On the geographic range of freshwater fish in river basins

We study the observed geographic distribution of freshwater fish species in the Mississippi-Missouri river system, focusing on the size and spatial distribution of geographic ranges. We use a particular metric of geographic distribution known as environmental resistance, a biogeographic index that quantifies the pointwise average spatial loss of community similarity to identify biogeographic regions of the river basin. Empirical patterns are compared with the results of a neutral metacommunity model in which local fish communities are interconnected through the ecological corridors provided by the river networks. Because neutral theory assumes that all individuals across all the species are functionally equivalent, the comparison is aimed to quantify how much of the geographic range patterns are the result of species' similarity rather than species differences, thus searching for an ecological null model for the analysis of biogeographic range. We also analyze how river network topology affects the spatial arrangement of species. Our results suggest that broad patterns of geographic range of freshwater fish in the Mississippi-Missouri can be explained simply by neutral dynamics engaged in river topology and competition for resources among species without invoking mechanisms that involve asymmetric interspecific interactions.

[1]  James H. Brown,et al.  Macroecology: The Division of Food and Space Among Species on Continents , 1989, Science.

[2]  R. Holt,et al.  Allee Effects, Invasion Pinning, and Species’ Borders , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[3]  Dawn M. Kaufman,et al.  THE GEOGRAPHIC RANGE: Size, Shape, Boundaries, and Internal Structure , 1996 .

[4]  D. Schemske,et al.  Evolution of Trichome Number in a Naturalized Population of Brassica rapa , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[5]  A. Ruggiero.  Size and shape of the geographical ranges of Andean passerine birds: spatial patterns in environmental resistance and anisotropy , 2001 .

[6]  James H. Brown,et al.  Evolution of Species Assemblages: Effects of Energetic Constraints and Species Dynamics on the Diversification of the North American Avifauna , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[7]  S. Levin.  The problem of pattern and scale in ecology , 1992 .

[8]  J. Rosenfield.  Pattern and process in the geographical ranges of freshwater fishes , 2002 .

[9]  S. Pacala,et al.  Ecological drift in niche-structured communities: neutral pattern does not imply neutral process , 2005 .

[10]  J. Newbold,et al.  Contributions of microbial biofilms to ecosystem processes in stream mesocosms , 2003, Nature.

[11]  J. Damuth,et al.  Population density and body size in mammals , 1981, Nature.

[12]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Measuring beta diversity for presence–absence data , 2003 .

[13]  Enrico Bertuzzo,et al.  River networks as ecological corridors: A complex systems perspective for integrating hydrologic, geomorphologic, and ecologic dynamics , 2009 .

[14]  S. Levin,et al.  A neutral metapopulation model of biodiversity in river networks. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  K. Rohde,et al.  Rapoport's Rule Does Not Apply to Marine Teleosts and Cannot Explain Latitudinal Gradients in Species Richness , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[16]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Conservation Implications of Georaphic Range Size—Body Size Relationships , 1996 .

[17]  Gregory E. Schwarz,et al.  Effect of stream channel size on the delivery of nitrogen to the Gulf of Mexico , 2000, Nature.

[18]  T. Blackburn,et al.  Rapoport's rule: time for an epitaph? , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[19]  E. Wiley,et al.  The Zoogeography of North American Freshwater Fishes , 1987 .

[20]  I. Kitching,et al.  Measuring range sizes of South-East Asian hawkmoths (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) : effects of scale, resolution and phylogeny , 2006 .

[21]  G. C. Stevens.  The Latitudinal Gradient in Geographical Range: How so Many Species Coexist in the Tropics , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[22]  A. Maritan,et al.  Scaling in ecosystems and the linkage of macroecological laws. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[23]  R. May,et al.  Observations on related ecological exponents. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  R. Muneepeerakul,et al.  Patterns of vegetation biodiversity: the roles of dispersal directionality and river network structure. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[25]  K. Gaston,et al.  Species-range-size distributions: patterns, mechanisms and implications. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[26]  J. Lawton,et al.  The geographic ranges of mammalian species in South America: spatial patterns in environmental resistance and anisotropy , 1998 .

[27]  K. Rohde.  Latitudinal gradients in species diversity and Rapoport's rule revisited: a review of recent work and what can parasites teach us about the causes of the gradients? , 1999 .

[28]  R. Muneepeerakul,et al.  Neutral metacommunity models predict fish diversity patterns in Mississippi–Missouri basin , 2008, Nature.

[29]  Aaron I. Packman,et al.  Biophysical controls on organic carbon fluxes in fluvial networks , 2008 .

[30]  E. Pianka.  Latitudinal gradients in species diversity , 1989 .

[31]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  The Contribution of Population and Community Biology to Conservation Science , 1988 .

[32]  A. Rinaldo,et al.  Fractal River Basins: Chance and Self-Organization , 1997 .

[33]  D. W. Shimwell,et al.  Areography: Geographical Strategies of Species , 1983 .

[34]  G. C. Stevens.  Extending Rapoport's rule to Pacific marine fishes , 1996 .

[35]  W. Fagan.  CONNECTIVITY, FRAGMENTATION, AND EXTINCTION RISK IN DENDRITIC METAPOPULATIONS , 2002 .

[36]  S. Hubbell,et al.  The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography at age ten. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.