Towards a benchmark for land surface models

[1] This paper addresses the question of how well we should expect a land surface model to perform. A statistically-based artificial neural network is used as a de facto land surface model and its results used to benchmark the performance of a traditional physically-based land surface model. This provides us with a measure of land surface model performance relative to the information contained in the meteorological forcing about the surface fluxes. Further, it is a benchmark that is independent of the measure of model performance. The technique is used to benchmark three models at three observational sites, with results showing that for the most part, the models under-utilise the information available to them. This suggests that there are considerable opportunities for model improvement.

[1]  Ray Leuning,et al.  A two-leaf model for canopy conductance, photosynthesis and partitioning of available energy. II. Comparison with measurements , 1998 .

[2]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Effective and efficient algorithm for multiobjective optimization of hydrologic models , 2003 .

[3]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Self-organization and associative memory: 3rd edition , 1989 .

[4]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Self-Organization and Associative Memory , 1988 .

[5]  Kuolin Hsu,et al.  Self‐organizing linear output map (SOLO): An artificial neural network suitable for hydrologic modeling and analysis , 2002 .

[6]  Mariana Vertenstein,et al.  The Community Land Model's Dynamic Global Vegetation Model (CLM-DGVM): Technical description and user's guide , 2004 .

[7]  Kuolin Hsu,et al.  Neural Error Regression Diagnosis (NERD): A Tool for Model Bias Identification and Prognostic Data Assimilation , 2006 .

[8]  R. Leuning,et al.  A two-leaf model for canopy conductance, photosynthesis and partitioning of available energy I:: Model description and comparison with a multi-layered model , 1998 .

[9]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Technical Description of the Community Land Model (CLM) , 2004 .

[10]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  A dynamic global vegetation model for studies of the coupled atmosphere‐biosphere system , 2005 .

[11]  A. J. Pitman,et al.  What are the limits to statistical error correction in land surface schemes when projecting the future? , 2005 .

[12]  Eric Deleersnijder,et al.  Are there internal Kelvin waves in Lake Tanganyika? , 2004 .