Managing e-learning group processes using teleological enquiring principles

This paper is concerned with managing e-learning communities. It reports on the process and methods adopted in an EU project called MEDFORIST. The challenges of managing this project were considerable because there was significant social diversity amongst the e-leaning community members. The paper outlines some key principles derived from teleology (or, the ‘study of purpose’) that were used to structure some key aspects of the management of the e-learning group processes. These principles were developed and used, in order to structure enquiring activities to inform the design, monitoring and evaluation activities in the provision of e-learning group processes. The paper outlines the use of such enquiry as a foundation for the continued development of the application of e-learning in contexts in which divergent human groups come together in unstructured, non-prescriptive human learning activities. As such, the paper outlines some key methodological requirements for managing e-learning group processes.

[1]  Donald Hislop,et al.  Mission impossible? Communicating and sharing knowledge via information technology , 2002, J. Inf. Technol..

[2]  C. Churchman,et al.  The design of inquiring systems: basic concepts of systems and organization , 1971 .

[3]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[4]  Hugh Willmott,et al.  Re-Embedding Situatedness: The Importance of Power Relations in Learning Theory , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[5]  Ivana Adamson,et al.  Are the Knowledge Management Professionals Up to the Job? , 2002, PAKM.

[6]  A. Elzinga The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1997 .

[7]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[8]  M. McLure Wasko,et al.  "It is what one does": why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[9]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[10]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The knowledge-creating company , 2008 .

[11]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The core competence of the corporation’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. pp. . , 1990 .

[12]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  Soft Systems Methodology in Action , 1991 .

[13]  K. Boulding General Systems Theory---The Skeleton of Science , 1956 .

[14]  Keith Mattacks,et al.  Managing Knowledge Work , 2003 .

[15]  Harry Scarbrough,et al.  Towards a second generation of KM? The people management challenge , 2001 .

[16]  Karen Neville,et al.  A case in customizing e-learning , 2005, J. Inf. Technol..

[17]  D. Hindman The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier , 1996 .

[18]  J. R. Beaumont Diagnosing the System for Organizations , 1985 .

[19]  F. Blackler Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation , 1995 .

[20]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[21]  J. P. Kawalek,et al.  Systems thinking and knowledge management: positional assertions and preliminary observations , 2004 .

[22]  R. H. Franke The Unbounded Mind: Breaking the Chains of Traditional Business Thinking , 1993 .

[23]  J. Brown,et al.  Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective , 2001 .

[24]  Oleg Liber,et al.  A framework for the pedagogical evaluation of eLearning environments , 2004 .

[25]  C. West Churchman,et al.  The Systems Approach , 1979 .

[26]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[27]  W. Dilthey,et al.  The essence of philosophy , 1956 .

[28]  Stafford Beer,et al.  Brain of the Firm: The Managerial Cybernetics of Organization , 1972 .

[29]  Gilbert Probst,et al.  Managing Knowledge: Building Blocks for Success , 1999 .

[30]  Reginald W. Revans Developing effective managers : a new approach to business education , 1971 .

[31]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[32]  E. Wenger Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[33]  Stephen Fox Communities Of Practice, Foucault And Actor‐Network Therory , 2000 .

[34]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Review: Understanding and Evaluating Methodologies , 1995 .

[35]  Ian I. Mitroff,et al.  Stakeholders of the Organizational Mind: Toward a New View of Organizational Policy Making. , 1985 .

[36]  Y. I. Kim [General systems theory]. , 1989, Taehan kanho. The Korean nurse.

[37]  P. Kollock The Economies of Online Cooperation: Gifts and Public Goods in Cyberspace , 1999 .

[38]  G. Walsham Knowledge Management:: The Benefits and Limitations of Computer Systems , 2001 .

[39]  Alexander Ardichvili,et al.  Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice , 2003, J. Knowl. Manag..

[40]  I. Nonaka,et al.  SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation , 2000 .

[41]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Diagnosing the system for organizations: S. BEER Wiley, Chichester, 1985, 152 + xiii pages, £7.50 , 1986 .

[42]  Robert M. Grant,et al.  Knowledge and Organization , 2001 .

[43]  A. Lin Knowledge Assets: Securing Competitive Advantage in the Information Economy , 2001 .

[44]  D. Buchanan,et al.  Organizational Behaviour: an Introductory Text , 1972 .

[45]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .

[46]  B. Rubenstein-Montano,et al.  A systems thinking framework for knowledge management , 2001, Decis. Support Syst..

[47]  Ken Starkey,et al.  Bridging the Relevance Gap: Aligning Stakeholders in the Future of Management Research , 2001 .

[48]  C. Churchman,et al.  Experience and Reflection , 1959 .