Evaluation of the smoke-injection height from wild-land fires using remote-sensing data

Abstract. A new methodology for the estimation of smoke-injection height from wild-land fires is proposed and evaluated. It is demonstrated that the approaches developed for estimating the plume rise from stacks, such as the formulas of G. Briggs, can be formally written in terms characterising the wild-land fires: fire energy, size and temperature. However, these semi-empirical methods still perform quite poorly because the physical processes controlling the uplift of the wildfire plumes differ from those controlling the plume rise from stacks. The proposed new methodology considers wildfire plumes in a way similar to Convective Available Potential Energy (CAPE) computations. The new formulations are applied to a dataset collected within the MISR Plume Height Project for about 2000 fire plumes in North America and Siberia. The estimates of the new method are compared with remote-sensing observations of the plume top by the MISR instrument, with two versions of the Briggs' plume-rise formulas, with the 1-D plume-rise model BUOYANT, and with the prescribed plume-top position (the approach widely used in dispersion modelling). The new method has performed significantly better than all these approaches. For two-thirds of the cases, its predictions deviated from the MISR observations by less than 500 m, which is the uncertainty of the observations themselves. It is shown that the fraction of "good" predictions is much higher (>80%) for the plumes reaching the free troposphere.

[1]  David J. Diner,et al.  Aerosol source plume physical characteristics from space-based multiangle imaging , 2007 .

[2]  Gunnar Luderer,et al.  Modeling of biomass smoke injection into the lower stratosphere by a large forest fire (Part II): sensitivity studies , 2006 .

[3]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change , 1997 .

[4]  G. Briggs,et al.  Plume Rise Predictions , 1982 .

[5]  F. Bréon,et al.  Injection height of biomass burning aerosols as seen from a spaceborne lidar , 2007 .

[6]  Sundar A. Christopher,et al.  Mesoscale modeling of Central American smoke transport to the United States: 1. “Top‐down” assessment of emission strength and diurnal variation impacts , 2006 .

[7]  Ulla Wandinger,et al.  Transport of boreal forest fire emissions from Canada , 2001 .

[8]  Gunnar Luderer,et al.  Modeling of biomass smoke injection into the lower stratosphere by a large forest fire (Part I): reference simulation , 2006 .

[9]  Owen B. Toon,et al.  Simulations of microphysical, radiative, and dynamical processes in a continental-scale forest fire smoke plume , 1991 .

[10]  D. L. Nelson,et al.  Smoke injection heights from fires in North America: analysis of 5 years of satellite observations , 2009 .

[11]  Duane A. Haugen,et al.  Lectures on Air Pollution and Environmental Impact Analyses , 1982 .

[12]  J. Goldammer,et al.  Modeling of carbonaceous particles emitted by boreal and temperate wildfires at northern latitudes , 2000 .

[13]  T. Elperin,et al.  Energy- and flux-budget (EFB) turbulence closure model for stably stratified flows. Part I: steady-state, homogeneous regimes , 2006, physics/0610157.

[14]  J. Kauffman,et al.  Biomass dynamics associated with deforestation, fire, and, conversion to cattle pasture in a Mexican tropical dry forest , 2003 .

[15]  B. Ripley,et al.  Robust Statistics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Mathematical Geosciences.

[16]  M. Moncrieff,et al.  The dynamics and simulation of tropical cumulonimbus and squall lines , 1976 .

[17]  J. Dozier A method for satellite identification of surface temperature fields of subpixel resolution , 1981 .

[18]  Saulo R. Freitas,et al.  Technical Note: Sensitivity of 1-D smoke plume rise models to the inclusion of environmental wind drag , 2009 .

[19]  C. Justice,et al.  Potential global fire monitoring from EOS‐MODIS , 1998 .

[20]  Eric P. Shettle,et al.  Observations of boreal forest fire smoke in the stratosphere by POAM III, SAGE II, and lidar in 1998 , 2000 .

[21]  Yongqiang Liu,et al.  Important parameters for smoke plume rise simulation with Daysmoke , 2010 .

[22]  R. Colvile,et al.  Estimating the direct radiative forcing due to haze from the 1997 forest fires in Indonesia , 2004 .

[23]  Leonidas G. Lavdas,et al.  Program VSMOKE--Users Manual , 1996 .

[24]  David J. Diner,et al.  A data-mining approach to associating MISR smoke plume heights with MODIS fire measurements , 2007 .

[25]  A. M. Ryzhov,et al.  Numerical modeling of convective flows above large fires at various atmospheric conditions , 1991 .

[26]  J. Penner,et al.  A global three‐dimensional model study of carbonaceous aerosols , 1996 .

[27]  R. Barry,et al.  Atmosphere, Weather and Climate , 1968 .

[28]  M. Sofieva,et al.  A dispersion modelling system SILAM and its evaluation against ETEX data , 2005 .

[29]  David J. Diner,et al.  Wildfire smoke injection heights: Two perspectives from space , 2008 .

[30]  D. Edwards,et al.  CO source contribution analysis for California during ARCTAS-CARB , 2011 .

[31]  Peter J. Huber,et al.  Robust Statistics , 2005, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.

[32]  Jaakko Kukkonen,et al.  An operational system for the assimilation of the satellite information on wild-land fires for the needs of air quality modelling and forecasting , 2009 .

[33]  Jaakko Kukkonen,et al.  A hybrid plume model for local-scale atmospheric dispersion , 1999 .

[34]  David Brown,et al.  An Improved Methodology for Characterizing Atmospheric Boundary Layer Turbulence and Dispersion , 1997 .