Online reconstruction-free single-pixel image classification

Abstract In single-pixel imaging, a series of illumination patterns are projected onto an object and the reflected or transmitted light from the object is integrated by a photodetector (the single-pixel detector). Then, from the set of received photodetector signals, the image of the object can ultimately be reconstructed. However, this reconstruction is not only computationally expensive, but also unnecessary for purposes such as image classification tasks. This work proposes a reconstruction-free multi-class image classification framework that, unlike most of the existing approaches, exploits the sequential nature of the problem. Indeed, by accumulating evidence of the sequence of scalar values, a decision is made after each measurement on whether already classifying the object being imaged, or waiting for more measurements. This online decision relies on a mechanism to achieve a recognition-delay trade-off that induces behaviours within the conservative-to-aggressive spectrum, which suit distinct requirements in different applications. Additionally, the presentation order of the illumination patterns makes a difference in terms of the reconstruction quality (if required) and classification performance when a limited number of patterns is used. Nevertheless, in many cases, simple data- and task-agnostic orders, such as random or frequency-based orders, are commonly used. To address this, a novel sparse-representation-based strategy is presented that sorts the patterns according to their general and discriminability utilities. Both, the online classification framework including the recognition-delay trade-off mechanism, and the data- and task-aware pattern ordering proposed, are experimentally assessed, with encouraging results, on the MNIST digits and CalTech 101 Silhouettes datasets.

[1]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition , 1998, Proc. IEEE.

[2]  Michael Elad,et al.  Sparse and Redundant Representations - From Theory to Applications in Signal and Image Processing , 2010 .

[3]  Jun Guo,et al.  Bases sorting: Generalizing the concept of frequency for over-complete dictionaries , 2013, Neurocomputing.

[4]  Mark A Neifeld,et al.  Adaptive feature-specific imaging for recognition of non-Gaussian classes. , 2009, Applied optics.

[5]  Miles J. Padgett,et al.  Principles and prospects for single-pixel imaging , 2018, Nature Photonics.

[6]  Cong Shen,et al.  DARC: Timely Classification with Randomly Delayed Features , 2016, 2016 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).

[7]  Chinmay Hegde,et al.  Compressive image acquisition and classification via secant projections , 2015 .

[8]  M. Elad,et al.  $rm K$-SVD: An Algorithm for Designing Overcomplete Dictionaries for Sparse Representation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[9]  Ting Sun,et al.  Single-pixel imaging via compressive sampling , 2008, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[10]  A. Robert Calderbank,et al.  A general framework for reconstruction and classification from compressive measurements with side information , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[11]  Nando de Freitas,et al.  Inductive Principles for Restricted Boltzmann Machine Learning , 2010, AISTATS.

[12]  A. Robert Calderbank,et al.  Bounds on the Number of Measurements for Reliable Compressive Classification , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[13]  Aswin C. Sankaranarayanan,et al.  Enhanced Compressive Imaging Using Model-Based Acquisition: Smarter sampling by incorporating domain knowledge , 2016, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[14]  Robert P. W. Duin,et al.  The dissimilarity space: Bridging structural and statistical pattern recognition , 2012, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[15]  A. Wald Sequential Tests of Statistical Hypotheses , 1945 .

[16]  Joseph J. LaViola,et al.  Exploring the Trade-off Between Accuracy and Observational Latency in Action Recognition , 2013, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[17]  Pavan K. Turaga,et al.  Direct inference on compressive measurements using convolutional neural networks , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[18]  Richard G. Baraniuk,et al.  The smashed filter for compressive classification and target recognition , 2007, Electronic Imaging.

[19]  A. Robert Calderbank,et al.  Reconstruction of Signals Drawn From a Gaussian Mixture Via Noisy Compressive Measurements , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.