et al. Routledge International Handbook of Ignorance Studies , 2018 .
[30] Mike Ananny,et al. Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability , 2018, New Media Soc..
[31] Timnit Gebru,et al. Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification , 2018, FAT.
[32] Julia Powles,et al. "Meaningful Information" and the Right to Explanation , 2017, FAT.
[33] Jack M. Balkin,et al. The Three Laws of Robotics in the Age of Big Data , 2017 .
[34] A. Waldman. Designing Without Privacy , 2017 .
[35] Rebecca Wexler. Life, Liberty, and Trade Secrets: Intellectual Property in the Criminal Justice System , 2017 .
[36] Avi Feller,et al. Algorithmic Decision Making and the Cost of Fairness , 2017, KDD.
[37] James Grimmelmann,et al. Incomprehensible Discrimination , 2017 .
[38] Daniel J. Solove,et al. Risk and Anxiety: A Theory of Data Breach Harms , 2016 .
[39] M. Lodge,et al. The Reputational Basis of Public Accountability , 2016 .
[40] A. Tutt. An FDA for Algorithms , 2016 .
[41] Jenna Burrell,et al. How the machine ‘thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms , 2016 .
[42] K. Levy,et al. When open data is a Trojan Horse: The weaponization of transparency in science and governance , 2016 .
[43] J. Reidenberg,et al. Accountable Algorithms , 2016 .
[44] N. Diakopoulos. Accountability in algorithmic decision making , 2016, ACM Queue.
[45] K. Elliott. Selective ignorance in environmental research , 2015 .
[46] Frank A. Pasquale. The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information , 2015 .
[47] A. Zwitter. Big Data ethics , 2014, Big Data Soc..
[48] J. Stilgoe,et al. Developing a framework for responsible innovation* , 2013, The Ethics of Nanotechnology, Geoengineering and Clean Energy.
[49] Anupam Chander,et al. How Law Made Silicon Valley , 2013 .
[50] Miles Brundage,et al. Artificial Intelligence and Responsible Innovation , 2013, PT-AI.
[51] Deirdre K. Mulligan,et al. PIA Requirements and Privacy Decision-Making in US Government Agencies , 2012 .
[52] Ethan Bernstein,et al. The Transparency Paradox , 2012 .
[53] L. Edelman,et al. To Comply or Not to Comply - That Isn't the Question: How Organizations Construct the Meaning of Compliance , 2011 .
[54] Sandra F. Sperino. Rethinking Discrimination Law , 2011 .
[55] J. Waldron,et al. The Rule of Law and the Importance of Procedure , 2010 .
[56] M. Bovens. Two Concepts of Accountability: Accountability as a Virtue and as a Mechanism , 2010 .
[57] Law.. Civil Rights Act of 1964 , 2010 .
[58] Londa Schiebinger,et al. Agnotology : the making and unmaking of ignorance , 2008 .
[59] M. Bovens. Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework , 2007 .
[60] Uma Outka. Nepa and Environmental Justice: Integration, Implementation, and Judicial Review , 2006 .
[61] G. Edmond,et al. Daubert and the Exclusionary Ethos: The Convergence of Corporate and Judicial Attitudes Towards the Admissibility of Expert Evidence in Tort Litigation , 2004 .
[62] H. Nissenbaum. Privacy as contextual integrity , 2004 .
[63] Elaine W. Shoben. Disparate Impact Theory in Employment Discrimination: What’s Griggs Still Good For? What Not? , 2004 .
[64] Stephen R. Perry. Harm, History, and Counterfactuals , 2003 .
[65] D. Gaonkar. Publics and counterpublics , 2002 .
[66] S. Jasanoff. Science and statistical victim: modernizing knowledge in breast implant litigation. , 2002, Social studies of science.
[67] Marilyn Strathern,et al. Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy , 2000 .
[68] Ralph Heintzman,et al. The Dialectics of Accountability for Performance in Public Management Reform , 2000 .
[69] R. Bullard. Dismantling Environmental Racism in the USA , 1999 .
[70] Ilyssa Birnbach. Newly Imposed Limitations on Citizens' Right to Sue for Standing in a Procedural Rights Case , 1998 .
[71] Heather Devine. Science at the Bar: Law, Science and Technology in America , 1997 .
[72] H. Nissenbaum. Accountability in a computerized society , 1997 .
[73] A. Godfrey,et al. Accountability and decision-making in feudal England: Domesday Book revisited , 1996 .
[74] R. Duff. Harm to Others , 1986 .
[75] David P. McCaffrey,et al. Making Bureaucracies Think: The Environmental Impact Statement Strategy of Administrative Reform. , 1986 .
[76] J. Dewey,et al. The Public and its Problems , 1927 .