Deliberative Speak at the Turbine Face: Community Engagement, Wind Farms, and Renewable Energy Transitions, in Australia

In late 2007, a new Australian federal government committed to significantly boosting Australia's energy consumption from renewable energy by 2020. With wind farms the most viable technology for such expansion, nothing, however, was suggested of how to address intense social conflict surrounding wind farm location; a situation provoked by inadequate community involvement in state government approval processes for wind farms. In seeking to redress that democratic deficit, in 2006, the prior federal government proposed a strong participatory National Code for Wind Farms. State governments rejected the proposal as a constraint to wind power and claimed adequate community engagement. In overviewing the debate, we find in favour of the prior federal government's position, refer to European participatory policy lessons, and find the National Code heavily featuring ‘deliberative speak’ in an approach suggesting placation of communities instead of its purported one of consensus-building. That informs some tentative suggestions of how to better engender a more socially viable and constructive approach for wind farm, and more broadly, renewable, energy transitions in Australia.

[1]  J. Eshuis,et al.  Trust and monitoring in governance processes: lessons from landscape management by farmers in a Dutch municipality , 2003 .

[2]  Gene Rowe,et al.  On evaluating the GM Nation? Public debate about the commercialisation of transgenic crops in Britain , 2006 .

[3]  N. Meyer Learning from wind energy policy in the EU: lessons from Denmark, Sweden and Spain , 2007 .

[4]  S. Parsons,et al.  A Framework for Deliberation Dialogues , 2001 .

[5]  A. Diduck,et al.  An Assessment of Stakeholder Advisory Committees in Forest Management: Case Studies from Manitoba, Canada , 2006 .

[6]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Planning of renewables schemes: Deliberative and fair decision-making on landscape issues instead of reproachful accusations of non-cooperation , 2007 .

[7]  L. Wagenet,et al.  Organizing Citizen Engagement for Democratic Environmental Planning , 2007 .

[8]  Joseph Szarka,et al.  Wind power, policy learning and paradigm change , 2006 .

[9]  D. Mercer,et al.  The Great Australian Wind Rush and the Devaluation of Landscape Amenity , 2003 .

[10]  A. Jobert,et al.  Local acceptance of wind energy: Factors of success identified in French and German case studies , 2007 .

[11]  N. Videira,et al.  Public and stakeholder participation in European water policy: a critical review of project evaluation processes , 2006 .

[12]  Linda M. Kamp,et al.  The importance of learning processes in wind power development , 2007 .

[13]  J. Pierre Debating Governance: Authority, Steering, and Democracy , 2000 .

[14]  Adrian Martin,et al.  Experts, decision making and deliberative democracy , 2005 .

[15]  G. Kelly Renewable Energy Strategies in England, Australia and New Zealand , 2007 .

[16]  G. Lawrence,et al.  Reflections on the Legitimacy of Regional Environmental Governance: Lessons from Australia's Experiment in Natural Resource Management , 2008 .

[17]  Richard Cowell,et al.  Managing wind power deployment in Europe , 2007 .

[18]  C. Gross,et al.  Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: The application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance , 2007 .

[19]  D. Bell,et al.  The ‘Social Gap’ in Wind Farm Siting Decisions: Explanations and Policy Responses , 2005 .

[20]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[21]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy , 2005 .

[22]  Peter Edwards,et al.  A Three-Stage Evaluation of a Deliberative Event on Climate Change and Transforming Energy , 2008 .

[23]  Tim Richardson,et al.  Exclusion: the necessary difference between ideal and practical consensus , 2004 .

[24]  Noel Cass,et al.  Participatory-Deliberative Engagement: a literature review , 2006 .

[25]  D. Chant,et al.  Review of arrangements for regional delivery of natural resource management programmes: final report , 2006 .

[26]  M. Diesendorf Wind power in Australia , 2006 .

[27]  Kate Burningham,et al.  The limitations of the NIMBY concept for understanding public engagement with renewable energy technologies: a literature review , 2006 .

[28]  David M. Konisky,et al.  Values, Conflict, and Trust in Participatory Environmental Planning , 2000 .

[29]  G. Lawrence Promoting sustainable development: The question of governance. Plenary address , 2005 .

[30]  Claire Haggett,et al.  Crossing the Great Divide ¿ Using Multi-method Analysis to Understand Opposition to Windfarms , 2006 .

[31]  Elizabeth Shove,et al.  Gaps, barriers and conceptual chasms : theories of technology transfer and energy in buildings , 1998 .

[32]  G Healey,et al.  Fostering technologies for sustainability: learning from the case of wind power in Australia , 2004 .

[33]  S. Jasanoff Science and citizenship: a new synergy , 2004 .

[34]  H. Lund Choice awareness: the development of technological and institutional choice in the public debate of Danish energy planning , 2000 .

[35]  F. Fischer Participatory Governance as Deliberative Empowerment , 2006 .

[36]  Mark Bolinger Making European-style community wind power development work in the US , 2005 .