Human handedness: is there a difference in the independence of the digits on the preferred and non-preferred hands?

In non-human primates, comparative studies show that greater dexterity is associated with greater independent control over the digits. Studies of humans, however, show no difference in the degree of independent control of single digits on the more dexterous preferred hand and its less dexterous partner. We wondered whether there might be a difference in the degree of independent control on the two hands during performance of functionally relevant tasks. Many object manipulation tasks require the ability to produce and control forces with more than one finger at the same time. We hypothesized that asymmetrical independence, with greater independence on the preferred than the non-preferred hand, would be evident with a task that requires the simultaneous production of force in two digits. We examined digit individuation when subjects produced flexion forces with a single digit in isolation, and simultaneous flexion forces in all ten combinations of two digits. Consistent with previous studies, we found no difference between the individuation of the digits on the preferred and non-preferred hands during force production with single digits in isolation. Similarly, no asymmetry was present when forces were produced by two digits. However, separation of two-digit forces into thumb-to-digit opposition forces and non-opposition forces showed that although there was no difference in individuation between the two hands for non-opposition forces, the digits on the preferred hand were more independent than those on the non-preferred hand for opposition forces. We suggest that this independence asymmetry is not itself the underlying cause of the dexterity differences between the hands, but rather arises from a difference in the capacity for use-dependent reorganization of the motor cortical circuits controlling each hand, and that this difference might underlie the dexterity differences between the hands.

[1]  D. G. Lawrence,et al.  The functional organization of the motor system in the monkey. I. The effects of bilateral pyramidal lesions. , 1968, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  D. G. Lawrence,et al.  The functional organization of the motor system in the monkey. II. The effects of lesions of the descending brain-stem pathways. , 1968, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  Variation in form of the pyramidal tract and its relationship to digital dexterity. , 1975, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[4]  K. Flowers,et al.  Handedness and controlled movement. , 1975, British journal of psychology.

[5]  E. Lechelt,et al.  Laterality in the perception of successive tactile pulses , 1976 .

[6]  Peter L. Strick,et al.  Multiple representation in the primate motor cortex , 1978, Brain Research.

[7]  B Durding,et al.  Left-handers and right-handers compared on a motor task. , 1979, Journal of motor behavior.

[8]  J. Annett,et al.  The Control of Movement in the Preferred and Non-Preferred Hands* , 1979, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  Andrew Kertesz,et al.  Cerebral Asymmetries on Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1986, Cortex.

[10]  D. Elliott,et al.  Manual asymmetries in visually directed aiming. , 1986, Canadian journal of psychology.

[11]  A. Ardila,et al.  Handedness and psychophysics: weight and roughness. , 1987, The International journal of neuroscience.

[12]  Geoffrey R. Hammond,et al.  Hand asymmetries in interresponse intervals during rapid repetitive finger tapping. , 1988, Journal of motor behavior.

[13]  D. Elliott,et al.  Manual Asymmetries in Aimed Movements , 1989 .

[14]  S. Gandevia,et al.  The distribution of muscular weakness in upper motor neuron lesions affecting the arm. , 1989, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  M. Schieber Individuated finger movements of rhesus monkeys: a means of quantifying the independence of the digits. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  E. G. Jones,et al.  Relationship of intrinsic connections to forelimb movement representations in monkey motor cortex: a correlative anatomic and physiological study. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  V. Hömberg,et al.  Development of speed of repetitive movements in children is determined by structural changes in corticospinal efferents , 1992, Neuroscience Letters.

[18]  A Keller,et al.  Intrinsic synaptic organization of the motor cortex. , 1993, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  R. Porter,et al.  Corticospinal Function and Voluntary Movement , 1993 .

[20]  M. Schieber,et al.  How somatotopic is the motor cortex hand area? , 1993, Science.

[21]  D. Elliott,et al.  Kinematic Analyses of Manual Asymmetries in Visual Aiming Movements , 1994, Brain and Cognition.

[22]  J. Donoghue,et al.  Long-term potentiation of horizontal connections provides a mechanism to reorganize cortical motor maps. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  J. Donoghue,et al.  Shared neural substrates controlling hand movements in human motor cortex. , 1995, Science.

[24]  J. Flanagan,et al.  Hand and brain : the neurophysiology and psychology of hand movements , 1996 .

[25]  A. Schleicher,et al.  Asymmetry in the Human Motor Cortex and Handedness , 1996, NeuroImage.

[26]  Stephen Perrig,et al.  Two Hands—One Action , 1996 .

[27]  J. Donoghue,et al.  Long‐term Depression of Horizontal Connections in Rat Motor Cortex , 1996, The European journal of neuroscience.

[28]  K M Heilman,et al.  Hand preference and magnetic resonance imaging asymmetries of the central sulcus. , 1998, Neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, and behavioral neurology.

[29]  A Schnitzler,et al.  Handedness and asymmetry of hand representation in human motor cortex. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  J. Donoghue,et al.  Strengthening of horizontal cortical connections following skill learning , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  Karl M. Newell,et al.  Motor redundancy during maximal voluntary contraction in four-finger tasks , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The organization of the cortical motor system: new concepts. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[33]  S. Pellis,et al.  Is digital dexterity really related to corticospinal projections?: a re-analysis of the Heffner and Masterton data set using modern comparative statistics , 1999, Behavioural Brain Research.

[34]  J. Donoghue,et al.  Plasticity and primary motor cortex. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[35]  M H Schieber,et al.  Quantifying the Independence of Human Finger Movements: Comparisons of Digits, Hands, and Movement Frequencies , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  M. Latash,et al.  Enslaving effects in multi-finger force production , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  K. Reilly,et al.  Independence of force production by digits of the human hand , 2000, Neuroscience Letters.

[38]  W. Helsen,et al.  Vision and Laterality: Does Occlusion Disclose a Feedback Processing Advantage for the Right Hand System? , 2000, Cortex.

[39]  Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky,et al.  Characteristics of finger force production during one- and two-hand tasks , 2000 .

[40]  Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky,et al.  Finger Coordination and Bilateral Deficit During Two-Hand Force Production Tasks Performed by Right-Handed Subjects , 2000 .

[41]  H. Sakata,et al.  Selectivity for the shape, size, and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area AIP. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[42]  Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky,et al.  Bilateral deficit and symmetry in finger force production during two-hand multifinger tasks , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[43]  G. Hammond,et al.  Correlates of human handedness in primary motor cortex: a review and hypothesis , 2002, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[44]  M. Schieber,et al.  Differential impairment of individuated finger movements in humans after damage to the motor cortex or the corticospinal tract. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  J. Donoghue,et al.  Organization of the forelimb area in squirrel monkey motor cortex: representation of digit, wrist, and elbow muscles , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.