Inclusive STEM High School Design: 10 Critical Components

Historically, the mission of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) schools emphasized providing gifted and talented students with advanced STEM coursework. However, a newer type of STEM school is emerging in the United States: inclusive STEM high schools (ISHSs). ISHSs have open enrollment and are focused on preparing underrepresented youth for the successful pursuit of advanced STEM studies. They promise to provide a critical mass of nontraditional STEM students, defying stereotypes about who does STEM and creating positive STEM identities. In this article, we advance a conceptual framework designed to systematically capture the qualities of ISHSs that can provide exciting new possibilities for students and communities. An iterative review of the literature suggests 10 critical components that may work together across 3 dimensions: design, implementation, and outcomes. Our goal is to apply this framework in various school models to better understand the opportunity structures that emerge and to create a theory of action of ISHSs.

[1]  Gayani Deepika Madhdhumage.  බළන්ගොඩ ප්රදේශය ආශ්රිත ශාන්තිකර්ම පිළිබඳ තුලනාත්මක අධ්යයනයක් (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) , 2016 .

[2]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  Second international handbook of science education , 2012 .

[3]  Sharon J. Lynch.  Metaphor and Theory for Scale-up Research: Eagles in the Anacostia and Activity Systems , 2012 .

[4]  Robert H. Tai,et al.  Specialized Public High Schools of Science, Mathematics, and Technology and the STEM Pipeline: What Do We Know Now and What Will We Know in 5 Years? , 2009 .

[5]  J. Comer.  What I Learned In School: Reflections on Race, Child Development, and School Reform , 2009 .

[6]  C. Scott.  A Comparative Case Study of the Characteristics of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Focused High Schools , 2009 .

[7]  R. Phillips,et al.  Social capital and community building , 2008 .

[8]  Frederick M. Hess.  The Future of Educational Entrepreneurship: Possibilities for School Reform , 2008 .

[9]  Carol L. O'Donnell.  Defining, Conceptualizing, and Measuring Fidelity of Implementation and Its Relationship to Outcomes in K–12 Curriculum Intervention Research , 2008 .

[10]  A. Bryk.  Ruminations on Reinventing an R & D Capacity for Educational Improvement , 2008 .

[11]  Sharon J. Lynch,et al.  Scaling Up Highly Rated Middle Science Curriculum Units for Diverse Student Populations : Features That Affect Collaborative Research and Vice Versa 1 , 2007 .

[12]  Venessa Keesler,et al.  Scaling-Up Exemplary Interventions , 2006 .

[13]  N. Augustine.  Rising Above The Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future , 2006 .

[14]  Robert E. Stake,et al.  Multiple Case Study Analysis , 2005 .

[15]  A. George,et al.  Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences , 2005 .

[16]  Deborah Bybee,et al.  Fidelity Criteria: Development, Measurement, and Validation , 2003 .

[17]  C. Coburn,et al.  Rethinking Scale: Moving Beyond Numbers to Deep and Lasting Change , 2003 .

[18]  W. Dolfsma,et al.  Subjects and Boundaries: Contesting Social Capital-Based Policies , 2003 .

[19]  Mathea Falco,et al.  A review of research on fidelity of implementation: implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. , 2003, Health education research.

[20]  Laura M. Desimone,et al.  How Can Comprehensive School Reform Models Be Successfully Implemented? , 2002 .

[21]  Michael A. Hitt,et al.  The Importance of Social Capital to the Management of Multinational Enterprises: Relational Networks Among Asian and Western Firms , 2002 .

[22]  N. Uphoff,et al.  Demonstrated Benefits from Social Capital: The Productivity of Farmer Organizations in Gal Oya, Sri Lanka , 2000 .

[23]  D. Brewer,et al.  Does Teacher Certification Matter? High School Teacher Certification Status and Student Achievement , 2000 .

[24]  Andrew V. Dane,et al.  Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: are implementation effects out of control? , 1998, Clinical psychology review.

[25]  Brian Rowan,et al.  Using research on employees' performance to study the effects of teachers on students' achievement? , 1997 .

[26]  R. Elmore.  Getting to Scale with Good Educational Practice , 1996 .

[27]  David H. Monk,et al.  Subject area preparation of secondary mathematics and science teachers and student achievement , 1994 .

[28]  David C. Treadway.  Before It's Too Late , 1989 .

[29]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[30]  K. Stanfield.  The national commission on excellence in education , 1984 .

[31]  Peter J. Denning,et al.  A nation at risk: the imperative for educational reform , 1983, CACM.

[32]  David B. Tyack.  The One Best System: A History of American Urban Education , 1974 .

[33]  Ken Roberts,et al.  The Entry into Employment: An Approach towards a General Theory , 1968 .