The science planning process on the Rosetta mission

Abstract The Rosetta mission arrived at comet 67 P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko in Summer 2014, after more than 10 years in space. All previous mission encounters with a comet have provided a snapshot of the cometary activity at a given heliocentric distance. In contrast, Rosetta has escorted the comet nucleus for an extended period (>2 years) at a large range of cometo-centric and heliocentric distances, which has provided exceptional and unprecedented observing conditions to study, analyse and monitor 67 P during its passage to, through and away from perihelion. One of the biggest challenges of this mission is the development of an observation plan that adequately addresses the mission's science objectives while coping with a largely unknown and continuously evolving environment that constantly modifies the planning constraints. The Rosetta Science Ground Segment (RSGS), in support of the Project Scientist and the Science Working Team, is in charge of translating the high level mission science objectives into a low level pointing and operations plan. We present here the high-level science planning process adopted during the comet escort phase. We describe the main science objectives addressed along the mission lifetime, the different groups involved in the science planning, and the approach followed to translate those requirements into a viable and scientifically valid operations plan. Finally, we describe how the science planning scheme has evolved since arrival at the comet to react to the unexpected environment, largely reducing the planning lead times.

[1]  Munetaka Ueno,et al.  AKARI NEAR-INFRARED SPECTROSCOPIC SURVEY FOR CO2 IN 18 COMETS , 2012 .

[2]  João Alves,et al.  Rosetta mission results pre-perihelion , 2015 .

[3]  Claire Vallat,et al.  Rosetta science operations in support of the Philae mission , 2016 .

[4]  J. Berthelier,et al.  Comparison of 3D kinetic and hydrodynamic models to ROSINA-COPS measurements of the neutral coma of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko , 2015 .

[5]  Hermann Boehnhardt,et al.  Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko at a large heliocentric distance , 2008 .

[6]  Jean-Michel Reess,et al.  First observations of H2O and CO2 vapor in comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko made by VIRTIS onboard Rosetta , 2015 .

[7]  M. Fulchignoni,et al.  Rosetta begins its Comet Tale , 2015, Science.

[8]  Miguel Almeida,et al.  The Rosetta science operations and planning implementation , 2018 .

[9]  Bernhard Geiger Data processing and visualisation in the Rosetta Science Ground Segment , 2016 .

[10]  Claire Vallat,et al.  Activity-Based Scheduling of Science Campaigns for the Rosetta Orbiter , 2015, IJCAI.

[11]  Zhong-Yi Lin,et al.  67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko activity evolution during its last perihelion before the Rosetta encounter , 2011 .

[12]  D. Plettemeier,et al.  The Comet Nucleus Sounding Experiment by Radiowave Transmission (CONSERT): A Short Description of the Instrument and of the Commissioning Stages , 2007 .

[13]  Paul D. Feldman,et al.  Comet Bowell (1980b) , 1982 .

[14]  Rita Schulz,et al.  Rosetta target comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko: Postperihelion gas and dust production rates , 2004 .

[15]  Ignacio Ferr'in Three predictions: Comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko, comet C/2012 K1 PANSTARRS, and comet C/2013 V5 Oukaimeden , 2014 .

[16]  T. Encrenaz,et al.  Subsurface properties and early activity of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko , 2015, Science.

[17]  R. Schulz,et al.  Evolution of the dust coma in comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko before the 2009 perihelion , 2011, 1105.0329.

[18]  J. Ortiz,et al.  67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko at large heliocentric distance , 2011 .

[19]  Eric Quémerais,et al.  The water production rate of Rosetta target Comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko near perihelion in 1996, 2002 and 2009 from Lyman α observations with SWAN/SOHO , 2014 .