A continuous attractor neural network model of divided visual attention

The biologically realistic model of selective visual attention by Deco et al. uses a continuous attractor neural network to simulate a saliency map in posterior parietal cortex. We test the ability of the model to explain experimental evidence on the distribution of spatial attention. The majority of evidence supports the view that attention is a unitary construct, but recent experiments provide evidence for split attention foci. We simulate two such experiments. Our results suggest that the ability to divide attention depends on sustained endogenous signals from short term memory to the saliency map, stressing the interplay between working memory mechanisms and attention. Our results also point to a mechanism whereby inhibitory endogenous signals may play a role in dividing attention, suggesting a possible mechanism for inhibition of return.

[1]  Sabine Maasen,et al.  Mechanisms of visual attention : a cognitive neuroscience perspective , 1998 .

[2]  D. LaBerge,et al.  Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. , 1989 .

[3]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Space and attention in parietal cortex. , 1999, Annual review of neuroscience.

[5]  C. Koch,et al.  Computational modelling of visual attention , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[6]  Peter E. Latham,et al.  Divisive Normalization, Line Attractor Networks and Ideal Observers , 1998, NIPS.

[7]  S. A. Hillyard,et al.  Sustained division of the attentional spotlight , 2003, Nature.

[8]  S. Shipp The brain circuitry of attention , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  U. Neisser Cognitive Psychology: Classic Edition , 1967 .

[10]  S Ullman,et al.  Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. , 1985, Human neurobiology.

[11]  Noam Sobel,et al.  Attentional modulation in human primary olfactory cortex , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  Thomas P. Trappenberg,et al.  Multi-packet regions in stabilized continuous attractor networks , 2005, Neurocomputing.

[13]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[14]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Mnemonic coding of visual space in the monkey's dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Further Evidence for the Division of Attention Among Non-contiguous Locations , 1998 .

[16]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[17]  John K. Tsotsos On the relative complexity of active vs. passive visual search , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[18]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature binding, attention and object perception. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[19]  R. Klein,et al.  Splitting versus sharing focal attention: comment on Castiello and Umiltà (1992). , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  Roy Davis,et al.  Attention and performance in the workplace , 1999 .

[21]  G. Deco,et al.  The time course of selective visual attention: theory and experiments , 2002, Vision Research.

[22]  N. Cowan The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[23]  E. C. Cherry Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears , 1953 .

[24]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[25]  H. Pashler,et al.  Evidence for split attentional foci. , 2000, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[26]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.