Auditory Localization under Sustained +Gz Acceleration

The ability to localize a virtual sound source in the horizontal plane was evaluated under varying levels of sustained (+Gz) acceleration. Participants were required to judge the locations of spatialized noise bursts in the horizontal plane (elevation 0°) during exposure to 1.0, 1.5, 2.5, 4.0, 5.5, and 7.0 +Gz. The experiment was conducted at the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory's Dynamic Environment Simulator, a three-axis centrifuge. No significant increases in localization error were found between 1.0 and 5.5 +Gz; however, a significant increase did occur at the 7.0 +Gz level. In addition, the percentage of front/back confusions did not vary as a function of +Gz level. Collectively, these results indicate that the ability to localize virtual sound sources is well maintained at various levels of sustained acceleration. Actual or potential applications include the incorporation of spatial audio displays into the human-computer interface for vehicles that are operated in acceleration environments.

[1]  Richard L. McKinley,et al.  Spatial Audio Displays for Speech Communications: A Comparison of Free Field and Virtual Acoustic Environments , 1999 .

[2]  A. Mills.  On the minimum audible angle , 1958 .

[3]  John C. Middlebrooks,et al.  Monaural sound localization: Acute versus chronic unilateral impairment , 1994, Hearing Research.

[4]  D R Begault,et al.  Three-dimensional audio versus head-down traffic alert and collision avoidance system displays. , 1996, The International journal of aviation psychology.

[5]  P. Hancock,et al.  Adaptive control in human-machine systems , 1987 .

[6]  F L Wightman,et al.  Headphone simulation of free-field listening. II: Psychophysical validation. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  Adaptive Integration of Head-Coupled Multi-Sensory Displays for Target Localization , 2000 .

[8]  Richard L. McKinley,et al.  Monitoring the Simultaneous Presentation of Spatialized Speech Signals in a Virtual Acoustic Environment , 1998 .

[9]  Michael W. Haas,et al.  Adaptive interfaces for advanced airborne crew stations , 1996, Proceedings Third Annual Symposium on Human Interaction with Complex Systems. HICS'96.

[10]  M. Ericson,et al.  The Intelligibility of Multiple Talkers Separated Spatially in Noise , 2001 .

[11]  Gloria L. Calhoun,et al.  Localization Performance with Synthesized Directional Audio (U) , 1990 .

[12]  T. Anderson,et al.  Binaural and spatial hearing in real and virtual environments , 1997 .

[13]  Adelbert W. Bronkhorst,et al.  Application of a Three-Dimensional Auditory Display in a Flight Task , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[14]  T A Stinnett.  HUMAN FACTORS IN THE SUPER COCKPIT , 1989 .

[15]  Theodore J. Doll.  Synthesis of Auditory Localization Cues for Cockpit Applications* , 1986 .

[16]  Richard L. McKinley,et al.  Response measures used in free‐field localization , 1994 .

[17]  D R Begault,et al.  Head-Up Auditory Displays for Traffic Collision Avoidance System Advisories: A Preliminary Investigation , 1993, Human factors.

[18]  Robert S. Bolia,et al.  Aurally Aided Visual Search in Three-Dimensional Space , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[19]  Gloria L. Calhoun,et al.  Three-Dimensional Auditory Cue Simulation for Crew Station Design/Evaluation , 1987 .

[20]  R L McKinley,et al.  3-dimensional auditory displays: development, applications, and performance. , 1994, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[21]  Richard L. McKinley,et al.  Aurally Aided Visual Search under Virtual and Free-Field Listening Conditions , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[22]  P. Hancock.  Human Factors Psychology , 1987 .

[23]  G. L. Ricard,et al.  Intelligibility and Localization of Speech from Virtual Directions , 1994, Human factors.

[24]  Michael W. Haas,et al.  Effects of Localized Auditory Information on Visual Target Detection Performance Using a Helmet-Mounted Display , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[25]  R. Häusler,et al.  Sound localization in subjects with impaired hearing. Spatial-discrimination and interaural-discrimination tests. , 1983, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[26]  F L Wightman,et al.  Resolution of front-back ambiguity in spatial hearing by listener and source movement. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  Elizabeth M. Wenzel,et al.  Localization in Virtual Acoustic Displays , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[28]  Paul M. Hofman,et al.  Relearning sound localization with new ears , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  An Evaluation of Unisensory and Multisensory Adaptive Flight Path Navigation Displays: An Initial Investigation , 1999 .

[30]  Thomas A. Furness.  The Super Cockpit and its Human Factors Challenges , 1986 .

[31]  Robert B. King,et al.  The Impact of Signal Bandwidth on Auditory Localization: Implications for the Design of Three-Dimensional Audio Displays , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[32]  Robert E. Johnson,et al.  The Effects of Linear Acceleration on Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Human Ears , 1998, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[33]  Frederic L. Wightman,et al.  An Exploratory Study of the Use of Movement-Correlated Cues in an Auditory Head-Up Display , 1989 .

[34]  Scott E. Maxwell,et al.  Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data: A Model Comparison Perspective , 1990 .