Optical See-Through Head Mounted Display Direct Linear Transformation Calibration Robustness in the Presence of User Alignment Noise

The correct spatial registration between virtual and real objects in optical see-through augmented reality implies accurate estimates of the user's eyepoint relative to the location and orientation of the display surface. A common approach is to estimate the display parameters through a calibration procedure involving a subjective alignment exercise. Human postural sway and targeting precision contribute to imprecise alignments, which in turn adversely affect the display parameter estimation resulting in registration errors between virtual and real objects. The technique commonly used has its origin in computer vision, and calibrates stationary cameras using hundreds of correspondence points collected instantaneously in one video frame where precision is limited only by pixel quantization and image blur. Subsequently the input noise level is several order of magnitudes greater when a human operator manually collects correspondence points one by one. This paper investigates the effect of human alignment noise on view parameter estimation in an optical see-through head mounted display to determine how well a standard camera calibration method performs at greater noise levels than documented in computer vision literature. Through Monte-Carlo simulations we show that it is particularly difficult to estimate the user's eyepoint in depth, but that a greater distribution of correspondence points in depth help mitigate the effects of human alignment noise.

[1]  Andrew W. Fitzgibbon,et al.  Spatial calibration of an optical see-through head-mounted display , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[2]  Ji Zhou,et al.  Evaluation of calibration procedures for optical see-through head-mounted displays , 2003, The Second IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, 2003. Proceedings..

[3]  Mihran Tuceryan,et al.  A method for calibrating see-through head-mounted displays for AR , 1999, Proceedings 2nd IEEE and ACM International Workshop on Augmented Reality (IWAR'99).

[4]  Fan Xiao,et al.  Display-relative calibration for optical see-through head-mounted displays , 2004, Third IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[5]  Paul R. Cohen,et al.  Camera Calibration with Distortion Models and Accuracy Evaluation , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[6]  Ronald R. Mourant,et al.  Human Factors Issues in Virtual Environments: A Review of the Literature , 1998, Presence.

[7]  Sundaram Ganapathy,et al.  Decomposition of transformation matrices for robot vision , 1984, Pattern Recognition Letters.

[8]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Single point active alignment method (SPAAM) for optical see-through HMD calibration for AR , 2000, Proceedings IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Augmented Reality (ISAR 2000).

[9]  H. M. Karara,et al.  Direct Linear Transformation from Comparator Coordinates into Object Space Coordinates in Close-Range Photogrammetry , 2015 .

[10]  David E. Breen,et al.  Calibration Requirements and Procedures for a Monitor-Based Augmented Reality System , 1995, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[11]  R M Nicholson,et al.  The Feasibility of a Helmet-Mounted Sight as a Control Device , 1966, Human factors.

[12]  Nassir Navab,et al.  A new system for online quantitative evaluation of optical see-through augmentation , 2001, Proceedings IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Augmented Reality.

[13]  Sean White,et al.  Vertical Vergence Calibration for Augmented Reality Displays , 2006, IEEE Virtual Reality Conference (VR 2006).

[14]  David Hinkley,et al.  Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife , 2008 .

[15]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Practical solutions for calibration of optical see-through devices , 2002, Proceedings. International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[16]  L. Chen,et al.  An investigation on the accuracy of three-dimensional space reconstruction using the direct linear transformation technique. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  Robert W Verona,et al.  Head Aiming/Tracking Accuracy in a Helicopter Environment. , 1978 .

[18]  J. Challis,et al.  Accuracy assessment and control point configuration when using the DLT for photogrammetry. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  Thomas Luhmann,et al.  Close Range Photogrammetry , 2007 .

[20]  Zhengyou Zhang,et al.  A Flexible New Technique for Camera Calibration , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[21]  J. Rolland,et al.  Head-worn displays: a review , 2006, Journal of Display Technology.

[22]  I. E. Sutherland,et al.  Three-dimensional data input by tablet , 1974, SIGGRAPH 1974.

[23]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Multiple View Geometry , 1999 .

[24]  Xinhua Zhuang,et al.  Pose estimation from corresponding point data , 1989, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[25]  Richard I. Hartley,et al.  In Defense of the Eight-Point Algorithm , 1997, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[26]  Roger Y. Tsai,et al.  A versatile camera calibration technique for high-accuracy 3D machine vision metrology using off-the-shelf TV cameras and lenses , 1987, IEEE J. Robotics Autom..

[27]  P. Milgram,et al.  A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays , 1994 .

[28]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  A Review and Investigation of Aiming and Tracking Performance with Head-Mounted Sights , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[29]  Wei Sun,et al.  An empirical evaluation of factors influencing camera calibration accuracy using three publicly available techniques , 2006, Machine Vision and Applications.

[30]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision (2nd ed) , 2003 .

[31]  Xiang Wan,et al.  Camera parameters estimation and evaluation in active vision system , 1996, Pattern Recognit..

[32]  Henry Fuchs,et al.  Optical Versus Video See-Through Head-Mounted Displays in Medical Visualization , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[33]  Stephen R. Ellis,et al.  Visual Alignment Precision in Optical See - Through AR Displays: Implications for Potential Accuracy , 2009, VRIC 2009.