Simulation-Optimization Framework for Synthesis and Design of Natural Gas Downstream Utilization Networks

Many potential diversification and conversion options are available for utilization of natural gas resources, and several design configurations and technology choices exist for conversion of natural gas to value-added products. Therefore, a detailed mathematical model is desirable for selection of optimal configuration and operating mode among the various options available. In this study, we present a simulation-optimization framework for the optimal selection of economic and environmentally sustainable pathways for natural gas downstream utilization networks by optimizing process design and operational decisions. The main processes (e.g., LNG, GTL, and methanol production), along with different design alternatives in terms of flow-sheeting for each main processing unit (namely syngas preparation, liquefaction, N2 rejection, hydrogen, FT synthesis, methanol synthesis, FT upgrade, and methanol upgrade units), are used for superstructure development. These processes are simulated using ASPEN Plus V7.3 to determine the yields of different processing units under various operating modes. The model has been applied to maximize total profit of the natural gas utilization system with penalties for environmental impact, represented by CO2eq emission obtained using ASPEN Plus for each flowsheet configuration and operating mode options. The performance of the proposed modeling framework is demonstrated using a case study.

[1]  Saeid Mokhatab,et al.  Onshore LNG Production Process Selection , 2006 .

[2]  A. Steynberg,et al.  Fischer-Tropsch technology , 2004 .

[3]  Jens R. Rostrup-Nielsen,et al.  Syngas in perspective , 2002 .

[4]  B. Jager,et al.  Advances in low temperature Fischer-Tropsch synthesis , 1995 .

[5]  Jens R. Rostrup-Nielsen,et al.  Technologies for large-scale gas conversion , 2001 .

[6]  Ali Elkamel,et al.  Simulation and optimization of natural gas processing and production network consisting of LNG, GTL, and methanol facilities , 2015 .

[7]  J. Rostrup-Nielsen.  New aspects of syngas production and use , 2000 .

[8]  Per K. Bakkerud.  Update on synthesis gas production for GTL , 2005 .

[9]  M. Dry,et al.  The Fischer–Tropsch process: 1950–2000 , 2002 .

[10]  Magali Boutonnet,et al.  Gas to liquids: A technology for natural gas industrialization in Bolivia , 2010 .

[11]  M. El‐Halwagi,et al.  Optimization and Selection of Reforming Approaches for Syngas Generation from Natural/Shale Gas , 2014 .

[12]  José Luz Silveira,et al.  Sustainable Hydrogen Production Processes , 2017 .

[13]  D. J. Wilhelm,et al.  Syngas production for gas-to-liquids applications: technologies, issues and outlook , 2001 .

[14]  F. Mueller-Langer,et al.  Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen production processes for the hydrogen economy for the short and medium term , 2007 .

[15]  Jens R. Rostrup-Nielsen,et al.  Concepts in Syngas Manufacture , 2011 .

[16]  George A. Olah,et al.  Beyond Oil and Gas: The Methanol Economy , 2005 .

[17]  Andrea P. Ortiz-Espinoza,et al.  Techno-Economic Assessment and Environmental Impact of Shale Gas Alternatives to Methanol , 2014 .

[18]  José Luz Silveira,et al.  Hydrogen Production Processes , 2017 .

[19]  Arno de Klerk,et al.  Fischer-Tropsch Refining , 2011 .

[20]  Ali Elkamel,et al.  Integrating Simulation in Optimal Synthesis and Design of Natural Gas Upstream Processing Networks , 2017 .

[21]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  The economic viability of gas-to-liquids technology and the crude oil–natural gas price relationship , 2017 .

[22]  Andre Peter Steynberg,et al.  High temperature Fischer–Tropsch synthesis in commercial practice , 1999 .

[23]  Richard A. Dawe,et al.  Review of ways to transport natural gas energy from countries which do not need the gas for domestic use , 2003 .

[24]  Chikezie Nwaoha,et al.  Gas-to-liquids (GTL): A review of an industry offering several routes for monetizing natural gas , 2012 .

[25]  A. Kidnay,et al.  Fundamentals of Natural Gas Processing , 2006 .

[26]  W. Luyben.  Design and Control of the Dry Methane Reforming Process , 2014 .

[27]  J. C. Kuo,et al.  Pros and cons of different Nitrogen Removal Unit (NRU) technology , 2012 .

[28]  B. Jager,et al.  Low temperature Fischer–Tropsch synthesis from a Sasol perspective , 1999 .

[29]  Thomas Sandahl Christensen,et al.  Recent developments in autothermal reforming and pre-reforming for synthesis gas production in GTL applications , 2003 .