Application of heuristic optimization techniques and algorithm tuning to multilayered sorptive barrier design.

Although heuristic optimization techniques are increasingly applied in environmental engineering applications, algorithm selection and configuration are often approached in an ad hoc fashion. In this study, the design of a multilayer sorptive barrier system served as a benchmark problem for evaluating several algorithm-tuning procedures, as applied to three global optimization techniques (genetic algorithms, simulated annealing, and particle swarm optimization). Each design problem was configured as a combinatorial optimization in which sorptive materials were selected for inclusion in a landfill liner to minimize the transport of three common organic contaminants. Relative to multilayer sorptive barrier design, study results indicate (i) the binary-coded genetic algorithm is highly efficient and requires minimal tuning, (ii) constraint violations must be carefully integrated to avoid poor algorithm convergence, and (iii) search algorithm performance is strongly influenced by the physical-chemical properties of the organic contaminants of concern. More generally, the results suggest that formal algorithm tuning, which has not been widely applied to environmental engineering optimization, can significantly improve algorithm performance and provide insight into the physical processes that control environmental systems.

[1]  Zbigniew Michalewicz,et al.  Adaptation in evolutionary computation: a survey , 1997, Proceedings of 1997 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation (ICEC '97).

[2]  James Kennedy,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 2002, Proceedings of ICNN'95 - International Conference on Neural Networks.

[3]  Alan J. Rabideau,et al.  Evaluation of Granular Activated Carbon, Shale, and Two Organoclays for Use as Sorptive Amendments in Clay Landfill Liners , 2005 .

[4]  R. Gullick,et al.  Effects of sorbent addition on the transport of inorganic and organic chemicals in soil-bentonite cutoff wall containment barriers. , 1998 .

[5]  T. Culver,et al.  Optimal design of a compacted soil liner containing sorptive amendments , 2006 .

[6]  George C. Runger,et al.  Using Experimental Design to Find Effective Parameter Settings for Heuristics , 2001, J. Heuristics.

[7]  Jay J. Bolus,et al.  Sorption and Desorption Rates of Carbon Tetrachloride and 1,2-Dichlorobenzene to Three Organobentonites and a Natural Peat Soil , 1998 .

[8]  Dimitri P. Solomatine,et al.  Groundwater Remediation Strategy Using Global Optimization Algorithms , 2002 .

[9]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[10]  Michael N. Vrahatis,et al.  Tuning PSO Parameters Through Sensitivity Analysis , 2002 .

[11]  Christine A. Shoemaker,et al.  Comparison of Optimization Methods for Ground-Water Bioremediation , 1999 .

[12]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[13]  W. Weber,et al.  Evaluation of shale and organoclays as sorbent additives for low-permeability soil containment barriers. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  John A. Cherry,et al.  Diffusive contaminant transport in natural clay: a field example and implications for clay-lined waste disposal sites , 1989 .

[15]  Reha Uzsoy,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of Heuristic Optimization Algorithms: A Tutorial , 2001, J. Heuristics.

[16]  T. Culver,et al.  Constraint Handling for Genetic Algorithms in Optimal Remediation Design , 2000 .

[17]  Ashutosh Khandelwal,et al.  Analysis of diffusion and sorption of organic solutes in soil-bentonite barrier materials , 1998 .

[18]  El-Ghazali Talbi,et al.  A Taxonomy of Hybrid Metaheuristics , 2002, J. Heuristics.

[19]  T. Edil,et al.  A review of aqueous-phase VOC transport in modern landfill liners. , 2003, Waste management.

[20]  D. P. Solomatine,et al.  Two Strategies of Adaptive Cluster Covering with Descent and Their Comparison to Other Algorithms , 1999, J. Glob. Optim..